Delhi Court February 2017 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Feb 21 2017

Narayan Singh & Anr. Vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-21-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + W.P.(C) 5395/2015 & CM No.9724/2015 Judgment Reserved on:04. 01.2017 Judgment delivered on:21. 02.2017 JAI KISHAN & ANR GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS . + W.P.(C) 5399/2015 & CM97332015 ........ Petitioners versus RANVIR SINGH & ORS GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 5406/2015 & CM97422015 ........ Petitioners versus SAMUNDER SINGH & ORS GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 5430/2015 & CM97832015 ........ Petitioners versus ANAND KUMAR & ANR GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 5431/2015 & CM97842015 ........ Petitioners versus HARI SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners W.P.(C) 5395/2015 & Ors. Page 1 of 14 versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 5432/2015 & CM97852015 JAI PRAKASH AND ORS. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 5433/2015 & CM97862015 ........ Petitioners versus KRISHAN ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2017

M/S Atma Ram Properties Pvt Ltd vs.new Delhi Municipal Council & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-21-2017

$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1607/2017 & CM72372017 1. M/S ATMA RAM PROPERTIES PVT LTD Through : Mr. Amit Sethi, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR Through : Mr. Arjun Mitra, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present ORDER2102.2017 petition, while reserving the right of his client to invoke the provisions of Section 115 of the New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994 (in short the Act) by filing an appeal against the property tax assessment orders in respect of the subject premises, for the assessment years 2012-13 and 2013- 2014.2. Counsel for the respondent/NDMC states that the respondent/NDMC reserves its right to raise the plea of maintainability of the said appeal, as may be available under Sections 116 and 117 of the Act.3. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The writ petition is disposed of, along with the pending application. FEBRU...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2017

Anil Kumar Sharma & Ors vs.bimal Julka & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-21-2017

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6599/2016 Date of Decision :21. h February, 2017 ANIL KUMAR SHARMA & ORS. Through Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus BIMAL JULKA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC for R-1 Mr. S. M. Arif, Advocate with Mr. M. R. Junaidi and Ms. Shabnam Perween, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order dated 19.04.2016 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal for short) in C.P. No.443/2015 in OA No.4191/2013, titled Anil Kumar Sharma & Ors. Vs. Bimal Julka & Anr.. The order under challenge holds that there was substantial compliance and the petitioners', if aggrieved, could challenge the orders passed in accordance with law.2. The Tribunal disposing of OA No.4191/2013 vide dated WP...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2017

Samunder Singh & Ors vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-21-2017

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2017

Richa Industries Limited vs.delhi Metro Rail Corporation and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-21-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:28. 07.2016 Judgment delivered on:21. 02.2017 * % + W.P(C) 5996/2016 RICHA INDUSTRIES LIMITED DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION AND ANR. versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR : Mr Krishnendu Datta with Ms Sanjana Saddy. : Mr Dinesh Malik, Adv. for R-2. JUDGMENT ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J1 The petitioner, a limited company, engaged in the business of textiles and manufacturing of prefabricated steel structures for erection of warehouses, factories, workshops, railway station sheds, etc. participated in a bid issued by respondent no.1, for supply, fabrication and erection of pre-engineered roof structures of 8 elevated stations. In the aforesaid bid, the respondent no.2 had also submitted a bid and was declared to be the L-1 bidder (lowest bidder) whereas the petitioner was ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2017

Sukhbir Singh & Ors vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-21-2017

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2017

Dayanand & Ors vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-21-2017

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2017

Prem Singh & Ors vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-21-2017

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2017

Surender Budhiraja & Ors vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-21-2017

$~36 * + W.P.(C) 1319/2017 & CM60212017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SURENDER BUDHIRAJA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through : Mr. Parvesh Khanna, Mr. Ashok Sharma and Ms. Deepshikha Bharti, Advocates GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate for Govt. of NCT of Delhi. Ms. Latika Chaudhary, proxy counsel for Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER2102.2017 1. Counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the present petition, while reserving the of his clients to seek their remedies for challenging the validity of the elections, results whereof were declared on 12.12.2016 for electing one member to the Delhi Agricultural Marketing Board and two members of the Azadpur Marketing Committees, under Rule 64 of the Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1998.2. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the present petition, the same is disposed of with liberty g...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2017

Dart Industries Inc. & Anr vs.techno Plast & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-21-2017

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) 589/2005 & IA No.11267/2006 (u/S12of Contempt of Court Act) DART INDUSTRIES INC. & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Hemant Singh, Ms. Mamta R. Jha and Ms. Shruttima Ehersa, Advs. TECHNO PLAST & ORS. Versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Sushant Singh and Mr. Ankit Kaushal, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER2102.2017 14023/2016 (u/O VI R-17 CPC of the plaintiffs for amendment of the plaint) 1. The plaintiffs have sued for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from (i) committing acts of piracy; (ii) manufacturing, selling or offering for sale infringing products listed in the Table II of the plaint having shape and configuration identical to or resembling the plaintiffs registered deigns applied to the Tupperware Products and being infringing copies of the Tupperware Products thereby infringing the plaintiffs copyright in the registered designs listed in Table I of the plaint as well as infringing the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court February 2017 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.