Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Reebok India Company & Ors vs.registrar of Company
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2017
$~CP-16 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % Date of decision 21.12.2017 + CO.A(SB) 58/2014 M/S REEBOK INDIA COMPANY & ORS...... Appellant Through Mr.Abhinav Vashisht, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Niraj Singh, Mr.Alok Kr.Srivastav and Ms.Priya Singh, Advs. versus REGISTRAR OF COMPANY ..... Respondent Through Mr.Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking to impugn the order dated 15.09.2014 passed by the Company Law Board dismissing the application of the appellant under section 621A of the Companies Act, 1956. The case of the appellant is that in the Financial Year 2011-12 the management of the company faced complications and difficulties arising out of financial irregularities which surfaced in January 2012 committed by the erstwhile senior Executive, namely, Subhinder Singh Prem, Managing Director and Vishnu Bhagat, Chief Operating Officer whose services were t...
Amit Kumar vs.south Delhi M. C. D. Green Park and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2017
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11532/2017 % Date of Decision:21. t December, 2017 AMIT KUMAR Through: Mr. Vivek Srivastava, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus SOUTH DELHI M. C. D. GREEN PARK AND ORS Through: Mr. Parveen ..... Respondent Kumar for Aggarwal, Advocate SDMC. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition has been filed for the reason that the respondent No.1South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC) has not responded to the complaint dated 18th August, 2017 of the petitioner regarding unauthorized constructions being carried out at the property bearing House No.29 & 29D/A-1, Building No.1, Royal Green Complex, Desu Raod, Mehrauli, New Dellhi 110030.2. We are informed by Mr. Parveen Kumar Aggarwal, ld. counsel for the respondent No.1-SDMC that action has already been taken against the said properties. W.P.(C) No.11532/2017 Page 1 of 2 3. In view of the abo...
Bestime Trading Co. Private Limited vs.alchmist Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. t December, 2017 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 459/2017 BESTIME TRADING CO. PRIVATE LIMITED........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv K. Garg with Sandeep Banga and Mr. Ashish Garg, Advocates versus ALCHMIST LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Abhishek Singh with Mr. Sohail Walia, Advocates + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 544/2017 & I.A. 15324/2017 ALCHEMIST LTD (PHARMA DIVISION) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Singh with Mr. Sohail Walia, Advocates versus BESTIME TRADING CO. PVT. LTD. & ORS...... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajiv K. Garg with Sandeep Banga and Mr. Ashish Garg, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. The above petitions arise out of disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the National C&F Agreement dated 9th July, 2015/ 11th June, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as the OMP(COMM) Nos.459/2017 & 544/2017 Page 1 Agreement). In terms of the said Agreement, the petitioner (Be...
d.t.c. Vs.aas Mohammad & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2017
$~1 and 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 6244/2003 and CM APPL No.11994/2005 Date of decision: December 21, 2017 AAS MOHAMMED ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Dilshad A. Khan, Advocate D.T.C. versus Through Ms. Bhakti Pasrija Sethi and Mr. ..... Respondent Moksh Pasrija, Advocates + W.P.(C) 498/2004 and CM APP No.400/2004 D.T.C. Through Ms. Bhakti Pasrija Sethi and Mr. ........ Petitioner Moksh Pasrija, Advocates versus AAS MOHAMMAD & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Dilshad A. Khan, Advocate for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR R-1 These writ petitions arise from an order dated 29th January 2003, 1 JUDGMENT (ORAL) passed by the learned Industrial Tribunal-II, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the learned Tribunal), in an application filed by the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC), under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for approval of its action to remove the WP (C) 6244/2003 & WP (C) 498/2004 Page 1 of 8 work...
Airports Authority of India vs.sikka Associates
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI OMP (COMM) NO.164/2017 Reserved on:29. h November, 2017 Date of decision:21. t December, 2017 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. K.K. Rai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijay Rai, Ms. Chetna Rai, Mr. Anshul Rai and Mr. Pulkit Tyagi, Advocates. versus Through: Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Senior ...... Respondent SIKKA ASSOCIATES Advocate with Mr. Angad Mehta and Mr. Samaksh Goyal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the arbitral award dated 23rd March, 2015 passed by the Sole Arbitrator.2. The petitioner had invited global design competition for comprehensive architectural and engineering services for the proposed new Domestic Terminal Building at NSCBI Airport at OMP (COMM) No.164/2017 Page 1 Kolkata (West Bengal). The competitive design submitted ...
Krishan Gopal Tiwari and Anr vs.appellate Authority and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2017
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10265/2017 KRISHAN GOPAL TIWARI AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Bharat Singh, Mr Pramod Kumar, versus Advocates. APPELLATE AUTHORITY AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms Suparna Srivastava, Ms Alinda Bhawal, Ms Sanjva Dua, Advocates for Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2112.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 18.10.2017 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the Appellate Authority under Section 17 of the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994 (hereafter the Act). By the said impugned order, the petitioners appeal against the order dated 29.08.2017 passed by the Authorisation Committee rejecting the petitioners request for approval of Kidney Transplantation, was rejected.2.... Petitioner No.1 was diagnosed as suffering from end renal disease due to diabetic nephropathy. According to the doctors, peti...
Yogendra Singh vs.indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: May 02, 2017 Judgment delivered on: December 20,2017 + W.P.(C) 5237/2000 YOGENDRA SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ashok Agarwal & Ms.Slomita Rai, versus Advs. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. Through: Mr.V.N.Koura, Mr.P.Banipal, Mr.Abhinav Tandon, Advs. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-"that the declare In the premises aforesaid the... Petitioner most humbly prays that this Honble Court may be pleased to: (a) impugned orders dated 08.12.1998, 26.06.1998 and 08.09.1992 (Annexures- A, B and C respectively) of the Respondent are illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and bad in law and direct the Respondent the consequential benefits; (b) pass any such further order or direction as this Honble Court may in the facts and circumstances of the present case deem fit and proper in favour of the... Petition...
Union of India and Anr. Vs.dr. B N Mittal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2017
$~11. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11390/2017 and CM APPL. 46492-94/2017 1. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocate for Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC versus DR. B N MITTAL ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Tamali Wad with Mr. Prince Anthony, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % ORDER2012.2017 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner against a dead man, Dr. B.N. Mittal, without impleading his legal heirs, who were duly impleaded before the Tribunal in O.A. No.2339/2004, upon his demise on 28.07.2014.2. On the first call, Ms. Tamali Wad, Advocate had entered appearance on behalf of the legal heirs of late Dr.B.N. Mittal to point out the above position and had submitted that she has appeared in the case on seeing the same listed in the cause list, though she is not on caveat. She further stated that aggrieved by the impugned order dated 02.07.2017 passed by the Tribunal, her c...
Ram Singh vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2017
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:20. h December, 2017 + W.P. (C.) No.5442/2017 RAM SINGH Through Mr. Lalit Kumar Rawal and Mr. Sunil ........ Petitioner versus K. Goel, Advocates GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. Sanjeev Sagar and Ms. Meetu Singh, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Counter affidavit has been handed over in Court by the LAC. The same is taken on record.2. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. The present petition has been filed under Artic le 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra no.241/2(02-10) 56 (06-00) having 1/8th share, situated in the revenue es...
Balwanti Devi and Ors. Vs.land Acquisition Collector & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2017
$~R-30 * % + W.P.(C) 6565/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:20. h December, 2017 BALWANTI DEVI AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Inder Singh, Adv. versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain and Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advts. for LAC/L&B. Ms. Mrinalini Sen Gupta, adv. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings in respect of the land comprised in Khasra Nos.1979/742 min. total area measuring 3 bigha (half share) situated in the revenue estate of village Tuglakabad, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as 2013 Act) as neithe...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »