Delhi Court November 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Naresh Kumar Jain vs.s Shanmuga Sundaram
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d November, 2017 RC.REV. 283/2017 NARESH KUMAR JAIN ........ Petitioner Through Mrs. Inderjeet Saroop, Advocate. versus S SHANMUGA SUNDARAM .... Respondent Through Mr.Prashant Katara and Mr. Soin Khan, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This Rent Control Revision Petition under Section 25-B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act impugns the order (dated 28th March, 2017 in E.No.6394/2016 of the Court of Additional Rent Controller, New Delhi) of grant of leave to the respondent to defend the petition for eviction under Section 14(1) (e) of the Act filed by the petitioner.2. The petition was entertained and notice thereof ordered to be issued. Respondent has been served and the counsel for the respondent appears. The Counsels have been heard and the copies of the eviction proceedings on record perused.3. Counsel for the respondent in his argument has not challenged that the petitioner is the owner of the ...
Khazan Singh & Ors. Vs.govt .Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:03. 08.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:02. 11.2017 W.P. (C) 5515/2015, CM APPL.9920/2015 AZAD @ ANAND SINGH & ORS. Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Respondents W.P. (C) 7143/2015, CM APPL.13107/2015 KHAZAN SINGH & ORS. Petitioners Versus GOVT .OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Respondents Present: Mr. Sanjay Parikh with Mr. Aagney Sail and Ms. Maulshree Pathak, Advocates for petitioners. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate. Ms. Anusuya Salwan, Advocate for DSIIDC with Mr. Abhishek Pundir, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. GARG S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. All the petitioners in these writ proceedings, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, claim benefit of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (for short, 2013 Act). The W.P.(C)5515/2015 & 7143/2015 Page ...
M/S Khemwals Store & Ors vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7672/2017 & CM No.31726/2017 M/S KHEMWALS STORE & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr Pardeep Gupta, Mr Parinav Gupta, Mr Mansi Gupta and Mr Moazzam Ali, Advocates. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr Sanjoy Ghose, ASC, GNCTD with Ms Uri Mohan & Mr Rishabh Jetley, Advocate for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0211.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under:-"WRIT of Certiorari be issued for quashing the impugned orders dated 22.08.2017/23.08.2017 regarding Selection/issue of FPS Licence No.9385, 9387 & 9386 circle no.2 Burari in favour Respondent no.4 to 6 issued by Respondent no.3 Writ of mandamus be issued directing the... RESPONDENTS to re- consider... Petitioner No.1 to 3 for selection and allot the respective Fair Price Shop Licence No.9385, 9386 & 9387 to the petitioners as per regulation 3 of Delhi specified ar...
The Oriental Insurance co.ltd. Vs.sangeeta & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
$~3 & 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:02. d November, 2017 + MAC.APP. 456/2008 and CM394292017 THE ORIENTIAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate + MAC.APP. 459/2008 and CM No.39430/2017 PREMO AND OTHERS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jyotindra Kumar, Adv. for R-4 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA SANGEETA & ORS JUDGMENT (ORAL) Through: Mr. Jyotindra Kumar, Adv. for R-6 ........ RESPONDENTS 1. These two appeals are directed against a common judgment passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal on 23.04.2008 (Tribunal) in two accident claim cases, one (suit no.107/2000) instituted by the first respondent in MACA4562008 and, the other, (suit no.108/2000) instituted by the first to third respondents in MACA4592008, the former seeking compensation for injuries of the said first respondent and the latter seeking compensation on account ...
Daimler Financial Services (P) Ltd. Vs.commissioner of Trade & Taxes
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 3424/2017 Date of decision:2. d November, 2017 $~9, 11, 12, 20 & 21 * + IJM CORPORATION BERHAD ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Rajesh Jain, Mr. Virag Tiwari, Ms.Aastha Gandhi, Mr.V.K. Jain, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES ..... Respondent M.V.OMNI PROJECTS (INDIA) LTD. Satyakam, ASC Through : Mr. for GNCTD with Ms.Trisha, LA, DTT, GNCTD. WITH W.P.(C) 4561/2017 ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Rajesh Jain, Mr. Virag Tiwari, Ms.Aastha Gandhi, Mr.V.K. Jain, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Mr.R.A. Iyer, Advocate. DAIMLER FINANCIAL SERVICES (P) LTD. WITH W.P.(C) 5792/2017 Through : Mr. Rajesh Jain, Mr. Virag Tiwari, Ms.Aastha Gandhi, Mr.V.K. Jain, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus W.P. (C) Nos. 3424/2017+connected Page 1 of 18 COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Satyakam, ASC for GNCTD with Ms.Trisha, LA, DTT, GNCTD. WITH FEM...
Kent Ro Systems Ltd & Anr. Vs.mr Jiten Aggarwal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1468/2016 & I.A.No.1532/2017 KENT RO SYSTEMS LTD & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Rajeshwari H. with Mr.Kumar Chitranshu, Advocates. versus MR JITEN AGGARWAL & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr.Nitin Sharma with Mr.Bharat Kumar and Mr.Dhavish Chitkara, Advocates. Date of Decision:02. d November, 2017 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN MANMOHAN, J (Oral) JUDGMENT1 On 11th July, 2017, learned counsel for defendant no.4 undertook to remove any alleged infringing listing within two days of being informed by the plaintiffs specifying the details of such listing or other data, link or communication. The defendant No.4 also undertook to disclose the names and address of the infringing parties, who had uploaded the infringing material on their websites. He had further stated that in the event the plaintiffs informed the defendants of any alleged illegal listing on their e- mail ID, namely, [email protected], requisite legal acti...
M/S Arcadia Shares and Stock Brokers Pvt Ltd vs.harmanprit Singh Sidhu
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
$~6 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI OMP2942014 Date of decision:2nd November, 2017 M/S ARCADIA SHARES AND STOCK BROKERS PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr. PR Raghav Bansal and Mr. Shaswat, Advs versus HARMANPRIT SINGH SIDHU ..... Respondent Through Mr. Anand Shankar, Adv CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, M/s Arcadia Shares and Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd challenging the Award dated 10th September, 2013 passed by the Appellate Arbitral Tribunal, National Stock Exchange of India in Appeal. A. M. No.F&O/D- 0081/2012.2. The respondent had opened a D-MAT account with the petitioner and had issued a cheque No.418234 dated 14th June, 2011 for an amount of Rs.13.5 lacs in favour of the petitioner for trading in equity segment. Claiming that various transactions had been OMP2942014 Page 1 transacted by the petitioner without the consent or knowledge of the respondent, including transfer of sum of Rs....
Khemchand and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:02. d November, 2017 + W.P.(C) 10288/2015 KHEMCHAND AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Prateek Kohli, Ms.Sumi Anand and Ms.Richa Oberoi, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Chiranjeev Kumar and Mr.Mukesh Sachdeva, Advts. for R-1/UOI. Mr.Siddharth Panda, Adv. for L&B/LAC Mr.Arun Birbal, Mr.Sanjay Singh and Mr.Rohan Mehra, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Mr.Panda submits that the counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the LAC in Registry vide diary no.263091 dated 26.05.2017 but the same is not on record. An additional copy of the counter affidavit has been handed over in court. Registry is directed to trace the counter affidavit and place the same on record.2. With the consent of counsels for the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. In the present wr...
National Insurance Co Ltd vs.sumit Sharma & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:2. d November, 2017 + MAC.APP. 440/2017 & CM Nos. 17233-34/2017 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Adv. ..... Appellant versus SUMIT SHARMA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. for R CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On the accident claim case (MACP No.39/2016) instituted by the first respondent (claimant) on 27.11.2015, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, by its judgment dated 20.01.2017, awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs. 1,20,15,456/- on account of injuries and permanent disability suffered due to the motor vehicular accident that took place on 19.09.2015 at about 10.p.m., involving negligent driving of car bearing registration No.DL4 ND0153 admittedly insured against third party risk for the period in question with the appellant (insurer). The tribunal fastened the liability on the insurer to pay the said amount with interest @ 9% per annum, the amount ...
Ijm Corporation Berhad vs.commissioner of Trade & Taxes
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 3424/2017 Date of decision:2. d November, 2017 $~9, 11, 12, 20 & 21 * + IJM CORPORATION BERHAD ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Rajesh Jain, Mr. Virag Tiwari, Ms.Aastha Gandhi, Mr.V.K. Jain, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES ..... Respondent M.V.OMNI PROJECTS (INDIA) LTD. Satyakam, ASC Through : Mr. for GNCTD with Ms.Trisha, LA, DTT, GNCTD. WITH W.P.(C) 4561/2017 ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Rajesh Jain, Mr. Virag Tiwari, Ms.Aastha Gandhi, Mr.V.K. Jain, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Mr.R.A. Iyer, Advocate. DAIMLER FINANCIAL SERVICES (P) LTD. WITH W.P.(C) 5792/2017 Through : Mr. Rajesh Jain, Mr. Virag Tiwari, Ms.Aastha Gandhi, Mr.V.K. Jain, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus W.P. (C) Nos. 3424/2017+connected Page 1 of 18 COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Satyakam, ASC for GNCTD with Ms.Trisha, LA, DTT, GNCTD. WITH FEM...
- ‹ Prev
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- Next ›
- Last »