Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 9 of about 598 results (0.021 seconds)Rambir vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:20. h December, 2017 + W.P. (C.) No.5441/2017 RAMBIR Through Mr. Lalit Kumar Rawal and Mr. Sunil ........ Petitioner K. Goel, Advocates versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. Sanjeev Sagar and Ms. Meetu Singh, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Counter affidavit has been handed over in Court by the LAC. The same is taken on record.2. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra no.241/2(02-10) 56 (06-00) having 1/8th share, situated in the revenue estate...
Tag this Judgment!United India Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.shivani Sharma Lakhender Jyoti Sharm ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 20, 2017 (i) + MAC.APP. 632/2015 & CM APPL. 14190/2015 (ii) + MAC.APP. 634/2015 & CM APPL. 14194/2015 (iii) + MAC.APP. 636/2015 & CM APPL. 14203/2015 (iv) + MAC.APP. 637/2015 & CM APPL. 14207/2015 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate ..... Appellants Versus SHIVANI SHARMA LAKHENDER JYOTI SHARMA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Parveen Kumar Mehndiratta, Mr. S.C. Pandey & Mr. Ram Singh, Advocates for respondents-Claimants (v) + MAC.APP. 735/2015 (vi) + MAC.APP. 736/2015 (vii) + MAC.APP. 738/2015 (viii) + MAC.APP. 739/2015 SHIVANI SHARMA LAKHENDER JYOTI SHARMA & ORS. LAKHENDER JYOTI SHARMA SHIVANI SHARMA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Parveen Kumar Mehndiratta, Mr. S.C. Pandey & Mr. Ram Singh, Advocates Versus MAC.APP. 632/2015 & connected matters Page 1 of 9 1. RAJINDER SINGH & ORS (M/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.) .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate for ...
Tag this Judgment!Naresh Kumar vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on :6. h September, 2016 Date of decision :20. h December, 2016 CRL.A. No.540/2000 NARESH KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.D. Singh and Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh, Advs. versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, APP for the State CRL.A. No.764/2000 MAHENDER KUMAR Through: Mr. Krishan Kumar, ..... Appellant versus Ms. Vidushi Sharma and Ms. Sunita Arora , Advs. STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA JUDGMENT Crl.A. 540 & 764/2000 Page 1 of 51 GITA MITTAL, J.1. A trivial incident, one summer evening involving a few drops of water spilling over on to the chhajja (parapet) of a neighbours house has resulted in fatal injuries to one person; injuries to several other persons of that family and these protracted proceedings which commenced on 14th of June, 1995 with the registration of FIR No.4registered by...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Jindal Promoters (P) Ltd vs.m/s Jaipuria Buildtech (P) Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 3085/2015 & I.A.Nos.9908/2016, 13735/2016 M/S JINDAL PROMOTERS (P) LTD Through Mr. T.K. Tiwari, Advocate ..... Plaintiff versus M/S JAIPURIA BUILDTECH (P) LTD Through None ..... Defendant Date of Decision:20. h December, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for recovery of Rs.5,00,00,000/- along with interest @ 24% per annum.2. It is the case of the plaintiff that the plaintiff-company is a builder company and is engaged in the business of building residential flats in Noida-U.P. and Delhi. It is further stated that the defendant is engaged in the sale/purchase of property/plots and deals in real estate.3. Learned counsel for the plaintiff states that the defendant had approached the plaintiff for the sale of land comprising half portion of Khasra No.947 area measuring 2660 Sq.Mtrs. (3180 Sq. Yds.), Khasra No.948 area measuring 3670 Sq. Mtrs. (4389 Sq. Yds.), half por...
Tag this Judgment!Brijesh Kumar Verma vs.aurangjeb & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. h December, 2017 FAO3452016 and CM Appln.26849/2016 BRIJESH KUMAR VERMA ...... Appellant Through: Mr. Harvinder Singh, Mr.Jatin Kumar, Advocates versus AURANGJEB & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Pratima N. Chauhan, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, ASC GNCTD. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The appellant has challenged the order dated 6th May, 2016 passed by the Commissioner, Employees Compensation whereby compensation of Rs.10,69,008/- along with interest @ 12% per annum has been awarded to respondent no.1.2. The appellant is the owner of property bearing No.BU-48, Pitampura, Delhi on which a four storey building was being constructed in March 2012. On 6th March, 2012, the roof (lintel) of the third floor was being laid. Respondent no.1 and his father were FAO3452016 Page 1 of 72 working as labourers on the construction site, along with 12-13 other labourers. According to res...
Tag this Judgment!Shyamo vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-42 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:20. h December, 2017 + W.P.(C) 12174/2015 SHYAMO Through: Mr. Lalit K. Rawal, Advs. versus ........ Petitioner GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for L&B/LAC Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Adv. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a declaration that land in Khasra No.47 (15-5), 48 (01-00) & 49 (12-19) total area 29 bighas and 04 biswas (1/12th share measuring 02 bighas and 09 biswas) situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Ghonda Gujaran Khadar, Shahdara, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) stands lapsed in view of the provisions of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation And Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation And Resettl...
Tag this Judgment!Hari Ram & Anr vs.registrar General, Delhi High Court
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:06. 07.2017 Pronounced on:20. 12.2017 + W.P.(C) 9357/2016 HARI RAM & ANR ........ Petitioners Through : Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Padma Kumar S., Sh. Amandeep Joshi and Sh. Himanshu Gautam, Advocates. versus REGISTRAR GENERAL, DELHI HIGH COURT..... Respondent Through : Sh. Sanjoy Ghose, Sh. Rhishabh Jetley, Ms. Pratishtha Vij and Sh. Urvi Mohan, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.Complaining of unjustified denial of third financial upgradation 1. under the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (hereafter called MACPS, for convenience), the writ petitioners approach this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution for appropriate directions.2. Both the petitioners joined the establishment of the High Court initially in the cadre of Upper Division Clerk [UDC]. (the first petitioner on 05.09.1998 and the second petitioner on 22.10.1984) from which...
Tag this Judgment!Ashok Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.state and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST.CAS. 79/2016 ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Anuj Kumar Pandey, Advocate for P-1 & P-2. versus STATE AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Anuj Kumar Pandey Advocate for R3, R4 R5 and R6. Date of Decision :20. h December, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present petition has been filed under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act for grant of probate of Will dated 06th August, 2010 of deceased Smt. Sita Rani, w/o Late Sh. Raja Ram.2. In the petition it has been averred that the petitioners are the sons of late Smt. Sita Rani, who expired on 19th March, 2016 in New Delhi. The deceased is stated to have executed a registered Will dated 06th August, 2010, which was duly attested by Mr. Jai Prakash and Mr. Sushil Kumar Sharma. The Wxcxill dated 06th August, 2010 executed by the deceased is reproduced hereinbelow:-"Know all men by these presents that the world is mor...
Tag this Judgment!In the Matter of Ajis India Private Lmited (In Vol. Liqn) Vs.......... ...
Court: Delhi
$~CP-33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:20. 12.2017 CO.PET. 67/2017 IN THE MATTER OF AJIS INDIA PRIVATE LMITED (IN VOL. LIQN) Through Mr. Deepak Anand, Advocate on ........ Petitioner behalf of Official Liquidator. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (herein referred to as the act) by the Official Liquidator (OL), seeking for voluntary winding up of Ajis India Private Limited (herein referred to as the said company).2. The said Company was incorporated on 24.03.2011 under the provisions of the Act with the Registrar of Companies (ROC), having authorized share capital of Rs. 5,00,00,000/- divided into 50,00,000 equity shares of Rs. 10/- each.3. The registered office of the said company is situated within the territory of NCT of Delhi & Haryana at Times Square, Fourth Floor, Block- B, Sushant Lok-1, Gurgaon, Haryana-122022.4. Pursuant to the provision of Sec...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India vs.hindustan Oil Exploration Company Limited
Court: Delhi
$~23 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 457/2017 Date of decision:20. h December, 2017 UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Vivek Kohli, Ms.Prerna Kohli, Ms.Neha Rajpal and Ms.Pankhuri, Advs. versus HINDUSTAN OIL EXPLORATION COMPANY LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Tejas Karia, Ms,Ila Kapoor, Ms.Ananya Aggarwal and Ms.Ritika Sinha, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) CAV.1101/2017 As learned counsel for the respondent has appeared on advance notice, the caveat stands discharged. IA No.15327/2017 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions OMP(COMM) 457/2017 Page 1 O.M.P. (COMM) 457/2017 1. This is a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenging the Arbitral Award dated 21.08.2017 to the limited extent whereby it is held that the demand by Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gases (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner) for liquidated d...
Tag this Judgment!