Delhi Court November 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State Govt of Nct of Delhi vs.rameshwar Manna
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2017
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 252/2017 and Crl.M.A. No.7040/2017 STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, Additional Public Prosecutor along with SI Sandeep Sharma, PS-Vasant Kunj (North), for the State. versus RAMESHWAR MANNA Through: Mr. Manjeet Godara, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI ORDER0311.2017 % P.S. TEJI, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. No.7040/2017 (Condonation of delay of 48 days in filing the leave petition) read with Section 482 of Cr. P.C. The State has filed the application under Section 5 of the 1. Limitation Act for seeking condonation of delay of 48 days in preferring the accompanying leave petition to challenge the impugned judgment dated 08.12.2016 passed by learned Additional Session Judge, New Delhi in case FIR No.437/2014, registered under Section 328/376/506 of IPC at Police Station Vasant Kunj (North), Delhi.2. In the application for condonation of de...
Mohd. Irshad vs.suresh Bala & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % MOHD. IRSHAD FAO No.427/2017 3rd November, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Deepika Raghav, Advocate. versus SURESH BALA & ORS. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ........ RESPONDENTS To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.39419/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. CM No.39420/2017 (delay of 230 days in filing the appeal) For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the appeal is condoned subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. FAO No.427/2017 1. This first appeal under Order XLIII(1)(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff impugning the FAO No.427/2017 Page 1 of 6 order of the trial court dated 9.1.2017, by which the trial court has dismissed the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC filed by the appellant/plaintiff.2. The facts of the case are that the appellant/plaintiff filed the su...
Vipin Kumar vs.state of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2017
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:3. d November, 2017 + CRL.M.C. 5084/2015 and Crl.M.A.No.18321/2015 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Shiv Chopra and Mr.Mayank versus Mishra, Advocates. VIPIN KUMAR STATE OF DELHI1 1.2. ARK FLUID SYSTEM COMPONENTS PVT. LTD. Through: Mr.Raghuvinder Varma, APP for ........ RESPONDENTS State. Mr.Manoj Ohri, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Rahul Sharma, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT I.S. MEHTA, J.1. Instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner-Vipin Kumar seeking quashing of the impugned order dated 26.10.2015 passed by the learned Civil Judge, South East, Saket Court, New Delhi in CC. No.14/2013.2. Brief facts as per the complaint are that the respondent No.2- Ark Fluid System Components Pvt. Ltd. is a company duly incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 with its registered office at F-7B, Okhla Industrial Area-I, New De...
M/S. L’oreal vs.shri Yogesh Jethi & Another.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2017
* % + M/S. LOREAL Represented by: Mr.Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Kapil Kumar Giri and Mr. Vinay Shukla, Advocates. versus ..... Plaintiff .....Defendants IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:3. d November, 2017 CS(COMM) 567/2017 Represented by: None. SHRI YOGESH JETHI & ANOTHER. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. As per the plaint, the plaintiff prays for the following reliefs: a) For a decree of permanent injunction restraining all the defendants by themselves as also through their individual proprietors/partners, agents, representatives, distributors, assigns, heirs, successors, stockists and all others acting for and on their behalf from using, selling, soliciting, exporting, displaying, advertising or by any other mode or manner dealing in or using the impugned trade mark LOREAL with or without the word PARIS or any other word/mark which may be identical with and/or deceptively similar word/mark to the plaintiffs said trade mark/trade name LOR...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.sitali Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2017
$~1 & 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM (M) 570/2013 Decided on:3. d November, 2017 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani with Mr. P. Acharya, Adv. Versus SMT. CHAND KUMARI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Deepak Maharaj, Adv. for R-1 & 2. + MAC.APP. 457/2013 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani with Mr. P. Acharya, Adv. Versus SITALI DEVI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Deepak Maharaj, Adv. for R-1 & 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Accident Claim case (MACT No.73/2012) had been instituted on 10.01.2012 by four claimants, they being Sitali Devi, Chand Kumari, Sunny Kumar, Sonu Kumar, being the mother, wife CM (M) 570/2013 & conn. Page 1 of 5 and minor sons respectively of Shyam who had died in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 12.10.2011. The claim case was decided by the tribunal, by judgment dated 01.03.2013, returning a finding that ...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.mrs. E. John & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2017
$~R-401 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC APPEAL9022011 Decided on:3. d November, 2017 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A. Jain, Adv. for Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Adv. versus MRS. E. JOHN & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Accident claim case (MACT No.01/02/2011) was registered on 13.12.2002, initially by Mr. F. John (fourth respondent) seeking compensation on account of death of his son Deepak John in motor vehicular accident which had occurred on 02.10.1999, involving Maruti Van bearing registration no.DL-6C-B-9328 (the van). Later, Mr. F. John was transposed as a respondent to the said proceedings, the claim case having been passed by his wife E. John (first respondent) and Ms. Anna, minor daughter of Late Deepak John (second respondent). The case initially presented under Section 166 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 was converted, midway the proceedings, into one under Section 163A of Moto...
Nokia Corporation & Ors vs. Movieexpress & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:30. h October, 2017 Pronounced on:03. d November, 2017 + CS(OS) 286/2012, IA Nos. 2228/2012, 5097/2012, 5099/2012, 7917/2012 NOKIA CORPORATION & ORS ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.Neeraj Grover and Mr.Naqeeb Nawab, Advs. versus MOVIEEXPRESS & ORS ..... Defendant Through : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The plaintiff has filed this suit for declaration, permanent injunction for restraining, passing off of trade mark, delivery up and recovery of damages. In this suit the plaintiff has prayed for declaration that plaintiffs trademark is a well known trademark in India. Further the plaintiff has sought a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their directors, partners, proprietors, distributors, agents etc. from advertising, airing songs, publishing, publicizing, offering for viewing, the impugned movie under the title Mr.NOKIA and/or Mr. NO.KEYIA and/or Mr. NA-VKIA and/or offer...
m.s. Gehlot vs.bses Rajdhani Power Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2017
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 03, 2017 W.P. (C) 1201/2001 M.S. GEHLOT Through: Mr. Rajesh Banati and Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocates with petitioner in person ........ Petitioner versus BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar and Mr. V. Mehta, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL)... Petitioner, a Meter Reader with respondent, was charged of conniving with one Umed Singh whose premises, he had checked in February, March and April, 1994, but had not reported about large scale theft of electricity which was taking place at the factory premises of said Umed Singh in Peeragarhi, Delhi. In the departmental inquiry, petitioner was exonerated by Inquiry Officer, who in order of 13th May, 1999 (Annexure P-5) had accepted petitioners stand that there was no theft of electricity at the time of petitioners visits to premises of Umed Singh and so, no question of sending any report or intimation of...
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -9 vs.wsp Consultants India Pvt. Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2017
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2017 ITA9352017 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -9 ..... Appellant WSP CONSULTANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. versus ..... Respondent Mr. Kamal Sawhney and Mr. Shikhar Garg and Mr. Prashant Maherchandani, Advs : : Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Adv. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) CM No.39550/2017 (condonation of delay) For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. Application is disposed of. ITA9352017 1. The Revenues appeal urges that the impugned order to the extent it excluded three comparables in ALP determination, of the assessees income, is erroneous. ITA9352017 Page 1 of 4 2. The assessee is subsidiary of Cyprus based company and is a global business provider involved in design, engineering, management consultancy services ac...
Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.ramkali & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2017
$~R-399 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:3. d November, 2017 + MAC.APP. 874/2011 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. versus RAMKALI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arihant Jain, Adv. for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 08.03.2009, Jitender Kumar was on board bus bearing registration No.DL1B6235(the bus), as a labourer, it plying on stage carriage route No.502, in the territory of Delhi when the bus had reached the traffic signal on Tilak Marg red light and Bhagwan Das Road at about 5.00 a.m. it came to be involved in a collision with truck bearing registration No.HR55D4914(the truck). As a result of the impact, the bus caught fire, Jitender Kumar suffering 100% burns and dying in the consequence, this becoming subject matter of investigation by the police through first information report (FIR) No.52/2009 under Sections 279/337/304A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) of polic...
- ‹ Prev
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- Next ›
- Last »