Delhi Court February 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ranbir Singh and Ors. Vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + W.P.(C) 5395/2015 & CM No.9724/2015 Judgment Reserved on:04. 01.2017 Judgment delivered on:21. 02.2017 JAI KISHAN & ANR GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS . + W.P.(C) 5399/2015 & CM97332015 ........ Petitioners versus RANVIR SINGH & ORS GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 5406/2015 & CM97422015 ........ Petitioners versus SAMUNDER SINGH & ORS GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 5430/2015 & CM97832015 ........ Petitioners versus ANAND KUMAR & ANR GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 5431/2015 & CM97842015 ........ Petitioners versus HARI SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners W.P.(C) 5395/2015 & Ors. Page 1 of 14 versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 5432/2015 & CM97852015 JAI PRAKASH AND ORS. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 5433/2015 & CM97862015 ........ Petitioners versus KRISHAN ...
Om Prakash & Ors vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + W.P.(C) 5395/2015 & CM No.9724/2015 Judgment Reserved on:04. 01.2017 Judgment delivered on:21. 02.2017 JAI KISHAN & ANR GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS . + W.P.(C) 5399/2015 & CM97332015 ........ Petitioners versus RANVIR SINGH & ORS GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 5406/2015 & CM97422015 ........ Petitioners versus SAMUNDER SINGH & ORS GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 5430/2015 & CM97832015 ........ Petitioners versus ANAND KUMAR & ANR GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 5431/2015 & CM97842015 ........ Petitioners versus HARI SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners W.P.(C) 5395/2015 & Ors. Page 1 of 14 versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 5432/2015 & CM97852015 JAI PRAKASH AND ORS. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 5433/2015 & CM97862015 ........ Petitioners versus KRISHAN ...
Chandan Singh vs.the Manager, l.n. Girdhari Ku Senior Secondary School ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.5709/2010 21st February, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S. Sunil, Advocate. CHANDAN SINGH THE MANAGER, L.N. GIRDHARI KU SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate for R- 2 with Ms. Pushpinder Kaur, DEO Zone -8 in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks the relief of being promoted to the post of Lab Assistant with the respondent no.1/school.... Petitioner seeks promotion from the post of Peon to the post of Lab Assistant.2. In the present case the concerned post of Lab Assistant to which petitioner claims promotion was created on 13.7.2004. Therefore, it is argued, and rightly so on behalf of the petitioner, that only the persons who are eligible as on 13.7.2004 should be considered for the post. W.P.(C)...
Steel Authority of India & Ltd vs.cement Corportion of India & Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2017
$~37. * + W.P.(C) 6228/2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI1 STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA & LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate with Mr. Ashwani Bhalla, AGM (Legal). versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jainendra Maldahiyar, Advocate CEMENT CORPORTION OF INDIA & LTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia ORDER2102.2017 for quashing the award dated 17.04.2013 made by the Joint Secretary and Arbitrator, Permanent Machinery of Arbitration, Department of Public Enterprise, New Delhi whereunder a part of the claims filed by the petitioner against the respondent, have been allowed.2. On 31.1.2017, Dr. Bhardwaj, learned counsel for the petitioner had drawn the attention of the court to a recent decision of the Supreme Court in the case of M/s Northern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Heavy Engineering Corp. Ltd. & Anr. reported as 2016 (6) SCALE820 wherein it has been held that if an award passed und...
Azad Bharat Congress vs.election Commission of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 775/2017 AZAD BHARAT CONGRESS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vatsalya Vigya and Ms. Swetab, Advocates. versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA Through: Mr. P.R. Chopra, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER0202.2017 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, a political party registered under the Representation of People Act, 1951, praying inter alia that the respondent/ECI be directed to allot it a common symbol for contesting the general election to the Legislative Assembly in the State of Uttar Pradesh.2. On the last date of hearing, none was present on behalf of respondent/ECI.3. Today, Mr. Chopra, learned counsel appears for the respondent/ECI and states that vide letter dated 16.1.2017, the President of the petitioner was duly informed that the request for allotment of a common symbol cannot be acceded to as the symbol proposed by the petitioner is either allotted or a resembl...
Calcutta Haldia Port Road Company Ltd vs.m/s Cwhec-Hcil(jv)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:20. 02.2017 + O.M.P. (COMM) 559/2016 CALCUTTA HALDIA PORT ROAD COMPANY LTD Versus ........ Petitioner M/S CWHEC-HCIL(JV) ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Ramesh Kumar and Ms Udita Malviya. : Mr Arvind Minocha. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J Calcutta Haldia Port Road Company Ltd. (hereafter 'the Employer'), 1. a company constituted under Section 3 of the National Highways Authority of India Act, 1988, has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter 'the Act') impugning an arbitral award dated 27.04.2007 (hereafter 'the impugned award') rendered by the Arbitral Tribunal. By way of the impugned award, the Arbitral Tribunal, inter alia, 2. accepted the claim of the respondent (hereafter 'the Contractor') that it is entitled to be paid for the work relating to subgrade and ha...
Parveen Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :15. h NOVEMBER, 2016 DECIDED ON :20. h FEBRUARY, 2017 PARVEEN KUMAR CRL.A. 662/2014 ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Ramesh Gupta, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Bharat Sharma, Mr.Avinish Rana & Mr.Ajay P.Tushir, Advocates. STATE VERSUS Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. ..... Respondent RAMESH CHANDER CRL.A. 841/2014 ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Ramesh Gupta, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Bharat Sharma, Mr.Avinish Rana & Mr.Ajay P.Tushir, Advocates. VERSUS STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. AJAY KUMAR ..... Appellant CRL.A. 847/2014 Through : Mr.N.Hariharan, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Vaibhav Sharma, Mr.Avnish Rana, Mr.Siddharth S.Yadav & Mr.Aditya Vaibhav Singh, Advocates. + + AND + Crl.A.662/2014 & connected matters. Page 1 of 12 VERSUS STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The instant appeals have been preferred by the appellants Par...
Azad Singh Alias Toonda vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : February 20, 2017 Crl. A. No.303/2001 AZAD SINGH ALIAS TOONDA ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.JUDGMENT1 Present appeal has been filed by the appellant being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and order on sentence dated 09.04.2001 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi convicting the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 307 of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as I.P.C.) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment five years with fine of Rs.3,000/- and in default of payment to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. for a period of 2. The facts emerging from the record of the prosecution are that on 20.10.1995 at about 8.12 PM an information was received at Police Station Sultanpuri from PC...
cpl.b.k.verma vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
* % + W.P.(C) 5952/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on: February 20, 2017 CPL.B.K.Verma ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ......... RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Monika Arora, AGSC with Mr. Kushal Kumar and Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA ORDER INDIRA BANERJEE, J1 The petitioner, a non-commissioned officer in the Indian Air Force of the rank of Corporal, has filed this writ petition, interalia challenging an order dated 05/07/2016, whereby the application of the petitioner for study leave to enable him to undergo the M TECH course at IIT Dhanbad has been rejected.2. The petitioner has been denied leave on the purported ground that there is no provision for grant of study leave to airmen in ===================================================================== W.P.(C) No.5952/2016 Page 1 of 12 the Defence Services Regulations (India) Leave Rules,...
Sunil Kumar Singh & Ors vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: November 11, 2016 Judgment delivered on: February 20, 2017 + W.P.(C) 4810/2015, CM No.8700/2015 SUNIL KUMAR SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Rekha Palli, Sr. Adv. with Mrs. Punam Singh, Ms. Ankita Patnaik, Ms. Garima Sachdeva and Ms. Shruti Munjal, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Bharathi Raju, CGSC for R1 and R2. CORAM: HONBLE MS JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 This writ petition has been filed by Ninety Five (95) Assistant Commandants working in the Border Security Force under the respondent No.2 with the following prayers:-"A. Issue a writ of certiorari quashing the letter dated 27.6.2013 vide which the Commando Course has been made mandatory for promotion of Assistant W.P. (C) 4810/2015 Page 1 of 32 Commandants appointed through Limited Departmental Competitive Examination to the rank of Deputy Commandant; B. Pass an...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »