Delhi Court November 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jamna Dass & Ors vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
$~18, 19, 20, 24, 25, 28, R-39 & R-43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:2. d November, 2017 + W.P.(C) 5393/2015 JAMNA DASS & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Aagney Sail, Adv. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for L&B/LAC. Mr. Vikas Sood, Ms. Anusuya Salwan and Ms. Renuka Arora, Advocates for DSIIDC. ........ Petitioners + W.P.(C) 5526/2015 DIWAN SINGH & ANR Through Mr. Aagney Sail, Adv. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for L&B/LAC. Mr. Vikas Sood, Ms. Anusuya Salwan and Ms. Renuka Arora, Advocates for DSIIDC. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Aagney Sail, Adv. ZILE SINGH & ORS + W.P.(C) 5673/2015 GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS W.P. (C) No.5393/2015 etc. Page 1 of 10 Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. fo...
Geetam Singh vs.central Secretariat Club
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved On:27. h October, 2017 Pronounced on:2. d November, 2017 + W.P (C) No.17474/2004 and CM APPL No.13101/2004 CENTRAL SECRETARIAT CLUB ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Satya Narayan Vashishth and Ms. Meena Kumar, Advocates versus GEETAM SINGH Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate ..... Respondent And + W.P (C) No.19106/2005 GEETAM SINGH ........ Petitioner Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate Through: versus CENTRAL SECRETARIAT CLUB .... Respondent Through: Mr. Satya Narayan Vashishth and Ms. Meena Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT % 1. Under challenge, in the present writ petition, is an award, dated 16th July, 2004, whereby the Labour Court No.VII (hereinafter W.P.(C) No.17474/2004 & W.P.(C) No.19106/2005 Page 1 of 28 referred to as the Labour Court) has directed payment, by the Central Secretariat Club (hereinafter referred to as The Club) of Rs.15,240/-, to the workman Geetam Singh, for the period October, 1992 ...
M/S Mohandas v Rajani vs.national Highways Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Reserved on:11. 09.2017 Pronounced on:02. 11.2017 ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI M/S MOHANDAS V RAJANI $~ * + W.P.(C) 6719/2017, C.M. APPL.27989/2017 + W.P.(C) 6720/2017, C.M. APPL.27991/2017 M/S MOHANDAS V RAJANI versus versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Appearance: Mr. Varun Pathak and Ms. Sowmya Saikumar, Advocates for petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Madhu Sweta and Ms. Kanika Tandon, Advocates for NHAI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT1 The petitioner (hereafter referred to as Mohandas) is aggrieved that its bid in response to the Notice Inviting Tender ("NIT") inviting two W.P.(C) Nos.6719/2017 & 6720/2017 Page 1 of 17 separate bids for Short Term Improvements & Routine Maintenance Work of sections of Porbandar-Bhiladi-Jetpur; (Km. 0.000 to Km.117.600) of NH-8B...
Punjab National Bank vs.ms. Bharti Sehgal and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:02. 11.2017. CM(M) 760/2016 & CM No.26681/2016(stay) PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Nishi Chaudhary, Advocate versus MS. BHARTI SEHGAL AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Rakesh Mukhija, Mr.M.Miglani & Mr.Gaurav Miglani, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. By the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 12.01.2016 passed by the appellate court confirming the interim order passed by the trial court in favour of respondent No.1 in a suit filed by respondent No.1. The petitioner was restrained from interfering in the peaceful possession of the plaintiff/respondent No.1 of the suit property. The plea of the petitioner that the suit is barred under the SARFAESI Act was rejected.2. The brief facts are that respondent No.1/plaintiff has filed a suit for permanent and mandatory injunction claiming he...
Vandana Sharma vs.sarva Priya Parashar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:2. d November, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.1090/2016 VANDANA SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vishal Sharma, Mr. Anish versus Shreshtha, Mr. Sagar Mukherjee & Mr. Nishchal Joshi, Advs. SARVA PRIYA PARASHAR ..... Respondent Through: Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appeal is directed against the judgment dated 06.08.2016 of the Tribunal whereby the claim petition (petition No.194/2014) of the appellant was dismissed.2. The appellant claims to have suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 02.02.2014 at about 7.30 p.m. near Qutub Minar Metro Station, Mehrauli, New Delhi on Gurgaon- Mehrauli Road. As per her case, she was hit by motorcycle bearing registration No.DL1N6065driven in a rash or negligent manner by the respondent. The police had registered a criminal case vide first information report (FIR) No.170/2014 at Police Station Mehrauli, for investigation into o...
Dilip Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 27, 2017 Judgment Delivered on: November 02, 2017 CRL.A. 828/2017 DILIP KUMAR STATE Through: Ms. Sonika Tyagi, Advocate ..... Appellant versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Rajni Gupta, APP for the State with SI Azad Singh PS Ranhola CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT1 By way of this appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., the appellant assails the judgment dated 29th November, 2016 and order on sentence dated 5th December, 2016 whereby the appellant has been convicted for committing the offence punishable under Sectionof IPC & Section 6 of POCSO Act and sentenced as under:-"(i) Under Section 363 IPC (ii) Under Section 366 IPC R.I. for a period of 3 years with fine of ` 3,000/- and in default, to undergo SI for fifteen days R.I. for a period of 5 years with fine of ` 3,000/- and in default, to undergo SI for fifteen days CRL.A. No.828/2017 Page 1 of 11 (iii) Under Section 6 of POCSO Act R.I. fo...
National Insurance Co Ltd vs.rama Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:2. d November, 2017 + MAC.APP. 1006/2015 & CM No.31940/2015 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Adv. versus RAMA DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On the accident claim case (suit No.79/2015) instituted by first to fourth respondents (collectively, the claimants), the tribunal, by judgment dated 04.11.2015, awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs. 22,16,044/- on account of death of Raju in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 13.12.2014 due to the negligent driving of a motor vehicle which was insured with the appellant (insurer) for the period in question against third party risk. The tribunal directed the tribunal to pay the said amount with interest at 9% per annum, it including loss of dependency at Rs. 19,81,044/-, the income of the deceased having been assessed primarily as Rs.8632/- on the basis of MAC Appeal N...
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pooja & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
$~R-389 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:02. d November, 2017 + MAC APPEAL7982011 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Suman Bagga and Mr. POOJA & ORS. Pankaj Gupta, Advocates versus Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The first to third respondents (collectively, the claimants) had instituted accident claim case (case no.473/2010) on 18.10.2010 in the wake of a detailed accident report (DAR) submitted by the local police on the basis of investigation into the corresponding criminal case (first information report) that had been registered, seeking compensation under Sections 166 and 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 on account of the death of Jitender Uppal in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 15.08.2010 due to the negligent driving of a motor vehicle described as Tavera bearing registration no.DL-1YA-9291. From amongst the parties which were impleaded as respon...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.aanchal Verma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:2. d November, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.529/2017 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.K. Tripathi, Adv. versus AANCHAL VERMA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Manasi Sahoo, Adv. for R- 2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) On the accident claim case (MACT146172015) of the first 1. respondent (claimant) instituted on 07.06.2012, the tribunal, by its judgment dated 28.03.2017, awarded compensation in the sum of Rs. 5,83,338/- on account of injuries suffered by her in motor vehicular accident that occurred on 02.03.2012 due to negligent driving of a vehicle insured with the appellant insurance company (insurer), fastening the liability on it (the appellant) to pay the said amount with interest @ 12 % per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization.2. The insurer is in appeal raising grievance only concerning the rate of interest. Notice was issued to the claimant by ...
Yuvraj & Ors. Vs.ramu Verma @ Rahul & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
$~R-392 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC APPEAL8362011 Decided on:2. d November, 2017 YUVRAJ & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus RAMU VERMA @ RAHUL & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Priyadarsi Acharya for Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Dharam Raj Pandey, then aged 56 years, a widower, died in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 04.02.2008 due to negligent driving of a motorcycle bearing registration no.DL-4S-BK-2759 (the motor cycle) by Ramu Verma @ Rahul (first respondent), since deceased and substituted by his father. The three sons and one married daughter of Dharam Raj Pandey, they now being the appellants (collectively, the claimants), instituted accident claim case (MACT101910/2008) on 27.03.2008 seeking compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 impleading Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. (insurer) as the second respondent, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- Next ›
- Last »