Delhi Court November 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ehsaan vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t November, 2017 CRL.A. 683/2017 UMESH GIRI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Aditya Vikram, Adv. * 7. + 8. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Radhika Kolluru, APP. SI Amit Kumar, P.S. IP Estate. CRL.A. 814/2017 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Adv. versus + EHSAAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Radhika Kolluru, APP. SI Amit Kumar, P.S. IP Estate. STATE CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I.S.Mehta, J (Oral) 1. Before us are the appeals, i.e. CRL.A. 683/2017 & CRL.A. 814/2017, for setting aside the impugned judgment on conviction dated 07.06.2017 and order on sentence dated 09.06.2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/SFTC-2, (Central), Tis Hazari CRL.A. 683/2017 & CRL.A. 814/2017 Page 1 of 9 Courts, Delhi in case No.28971/2016 in FIR No.411/2016 under Section 376-D IPC registered at police station I.P. Estate, New Delhi wherein the appellants are convicted for the offence committed under...
M/S Dish Tv India Limited vs.government of Nct of Delhi, & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2017
$~11 & 12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:01. 11.2017 + W.P.(C) 6218/2016 & C.M. 25431/2016 & 31639/2016 M/S DISH TV INDIA LIMITED, ........ Petitioner versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI, & ORS. + W.P.(C) 6219/2016 & CM No.25432/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS M/S DISH TV INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI, & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS versus : Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner(s) For the Respondent(s) CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) : Mr. A.R. Madhav Rao, Mr. Rajat Mittal and Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advs. Mr. S. Ganesh Sr. Adv. with Mr. Siddharth Dutta, Adv.1. This Court had heard the counsel for the parties. The petitioners claim is that despite the directions of the Court, its refund claim on account of the default assessments, made for the assessment year 2010-11 and 2011-12 have not been paid. W.P. (C) 6218-19/2016 Page 1 of 4 2. ...
Vinita Sharma & Anr vs.bhagwan Dass & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2017
$~15 & 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:1. t November, 2017 + MAC.APP. 560/2015 and CM127482017 VINITA SHARMA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar and Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Advocates versus BHAGWAN DASS & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vikas Chhabra and Mr. Satender Sigh, Adv. for R-1 & 3 Mr. Krish Kalra, Advocate for R-2 + MAC.APP. 239/2016 and CM131772017 BHAGWAN DASS & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Vikas Chhabra and Mr. Satender Sigh, Advocates versus VINITA SHARMA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar and Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Advocates for R-1 & 2 Mr. Krish Kalra, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. By judgment dated 01.04.2015 in accident claim case (suit no.458/2014) instituted on 09.05.2014 by the parents of the deceased Akshay Vats, they being the appellants in MACA5602015 MAC Appeal No.560/2015 & 239/2016 Page 1 of 4 (collectively, the claimants), the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Trib...
Top Forty Suspension Pvt. Ltd. Vs.top Auto Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2017
$~Finals * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CS(OS) 114/2014 Date of decision:01. 11.2017 TOP FORTY SUSPENSION PVT. LTD. Through Mr. Amit Sanduja, Advocate ..... Plaintiff versus TOP AUTO PVT. LTD. Through None. ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking recovery of a sum of Rs.1,54,48,680.60 from the defendant.2. In the plaint, it has been stated that the plaintiff has been supplying auto parts to defendant No.1 since 2000. It is claimed that as on 01.04.2010 an amount of Rs.1,25,81,610.60 is due from defendant No.1 in respect of the goods so supplied by the plaintiff to the defendant No.1. It is stated that the parties are maintaining a mutual open and current account. Various payments have been received from the defendant No.1. Last payment was made by the defendant on 05.01.2011 for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- vide cheque No.384271 drawn on ICICI Bank, Model Town Branch, Delhi. Hence, it is...
Lalit Kumar Sharma & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 136/2017 Date of decision:1. t November, 2017 LALIT KUMAR SHARMA & ORS versus ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashish Gumber, Adv. UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for respondent L&B/LAC. Mr. Pawan Mathur, Adv. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1.... Petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction and declaration that acquisition proceedings with respect to land at Khasra No.422 measuring 5 Bighas and 5 Biswas and Khasra No.423 measuring 7 Bighas and 13 Biswas situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Ghonda Gujran Khadar, Delhi are deemed to have been lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (New Act). Learned counsel...
Shri Girish Kumar vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + W.P.(C) 9555/2017 & C.M. 38886/2017 SHRI GIRISH KUMAR Date of Decision: November 01, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Romy Chacko & Mr. Amit A. Pai, Advocates Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, Central Govt. Standing Counsel with Mr. Man Mohan, Under Secretary, Ministry of Defence CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT ORAL... Petitioner is presently working as Director (Bengluru Complex) in 1. Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL). He had assumed the charge on the post of Director in Bengluru Complex in BEL on 1st May, 2016. He seeks a direction to respondents to grant deemed confirmation by virtue of Clause 2(a) of Policy Letter of 31st March, 2011 in this petition.2. The facts which are not disputed are that prior to petitioner taking up the assignment of Director, Bengluru Complex in BEL, he was working as Executive Director in the above said institution and a preliminary inquiry was i...
Pravesh Kumar Kharbanda & Ors vs.raj Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2017
$~R-387 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC APPEAL7922011 Decided on:1. t November, 2017 PRAVESH KUMAR KHARBANDA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: versus RAJ SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate for R- 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Asha Kharbanda, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 24.11.2007 due to the negligent driving of truck bearing registration no.DL-1GB-4525 by the first respondent (driver), the said vehicle being registered in the name of the second respondent (owner) and concededly insured against third party risk with the third respondent (insurer) for the period in question. She remained under treatment but succumbed to the injuries on 10.06.2008.2. On 20.10.2008, the husband and two sons of the victim instituted accident claim case (MACT suit No.633/2008) impleading the driver, owner and insurer of the said truck as party respondents, they being respondents in the same order in...
State Govt of Nct of Delhi vs.ram Gopal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2017
$~13 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 544/2017 STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Aashaa Tewari, APP. versus RAM GOPAL ..... Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI ORDER0111.2017 P.S. TEJI, J.Crl.L.P. 544/2017 & Crl.M.A153942017 (Condonation of delay) read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The State has filed the application under Section 5 of the 1. for seeking Limitation Act condonation of delay of 140 days in preferring the accompanying leave petition to challenge the impugned judgment dated 25.01.2017 passed by learned Special Judge(NDPS)/Additional Session Judge, North-West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi in S.C. No.52004/2016 in case FIR No.847/2014, registered under Section 498A/304B of IPC at Police Station Begum Pur, Delhi.2. In the application for condonation of delay, it has been submitted that the appellant could not prefer the appeal within the stipulated period as the file of the...
Aaxis Nano Technologies Pvt Ltd vs.union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~39 * + W.P.(C) 9656/2017 & CM Nos.39280-39281/2017 AAXIS NANO TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. A.J.Bhambhani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajat Arora, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC for UOI with Mr. S.K. Kataria, Under Secretary. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA ORDER0111.2017 % 1. Notice.2. Mr. Ajay Digpaul, Standing Counsel accepts notice for the Union of India.3. 4. In view of the order, the petition was heard finally. The writ petitioners grievance is that though its tender for procurement of 584 Digital Water Level Recorders (DWLR) was accepted, without any rhyme or reason, the Central Ground Water Board procuring agency cancelled the letter of acceptance.5. The tender for the articles was issued on 22.12.2006; a pre-bid meeting was held between the agency, on the one hand, and the representatives of the bidders, W.P.(C) No.9...
Shobhit Srivastava & Ors. Vs.national Thermal Power Corporation (Ndpc) ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2017
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 01, 2017 W.P.(C) 5861/2017 SHOBHIT SRIVASTAVA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Alakh Alok Srivastava, Advocate versus NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATION (NDPC) LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Taneja and Ms. Shaheen, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) In this petition, compassionate appointment is sought by first petitioner in view of untimely death of his father, who was working as Senior Manager in National Thermal Power Corporation (hereinafter referred to as NTPC).2. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that as per Clause 5.8 of the Memorandum of Agreement (Annexure P-3) between the employees and the employer/respondent-NTPC, an employee is entitled to compassionate appointment. However, the stand of respondent-NTPC in its counter affidavit is that the Memorandum of Agreement (Annexure P-3) is applicable to workmen and not to Officer Class which inclu...
- ‹ Prev
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 91
- Next ›
- Last »