Delhi Court February 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State vs.b.raj Sharma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 74/2016 Judgment reserved on :10. h January, 2017 Date of decision :20. h February, 2017 ........ Petitioner STATE Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, Additional Public Prosecutor for State. versus B.RAJ SHARMA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Jitender Sethi, Mr. Naveen Kumar and Mr.A.Rohen Singh, Advocates for R-1 and R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. Notice of this petition Crl.L.P. No.74/2016 seeking leave to appeal and seeking condonation of delay in institution of the appeal was issued to the respondents in terms of order dated 9th February, 2016, pursuant to which the respondents have put in appearance. The delay of 21 days in institution of the Criminal Leave to Appeal petition was condoned vide order dated 22nd March, 2016 whereby Criminal Leave Petition was allowed. The trial court record having been requisitioned, has been received, perused and considered....
Sudershan vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. No.763/2001 Date of Decision :20. h FEBRUARY, 2017 SUDERSHAN STATE ..... APPELLANT Through Mr.Mir Akhtar Hussain, Adv. with appellant in person. versus Through Mr.Ashish Dutta, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. ..... RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 18th July, 1. 2001 convicting the appellant finding him guilty under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as NDPS Act, 1985) and order on sentence dated 18th July, 2001 vide which the sentence was passed against the appellant to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 21 of the NDPS Act, in default of payment of fine, convict was ordered to undergo simple imprisonment for three years, the present appeal has been filed.2. The facts in brief are that a secret inf...
M/S Sky Tech Construction Pvt Ltd vs.shyam Sunder Taparia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
$~A-41 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. 02.2017 CM(M) 203/2017 and CM Nos. 6562-6565/2017 M/S SKY TECH CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr. B.P. Singh and Mr.K.V. Sreemithun, Advocates. versus SHYAM SUNDER TAPARIA Through ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) By the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of 1. India, the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 22.10.2016 by which an application filed by the petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC was dismissed.2. The respondent has filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 9,01,599/-. The respondent had booked a flat in a multi storey building being built by the petitioner at Ghaziabad vide Builder Buyer Agreement dated 15.11.2009 for a total sale consideration of Rs.22,75,000/-. The respondent also took a back to back loan from HDFC Bank for Rs.19 lakhs. It is the case of the respondent that the petitioner had promised that in Septem...
Triveni Engineering & Industries Limited vs.nahar Industrial Enterpris ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: January 2, 2017 Date of Decision: February 20, 2017 + TRIVENI ENGINEERING & INDUSTRIES LIMITED ........ Petitioner O.M.P. 610/2008 Through: Mr. Sanjeev Anand & Mr. Akshay Kapoor, Advocates. versus NAHAR INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod B. Agarwala & Mr. Aayush Agarwala, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % JUDGMENT2002.2017 1. The challenge in this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) by Triveni Engineering & Industries Limited (Triveni) having its office in Deoband, District Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh is to an Award dated 28th August, 2008 passed by the sole Arbitrator in the disputes between Triveni and the Respondent, Nahar Industrial Enterprises Limited (Nahar) (earlier known as Nahar Sugar & Allied Industries Limited), arising out of an Agreement dated 5th August, 1993 whereunder Triveni was to design, procure, manufacture, supply, transport to th...
Jaspreet Singh @ Golu vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP (CRL) 135/2017 Date of Hearing & Order: February 20th, 2017 JASPREET SINGH @ GOLU Through versus Through STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioner Mr. Mohit Tomar, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Sanjay Lao, ASC for State with Mr.Siddharth Sindhu. ASI Narender, PS Tilak Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.(Oral) 1. The present writ petition under Article 226 Of the Constitution of India r/w S. 482 Cr.P.C has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Sh. Jaspreet Singh@Golu for quashing of FIR No.604/2016, under Section 323/354/506/5IPC registered at Police Station Tilak Nagar, Delhi on the basis of a mediation executed between the petitioner and respondents No.2 & 3 namely, Paramjit Singh and Amarjeet Kaur respectively.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2 present in the Court has been Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for WP (CRL) 135/2017 Page 1 of 7 identified to be the complainant in the FIR in question.3. The fact...
Ramesh Chander vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :15. h NOVEMBER, 2016 DECIDED ON :20. h FEBRUARY, 2017 RAMESH CHANDER CRL.A. 841/2014 ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Ramesh Gupta, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Bharat Sharma, Mr.Avinish Rana & Mr.Ajay P.Tushir, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + S.P.GARG, J.The present appeal stands disposed of in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.662/2014 titled Parveen Kumar vs. State. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE FEBRUARY20 2017 / tr...
Lekhraj vs.chhvi Nandan Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
$~24 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA5822016, CM Nos.29144/2016(stay) and 29146/2016(delay) LEKHRAJ Through Mr. Aman Preet Singh Rahi, Adv. with the appellant in person ..... Appellant versus CHHVI NANDAN SINGH ..... Respondent Through Mr. Vijay Kinger and Mr. S.C. Kashyap, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The present appeal was filed by the appellant on 3.8.2016, against the ORDER2002.2017 impugned judgement and decree dated 30th May, 2015.2. The appellant has filed CM No.29146/2016 praying inter alia for condonation of delay of 28 days in filing the accompanying appeal. Till date, a certified copy of the impugned judgment dated 30th May, 2015 has not been filed.3. Pertinently, at the time of filing the appeal, the appellant had filed an application for seeking exemption from filing certified copies of the documents/annexures to the appeal (CM No.29145/2016). Vide order dated 10th August, 2016, the said application was allowed subject to all just excepti...
s.n. Singh vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3116/2015 Date of Decision :20. h February, 2017 S.N. SINGH Through Mr. M. K. Bhardwaj , Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Naresh Kaushik and Mr. Swega Agarwal, Advocates for UPSC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The petitioner-S. N. Singh is a retired Principal Director from the Armed Forces Headquarter Civil Service (AFHQ Civil Service), to which post he was promoted in the year 2010-2011.2. The petitioner had filed OA No.3712/2011 challenging validity the letter dated 02.09.2011 rejecting his claim for promotion to the post of Director in the year 2006-2007 instead of 2007-2008 and to the post of Principal Director in the year 2009-2010, with other consequential benefits.3. The O.A. was dismissed vide the first impugned order dated 09.10.2012. The second impugned order dated 24.12.2014, dismissed WP(C) ...
M/S Technovations vs.micro and Small Industries Facilitations Council ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
$~76 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 1476/2017 Judgment delivered on:20. 02.2017 M/S TECHNOVATIONS ........ Petitioner MICRO AND SMALL INDUSTRIES FACILITATIONS COUNCIL & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS :Ms. Tanya Dayal, Advocate : Mr. Sanjoy Ghjose and Mr. Rhishabh Jetley, Advocates CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT1 The petitioner by the present petition seeks a direction to the respondent No.1 i.e. Micro and Small Industries Facilitations Council, New Delhi to expeditiously process the reference of the petitioner dated 09.09.2014 under Section 18 (4) of the Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006.2. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 on advance notice submits that in terms of Section 18(4) of the Act, the Micro and Small Industries Facilitations Council or the Centre providing W.P.(C) No.1476/2017 Page 1 of 3 a...
Sanjay Behari & Ors. Vs.i.f.c.i. Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.1552/2017 + % SANJAY BEHARI & ORS. Through:20. h February, 2017 Mr. D.R. Nigam, Advocate. ........ Petitioners versus Through: None. I.F.C.I. LIMITED CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1.... Petitioners by this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seek the relief of being granted pay revision with effect from 1.11.2007 and with further and consequential reliefs of payment of arrears, revised pension, etc.... Petitioners are those employees who took voluntary retirement from the respondent/IFCI Limited/employer under the VRS Scheme of 2008. Voluntary retirement was granted to the petitioners with effect from 25.2.2008 and the petitioners have received their complete monetary packages under the relevant VRS Scheme. W.P.(C) No.1552/2017 Page 1 of 13 2.... Petitioners claim that the existing employees of the respondent/e...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »