Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shanti Devi vs.digambar Jain Panchayat Samaj (Regd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-22-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI K.S. BHANDARI Date of decision:22. d December, 2017 RC.REV. 18/2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gaurav Bhardwaj & Mr. J.Mitra, Advs. Versus INTERNATIONAL SECURITY PRINTERS PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajiv Dewan & Mr. Aditya Mishra, Advs. AND + RC.REV. 204/2017 & CM No.15804/2017 (for stay) FRONTIER SALES ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Versus Mr. Praveey Pahuja, Adv. SUPERIOR EXIM PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anup J.Bhambani, Senior Advocate with Ms.Gurmeet Bindra, Adv. AND + RC.REV. 205/2017 & CM No.15807/2017 (for stay) FRONTIER SALES ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Versus Mr. Praveey Pahuja, Adv. SUPERIOR EXIM PVT LTD ..... Respondent RC.Rev.Nos.18/2016, 204-08/2017, 303/2017, 318/2017, 396-97/2017 & 519-20/2017 Page 1 of 34 Through: Mr. Anup J.Bhambani, Senior Advocate with Ms.Gurmeet Bindra...
Sh. Sameer Sharma vs.m/s Triveni Infrastructure Development Co Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-22-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. h December, 2017 Pronounced on:22. d December, 2017 CO.PET. 333/2010, CA Nos. 2375/2011, 2002/2012, 2140/2012, 1843/2013, 905/2016, 4542/2016, 4587/2016, 113/2017, 816/2017, 1113/2017, 1156-1157/2017, 1664/2011, OLR No.255/2017 SH. SAMEER SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Anup J.Bhambhani, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Jaypreet Singh, Adv. in CA Nos.2375/2011, 905/2016 versus M/S TRIVENI INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CO LTD ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Ruchi Sindhwani, Sr.standing counsel with Ms.Megha Bharara, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.CA No.4587/2016 and CA.No.905/2016 1. Both these applications pertain to the same issue as to if the Official Liquidator is liable to refund an amount of `6,01,34,307/- along with interest @ 4% p.a. to the applicant as was directed vide order dated 08.02.2016. CO.PET. No.333/2010 Page 1 of 15 2. It is the case of the Official Liquidator that an amount of `8,32,3...
Virender Singh vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-22-2017
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST.CAS. 01/2015 VIRENDER SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohan Kukreja, Advocate. versus STATE & ORS Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS Date of Decision :22. d December, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present petition has been filed for grant of Letters of Administration under Section 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 with respect to the estate of deceased Sh. Surender Singh and Late Smt. Soni Rawat.2. It is stated that Late Shri Surender Singh and Late Smt. Soni Rawat, were brother and sister-in-law of the petitioner, who expired on 16th/17th June, 2013 in the Kedarnath Temple disaster, Uttarakhand, leaving behind the following heirs: a. Virender Singh (brother of Late Sh. Surender Singh and brother-in-law of Late Smt. Soni Rawat) b. Goving Singh Rawat (Father of Late Sh. Surender Singh) c. Durga Rawat (Mother of Late Sh. Surender Singh) d. Sushila Rauthan (Sister of Late Sh. Sure...
Ms. Diba Saggar vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-22-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 22, 2017 W.P.(C) 11565/2017 MS. DIBA SAGGAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rakesh Malhotra, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr.Rishabh Sahu and Mr.Waize Ali Noor, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER ORAL CM No.47135/2017 Allowed subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) No.11565/2017 & CM Nos.47136-37/2017 1. In this petition, promotion to the post of Technical Officer (D) is sought by petitioner. There are ancillary prayers too. At the outset, learned counsel for respondent raises jurisdictional issue by pointing out that the relief sought by petitioner has to be adjudicated by Central Administrative Tribunal, Delhi. Learned counsel for petitioner draws attention of this Court to a decision of Supreme Court reported as Hari Bansh Lal Vs. Sahodar Prasad Mahto & Ors. (2010) 9 SCC655to W.P.(C) No.11565/2017 Page 1of 2 submit that writ of quo warranto lies as ...
Preeti Hiranwal vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-22-2017
$~1 & 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11539/2017 & CM Nos.47005/2017 (for stay), 47006/2017 (for exemption) PREETI HIRANWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Dr.Surender Singh Hooda, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Abha Malhotra, Advocate for R-1 & 2. + W.P.(C) 11568/2017 & CM Nos.47143/2017 (for stay), 47144/2017 (for exemption) DR. CHANDRA PRAKASH MEENA ........ Petitioner Through: Dr.Surender Singh Hooda, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Abha Malhotra, Advocate for R-1 & 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % The petitioners in both the petitions seek quashing and setting aside of ORDER2212.2017 1. their respective posting/transfer orders dated 29.11.2017 and 30.11.2017 in W.P.(C) No.11539/2017 and W.P.(C) No.11568/2017, respectively.2. At the outset, we have asked learned counsel for the petitioners to explain the need to file the photographs colle...
k.s. Bhandari vs.international Security Printers Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-22-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI K.S. BHANDARI Date of decision:22. d December, 2017 RC.REV. 18/2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gaurav Bhardwaj & Mr. J.Mitra, Advs. Versus INTERNATIONAL SECURITY PRINTERS PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajiv Dewan & Mr. Aditya Mishra, Advs. AND + RC.REV. 204/2017 & CM No.15804/2017 (for stay) FRONTIER SALES ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Versus Mr. Praveey Pahuja, Adv. SUPERIOR EXIM PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anup J.Bhambani, Senior Advocate with Ms.Gurmeet Bindra, Adv. AND + RC.REV. 205/2017 & CM No.15807/2017 (for stay) FRONTIER SALES ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Versus Mr. Praveey Pahuja, Adv. SUPERIOR EXIM PVT LTD ..... Respondent RC.Rev.Nos.18/2016, 204-08/2017, 303/2017, 318/2017, 396-97/2017 & 519-20/2017 Page 1 of 34 Through: Mr. Anup J.Bhambani, Senior Advocate with Ms.Gurmeet Bindra...
Bcci vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-22-2017
W.P.(C) 6728/2013, C.M. APPL.14592/2013 W.P.(C) 4792/2014, C.M. APPL.9548/2014 W.P.(C) 6767/2014, C.M. APPL.16010/2014 W.P.(C) 2825/2015, C.M. APPL.5077/2015 W.P.(C) 2886/2015, C.M. APPL.5179/2015 W.P.(C) 3247/2015, C.M. APPL.5819/2015 & 5820/2015 W.P.(C) 3308/2015, C.M. APPL.5928/2015 W.P.(C) 3626/2015, C.M. APPL.6472/2015 W.P.(C) 6839/2015, C.M. APPL.12508/2015 W.P.(C) 9166/2015, C.M. APPL.20893 & 20894/2015 W.P.(C) 1927/2016, C.M. APPL.8262/2016 W.P.(C) 5994/2016, C.M. APPL.24660/2016 & 24661/2016 W.P.(C) 9153/2016, C.M. APPL.37062-37063/2016 FASHION DESIGN COUNCIL OF INDIA ........ Petitioner % + W.P.(C) 2563/2013 versus $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:24. 11.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 12.2017 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 4966/2013, C.M. APPL.11216/2013, 6704/2016, 6706/2014 & 44758/2016, W.P.(C) 10729/2016, W.P.(C) 10731/2016 BCCI versus ........ Petitioner GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)2563/2013 and ...
Joginder Singh Dhaiya vs.m.a Tarde Thr Lrs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-22-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + OMP3702014 Reserved on:24. h October, 2017 Date of decision:22. d December, 2017 JOGINDER SINGH DHAIYA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.J.P.Sengh, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Aditya Nayyar, Mr.Anish Gupta, Ms.Mansha Mehta, Ms.Vaishali and Ms.Mrigna Shekhar, Advs. Tanwar Versus M.A TARDE THR LRS ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Vikas Mehta, Mr.C.V.Atre, Mr.Rajat Sehgal and Mr.Mukul Atre, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 The petitioner, by this petition, has challenged the Award dated 17th February, 2014 passed by the Sole Arbitrator whereby the application for substitution of legal representative of Mr. M.A. Tarde filed by the petitioner under Section 40 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was dismissed as being time barred and the arbitration proceedings were held to have abated.2. I, at the outset, quote the relevant finding of the arbitrator in the impugned award/order: OMP No.370/2014 Page 1 ther...
Smt. Kamlesh Kumari vs.state of Nct Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-22-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 22, 2017 W.P.(C) 11646/2017 & CMs 47348-50/2017 SMT. KAMLESH KUMARI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.D. Singh, Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh, Ms. Kamla Prasad and Mr. Jitendra Singh, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naushad Ahmed, ASC (Civil) and Ms. Urvashi Tripathi, Advocate for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner is the wife of fourth respondent, who is under employment of respondent-Directorate of Education. Upon hearing, I do find that petitioner has no locus to maintain this petition. However, it is matter of concern that though the conduct of fourth respondent is subject matter of preliminary inquiry, but the preliminary inquiry report is not forthcoming. It is so evident from respondent-Directorate of Educations Communications of 18th February, 11th April, 29th April, 17th June and 13th July, 2016. Learned Standing Counsel for resp...
Mrs. Manju Bala vs.managing Committee of Maharaja Agarsain Public and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-22-2017
$~19, 24, 31 & 33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 22, 2017 + W.P.(C) 11592/2017 W.P.(C) 11641/2017 W.P.(C) 11668/2017 W.P.(C) 11680/2017 MRS. RENU JAIN MRS. PRATIBHA GOYAL MRS. SNEH SAINI MRS. MANJU BALA ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Kamlesh Kumar, Advocate versus MANAGING COMMITTEE OF MAHARAJA AGARSAIN PUBLIC AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr.Ayush Singh Rajora, Ms.Niti Jain and Ms.Deboshree Mukherjee, Advocates for R-2 in W.P.(C) Nos.11592/2017, 11641/2017 & 11680/2017 Mr.Devesh Singh, ASC (GNCTD) with Ms.Neelam Kholiya, Advocate for R-2 in W.P.(C) No.11668/2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR1 ORDER ORAL In these petitions, a mandamus is sought to first respondent to pay the arrears of salary to petitioners in terms of orders of 11th February, 2009 and 1st July, 2016. At the outset, learned counsel for petitioners submits that to seek the relief as sought herein, representation has not W.P.(C) No.11592/201...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »