Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 5 of about 598 results (0.019 seconds)Surender Kaur & Anr vs.anoop Singh Charitable Trust
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI K.S. BHANDARI Date of decision:22. d December, 2017 RC.REV. 18/2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gaurav Bhardwaj & Mr. J.Mitra, Advs. Versus INTERNATIONAL SECURITY PRINTERS PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajiv Dewan & Mr. Aditya Mishra, Advs. AND + RC.REV. 204/2017 & CM No.15804/2017 (for stay) FRONTIER SALES ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Versus Mr. Praveey Pahuja, Adv. SUPERIOR EXIM PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anup J.Bhambani, Senior Advocate with Ms.Gurmeet Bindra, Adv. AND + RC.REV. 205/2017 & CM No.15807/2017 (for stay) FRONTIER SALES ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Versus Mr. Praveey Pahuja, Adv. SUPERIOR EXIM PVT LTD ..... Respondent RC.Rev.Nos.18/2016, 204-08/2017, 303/2017, 318/2017, 396-97/2017 & 519-20/2017 Page 1 of 34 Through: Mr. Anup J.Bhambani, Senior Advocate with Ms.Gurmeet Bindra...
Tag this Judgment!Saurabh and Anr. Vs.satyawanti College and Other
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 22, 2017 W.P.(C) 11604/2017 SAURABH AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Puneet Kumar Rai, Advocate and Mr.Neeraj Kumar Shah, Advocate versus SATYAWANTI COLLEGE AND OTHER ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Slomita Rai, Advocate for Mr.Mohinder J.S.Rupal, Advocate for DU Mr.Apoorv Kurup, Advocate and Ms.Isha Mital, Advocate for UGC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER ORAL CM No.47246/2017 Allowed subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) No.11604/2017 & CM No.47245/2017 1. In this petition, petitioners seek mandamus to first respondent to issue confirmation letters to petitioners who had applied for the post of Junior Assistant (Lower Division Clerk) in pursuance to an online advertisement. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that first petitioner was selected under unreserved category whereas the second petitioner was selected under reserved category and they have successfully completed the period of probation...
Tag this Judgment!Sgt Ravi Kumar vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SGT RAVI KUMAR $~7. * + W.P.(C) 11567/2017 and CM APPL. 47141-47142/2017 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. versus ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Virender Singh Kadian, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Ms. Tejaswita, Advocate and Wg.Cdr. A.K. Chauhan.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % The petitioner, who is a Seargent in the Indian Air Force and ORDER2212.2017 presently posted at ASTE, Bangalore, has filed the present petition praying inter alia for issuing directions to the respondents/Indian Air Force, for issuance of a No Objection Certificate in his favour, to enable him to appear in the interview to be conducted by the respondent No.5/Institute of Banking Personnel Selection (in short IBPS) on 02.01.2018, for appointment to the post of officer Scale-I in Regional Rural Banks.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the respondent No.5/IBPS had issued a Notification...
Tag this Judgment!Shivani Sharma & Anr. Vs.rajinder Singh & Ors (M/S United India Insura ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 22, 2017 (i) + MAC.APP. 632/2015 & CM APPL. 14190/2015 (ii) + MAC.APP. 634/2015 & CM APPL. 14194/2015 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate ..... Appellants Versus SHIVANI SHARMA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Parveen Kumar Mehndiratta, Mr. S.C. Pandey & Mr. Ram Singh, Advocates for respondents-Claimants (iii) + MAC.APP. 735/2015 (iv) + MAC.APP. 739/2015 SHIVANI SHARMA SHIVANI SHARMA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Parveen Kumar Mehndiratta, Mr. S.C. Pandey & Mr. Ram Singh, Advocates Versus RAJINDER SINGH & ORS (M/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE .....Respondents COMPANY LTD.) Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate for respondent-Insurer CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MAC.APP. 632/2015 & connected matters Page 1 of 10 1. ORAL In a vehicular accident, which took place on 14th August, 2009, JUDGMENT Vikas Sharma had died and his wife and mother had survived with grievous injuries. For...
Tag this Judgment!Mrs. Sneh Saini vs.managing Committee of Maharaja Agarsain Public and ...
Court: Delhi
$~19, 24, 31 & 33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 22, 2017 + W.P.(C) 11592/2017 W.P.(C) 11641/2017 W.P.(C) 11668/2017 W.P.(C) 11680/2017 MRS. RENU JAIN MRS. PRATIBHA GOYAL MRS. SNEH SAINI MRS. MANJU BALA ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Kamlesh Kumar, Advocate versus MANAGING COMMITTEE OF MAHARAJA AGARSAIN PUBLIC AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr.Ayush Singh Rajora, Ms.Niti Jain and Ms.Deboshree Mukherjee, Advocates for R-2 in W.P.(C) Nos.11592/2017, 11641/2017 & 11680/2017 Mr.Devesh Singh, ASC (GNCTD) with Ms.Neelam Kholiya, Advocate for R-2 in W.P.(C) No.11668/2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR1 ORDER ORAL In these petitions, a mandamus is sought to first respondent to pay the arrears of salary to petitioners in terms of orders of 11th February, 2009 and 1st July, 2016. At the outset, learned counsel for petitioners submits that to seek the relief as sought herein, representation has not W.P.(C) No.11592/201...
Tag this Judgment!News Nation Networks Private Limited vs.news Nation Gujarat and Ors.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:22. 12.2017 + C.S. (COMM) 334/2016, IA No.4525/2016 & 6625/2016 NEWS NATION NETWORKS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Versus .....Defendants NEWS NATION GUJARAT AND ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Plaintiff For the Defendants CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU :Ms Kanika Sinha and Mr Ankit Shah. :Mr Ankit Shah and Mr Kamal for D-1 & 2. JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J I.A. 6624/2016 1. The present application has been filed on behalf of defendant No.1, under Order VII Rule 10 and 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereafter CPC), inter alia, praying that the above captioned suit be dismissed as not disclosing a clear right to sue and also not disclosing the real cause of action. The applicant also seeks that the plaint be returned as this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the suit.2. The above captioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining passing o...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Hadiso Construction Pvt Ltd & Anr vs.commissioner Employees Compen ...
Court: Delhi
$~40 * % + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21. t December, 2017 FAO852016 and C.M. Appl. 6392/2016 M/S HADISO CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD & ANR....... Petitioners Through: Mr. Dr. (Maj.) J.C. Vashista, Ms. Yashika Sood, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Atul Bansal, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. M.K. Rathee, Mr. J.P. Sikka, Advocates for respondents No.3 to 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellants have challenged the order dated 09th December, 2015 whereby Commissioner, Employees Compensation has awarded compensation of Rs.7,11,080/- to respondents No.3 to 6.2.... RESPONDENTS No.3 to 6 are the widow and three daughters of late Virender Singh and they filed an application for compensation before the Commissioner, Employees Compensation claiming that late Virender Singh was employed by the appellants as a labourer for construction work at Subh Laxmi Apartments at Dwarka, N...
Tag this Judgment!Jaspreet Kaur vs.guru Harkishan Public School & Ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Order:21. December, 2017 W.P.(C) 566/2012 JASPREET KAUR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Pramod Gupta, Advocate versus GURU HARKISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS .....Respondents Through Mr.Srivats Kaushal, Advocate for R-1 and R-2 Mr.D.Rajeshwar Rao and Mr.Abhinav Srivastava, Advocates for R-3 with Mr.Manoj from DOE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) ORDER1 In this petition quashing of inquiry proceedings initiated way back on 23rd November, 2011 is sought. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the recording of evidence in the inquiry has not yet commenced and petitioners representation of 16th March, 2016 to respondent No.2-Committee has not been decided till date. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 submits that if it is so, then petitioners representation would be positively decided within a period of 12 weeks.2. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition while...
Tag this Judgment!Subodh Vir Raheja & Anr vs.bdcs Media Vision Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Delivered on:21. t December, 2017 + O.M.P.(I) 19/2017 SUBODH VIR RAHEJA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Saurabh Seth and Ms.Sumeera Seth, Advocates. versus BDCS MEDIA VISION PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The respondent is not present today. It has been served and an affidavit of service is filed by the petitioner herein stating the summons were sent at the registered office of the respondent Lift No.7(G) Ashoka Estate, 24, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi 110001 as well as at the tenanted premises A12 Sector 93 B, First Floor, Noida, Uttar Pradesh. On 16.12.2017 at the registered office. It is submitted the summons were served on the respondent by way of Registered AD Post and Speed Post. The copy of the tracking status showing Door locked-intimation served. In addition, the respondent also served through emails on its email id [email protected] and hr@pratin...
Tag this Judgment!Khemchand vs.m/s. Parveen Steels
Court: Delhi
$~13 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:21. t December, 2017 KHEMCHAND + W.P.(C) 2837/2015 Through: Ms. Sonal Singh, Advocate M/S. PARVEEN STEELS versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Through: Mr. A.K. Pandey & Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition for setting aside the impugned Award dated 15.7.2014 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court in LCA No.31/2011 titled Khem Chand v. M/s Parveen Steels.2. The brief facts of the case, as stated in the Award dated 15.7.2014, are that the petitioner joined the Management as Munim in the year 1996 at last drawn monthly salary of Rs.8,000/- and at the time of joining, he was asked by the Management to deposit Rs.1,50,000/-, out of the amount he got after retirement from BSF as security in lieu of which he was assured to be given job along with a dividend of 20% which he did. During his services, the Mana...
Tag this Judgment!