Delhi Court November 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
s.k. Sharma vs.b.l. Verma & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
$~39 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 1241/2017 S.K. SHARMA Through: Mr. Yudhishter Sharma & Mr. ........ Petitioner Keshav Parashar, Advs. Versus Through: None. B.L. VERMA & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER0211.2017 ........ RESPONDENTS CM Nos.39487-88/2017 (both for exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. CM(M) 1241/2017 & CM No.39486/2017 (for stay) 3. The petition has been received post lunch on listing on urgent mentioning and has been taken up at 1535 hours.4. 5. The counsel for the petitioner / plaintiff has been heard. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the orders [dated 16th August, 2017 and 25th September, 2017 in CS DJ No.75286/2016 of the Court of Additional District Judge-II (ADJ), District North-West, Rohini Courts, Delhi]. closing the right of the petitioner / plaintiff to cross-examine DW1 and dismissing the application of the petitioner / plaintif...
Saregama India Limited vs.the Indian Singers Rights Association & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:02. d November 2017 RFA (OS)(COMM) 16/2017 SAREGAMA INDIA LIMITED ..... Appellant versus THE INDIAN SINGERS RIGHTS ASSOCIATION & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS + RFA (OS)(COMM) 17/2017 SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant versus THE INDIAN SINGERS RIGHTS ASSOCIATION & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS + RFA (OS)(COMM) 18/2017 SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED versus ..... Appellant THE INDIAN SINGERS RIGHTS ASSOCIATION & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellants : Mr Chander M.Lall, Senior Advocate with Mr Ankur Sangal and Ms Sucheta Roy, Advocates in RFA(OS) (COMM) 16/2017 Mr Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr Neel Mason, Mr Ankit Relan, Ms Ridhima Pabbi, Mr Uday Singh Chopra and Ms P.Vennela, Advocates in RFA(OS) (COMM) 17/2017 & 18/2017 RFA(OS)(Comm) Nos.16/2017 & RFA(OS)(Comm) Nos.17/2017 RFA(OS)(Comm) Nos.18/2017 Page 1 of 16 For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Su...
M/S Shree Ganesh Metals vs.glencore International Ag & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :2. d NOVEMBER, 2017 CS(COMM) 154/2017 + M/S SHREE GANESH METALS Through : Mr.V.K.Garg, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Noopur Dubey and Mr.Anupam Kirti, Advocates. ..... Plaintiff versus GLENCORE INTERNATIONAL AG & ANR ..... Defendants Through : Mr.Ciccu Muklupadhyan, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Priyanka Sharma and Mr.Gautam Saroop, Advocates, for D-1. Mr.Rizwan with Mr.Sharique Hussain, Advocates for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) IA No.4550/2017 (u/S45of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by defendant No.1) 1. In a suit for Declaration, Permanent Injunction and Recovery of $ 12 lacs (`8 crores approximately) filed by the plaintiff against the defendants, application under Section 45 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act (hereinafter referred to as The Act) has been filed on behalf of the defendant No.1 to invoke arbitration agreement. It is contested by the plaintiff. CS(Comm) 154/2017 Page 1 of 12 2. De...
j.h.jewelers vs.umed Chindaliya & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:02.11.2017 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Manav Gupta, Ms. Esha Dutta, versus Mr. Sahil Garg and Mr. Anupam Pandey, Advocates CS(COMM) 180/2017 J.H.JEWELERS UMED CHINDALIYA & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Dalip Mehra with Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Advocate for D-1 & 2 Mr. Ateev Mathur, Mr. Amol Sharma & Ms. Jagriti Ahuja, Advocate for D-4 $~OS-3 * % + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) IA No.11683/2017 1. This application is filed under Order 14 Rule 5 of CPC by defendant nos. 1 and 2 for amendment of issues framed on 18.09.2017. As per the application, the applicant seeks modification of issue nos. 4,5,6 & 7 and seeks 2 additional issues.2. The plaintiff has filed the present suit seeking recovery of Rs. 10,17,42,312/-. The case of the plaintiff is that defendant no.1 who was working at the post of accountant with the plaintiff had opened an account with defendant no.4 bank without complying with the KYC n...
The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs.bhawna Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
$~R-394 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:2. d November, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.841/2011 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. versus BHAWNA DEVI & ORS. Through: None. ....... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 27.06.2010, a motor vehicular accident took place involving truck bearing registration No.DL1G3025(the truck), it being driven in a rash manner by the seventh respondent resulting in death of Sanjay Kumar, giving rise to cause of action in favour of first to sixth respondents (collectively, the claimants) to institute accident claim case (suit No.405/2010) on 27.08.2010. The appellant insurance company (insurer) was added to the fray, it concededly having issued an insurance policy against third party risk in respect of the offending vehicle. The tribunal after inquiry, by judgment dated 23.07.2011, held that the accident and death had occurred due to the negligent driving of the t...
Central Secretariat Club vs.geetam Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved On:27. h October, 2017 Pronounced on:2. d November, 2017 + W.P (C) No.17474/2004 and CM APPL No.13101/2004 CENTRAL SECRETARIAT CLUB ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Satya Narayan Vashishth and Ms. Meena Kumar, Advocates versus GEETAM SINGH Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate ..... Respondent And + W.P (C) No.19106/2005 GEETAM SINGH ........ Petitioner Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate Through: versus CENTRAL SECRETARIAT CLUB .... Respondent Through: Mr. Satya Narayan Vashishth and Ms. Meena Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT % 1. Under challenge, in the present writ petition, is an award, dated 16th July, 2004, whereby the Labour Court No.VII (hereinafter W.P.(C) No.17474/2004 & W.P.(C) No.19106/2005 Page 1 of 28 referred to as the Labour Court) has directed payment, by the Central Secretariat Club (hereinafter referred to as The Club) of Rs.15,240/-, to the workman Geetam Singh, for the period October, 1992 ...
Super Cassettes Industries Private Limited vs.the Indian Singers Right ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:02. d November 2017 RFA (OS)(COMM) 16/2017 SAREGAMA INDIA LIMITED ..... Appellant versus THE INDIAN SINGERS RIGHTS ASSOCIATION & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS RFA (OS)(COMM) 17/2017 AND RFA (OS)(COMM) 18/2017 + + Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellants : Mr Chander M.Lall, Senior Advocate with Mr Ankur Sangal and Ms Sucheta Roy, Advocates in RFA(OS) (COMM) 16/2017 For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr Neel Mason, Mr Ankit Relan, Ms Ridhima Pabbi, Mr Uday Singh Chopra and Ms P.Vennela, Advocates in RFA(OS) (COMM) 17/2017 & 18/2017 Mr Sudhir Chandra, Senior Advocate with Mr Pravin Anand, Mr Dhruv Anand, Ms Udita Patro and Mr Shamim Nooreyezaan, Advocates for R Mr Prabhakar Meher, Advocate for R-2 & 3 in RFA(OS) (COMM) 16/2017 & 17/2017 Mr Sanjay Agnihotri and Ms Madhuri Yadav, Advocates for R-2,3 & 4 in RFA(OS) (COMM) 18/2017 Mr Rakesh Kumar, Advocate for R-2 to 5 in RFA(OS) (COMM)17...
Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Company Ltd vs.master Tehseem @ Ahs ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:2. d November, 2017 + MAC.APP. 1021/2016 & CM No.447CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta along with Ms. Suman Bagga, Advs. versus MASTER TEHSEEM @ AHSEN & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The first respondent had instituted accident claim case (MACA.No.223/2013) on 09.09.2013 seeking compensation on the grounds that while travelling in jeep bearing registration No.HR-39B- 3692 (in Delhi) on 08.08.2013, it being driven by the second respondent in a negligent manner, he had suffered injuries since the said driver had lost control over the vehicle and hit the side wall of the flyover. The jeep is shown by the evidence on record to have been registered in the name of the third respondent and insured against third party risk for the period in question with the appellant (insurer). The said driver, owner and the insurer w...
Suresh Kumar vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
$~21 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:02. d November, 2017 + W.P.(C) 6872/2015 SURESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Vishal Maan, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for L&B/LAC with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, adv. Mr.Arun Birbal, Mr.Sanjay Singh and Mr.Rohan Mehra, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks a direction to declare the entire acquisition proceedings in respect of land of the petitioner admeasuring 1 bigha 9 biswas comprised in Khasra No.1148 (2-18), New Khasra Nos.395 and 114, situated in revenue estate of village Mehrauli, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as subject land) under the Land Acquisition Act,1894 to have lapsed in view Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Re-Settlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter refer...
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation vs.hadeesun Nisha & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:02. d November, 2017 + MAC.APP. 1061/2013 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Garima Prasad, Advocate versus HADEESUN NISHA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through :Mr. Peeush Sharma, Mr. Shaurya Mitra Tomar and Mr. Kartikey Nayyar, Advocates for the review petitioner CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM No.37184/2016 (Exemption) 1. Allowed subject to just exceptions. CM No.37183/2016 (condonation of delay) 2. For the reasons given in the application, the delay in filing the review petition is condoned and the application is allowed. Review Petition 458/2016 3. By judgment dated 04.04.2016 on MACA10612013 of Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (UPSRTC), the judgment of the tribunal dated 01.10.2013 in the accident claim case (MACT1142011) instituted by the applicants herein (first to fifth respondents in appeal) was modified and the amount of compensation due to the...
- ‹ Prev
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- Next ›
- Last »