Delhi Court November 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S R B Enterprises vs.jai Deep Goel
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:6. h November, 2017 + + TR.P.(C.) 18/2017 M/S R B ENTERPRISES ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.P.D. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Adv. JAI DEEP GOEL Versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Anjali Chopra, Advocate TR.P.(C.) 20/2017 AVNEET GOYAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.P.D. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Adv. JAI DEEP GOYAL ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Anjali Chopra, Advocate. Versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 These petitions, under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), seek transfer of Suits being CS No.518/2016 (renumbered as CS No.13173/2016) titled Shri Avneet Goyal vs. Shri Jai Deep Goyal and Suit being CS No.519/2016 (renumbered as CS No.13174/2016) titled Shri Jai Deep Goel vs. M/s R.B. Enterprises both of the Court of Ms. Vandana Chauhan, Additional District Judge-15, (Central District), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi to this Court.2. Notice of the petitio...
Shruti Co-Operative Group Housing Society vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & A ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10430/2015 & CM No.26160/2015 SHRUTI CO-OPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY Through: Mr G. S. Chaturvedi and Mr R. ........ Petitioner Madhav Bera, Advocates. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Siddhartha Shankar Ray, Advocate for R-1 & 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0611.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner a Group Housing Society has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 27.03.2012 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the Deputy Conservator of the Forests, Government of NCT of Delhi acting as a 'Tree Officer' under the Delhi Preservation of Trees Act, 1994 (hereafter the Act) whereby a compounding fee of `4,50,000/- has been imposed on the petitioner society for illegal felling of trees. The petitioner also impugns a notice dated 30.09.2015 issued for recovery of the aforesaid compounding fee with interest as an arrears of land revenue.2. Briefly s...
Navjot Pal Singh Randhawa & Anr vs.delhi Development Authority & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
$~17&18 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON:06. 11.2017 LPA1832016, CM APPL.9871-9872/2016 RAKESH NARANG ..... Appellant versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent LPA1842016, CM APPL.9880/2016 & 41018/2016 NAVJOT PAL SINGH RANDHAWA & ANR ..... Appellants versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS.... RESPONDENTS Appearance: Mr. Sandeep Bajaj with Ms. Soayib Qureshi and Ms. Akanksha Nehra, Advocates for appellant in LPA1832016. Mr. Ved Prakash Sharma with Ms. Amrit Kaur Oberoi and Ms. Abha Sharma, Advocates for appellant in LPA1842016. Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA with Mr. Udyan Khandelwal, Advocate, in both appeals. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. By the common impugned order, the learned Single Judge of this Court dismissed two writ petitions which had sought directions and ITA183& 184/2016 Page 1 of 10 intervention of the Court against the DDA and the other respondents f...
Kanwar Pal vs.reliance General Insurance Pvt. Ltd. And Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
$~406 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:06. h November, 2017 + MAC APPEAL9512011 KANWAR PAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Peeush Sharma, Mr. Kartikey Nayyar and Mr. Sahurya Mitra Tomar, versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE PVT. LTD. AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The present appeal was filed by the claimant at whose instance accident claim case (MACT10852010) was instituted on 19.07.2008. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) by judgment dated 21.07.2011, inter alia, held that he had made out a case for compensation to be awarded under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the respondents, he having suffered injuries in the motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 23.03.2008 when the motorcycle bearing registration no.UP-11G-0439, on which he was riding, was hit by Maruti Wagon-R car bearing registration no.HR- 06L-5577. The tribunal held the second respondent (driver of the s...
Himani Malhotra vs.indraprastha College for Women
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 06, 2017 + W.P.(C) 9771/2017 HIMANI MALHOTRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. G. Tushar Rao & Mr. Mayank Sharma, Advocates Versus INDRAPRASTHA COLLEGE FOR WOMEN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh K. Gogna, Mr. Rijul Singh Uppal, Mr. Akhilesh Sagar & Mr. Vipra Bhardwaj, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT ORAL W.P.(C) 9771/2017 & C.M. 39772/2017 & C.M. 39773/2017 1. In a departmental inquiry, petitioner is being proceeded against on the charge of insubordination, desertion etc. and she had filed an application seeking production of prospectuses of respondent- Indraprastha College for Women from the year 2001 to 2011, which stands declined by the Inquiry Officer vide impugned order of 7th October, 2017 (Annexure P-2 colly). Vide another order of even date, the Inquiry Officer has also rejected petitioners application for summoning of Principal as a witness.2. Both these applications were filed by ...
Nisha & Anr vs.vikram Singh & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:6. h November, 2017 + MAC.APP. 961/2017 & CM No.39748/2017(exemption) NISHA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. versus VIKRAM SINGH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants had instituted on 21.07.2017 accident claim case (ID No.11246/2017) before Motor Accident Claims Tribunal of North East District, Karkardooma Court Complex, seeking compensation on account of death of their daughter Nargis in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 05.04.2017 in the State of Uttar Pradesh. The claimants (the appellants) have described themselves as residents of D-815, Gali no.20C, Bhajanpura, Delhi, 110053 which, if correct, would confer the jurisdiction on the tribunal to entertain the claim petition under Section 166(2) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. It appears the claimants had submitted a copy of their Aadhaar card as prima facie proof of such r...
Suman Lata Sharma vs.vinod Kumar Sharma & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through: Mr. Vikash Sharma, Advocate. ..... Plaintiff CS(OS) 1149/2015 & I.As. 8721-8722/2015 SUMAN LATA SHARMA21$~ * + % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN VINOD KUMAR SHARMA & ORS versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Dharm Vir Singh, Advocate for defendants No.1 and 2. Date of Decision:03. d November, 2017 MANMOHAN, J (Oral) JUDGMENT1 Present suit has been filed for partition, possession, cancellation of Relinquishment Deed dated 16th June, 2011 and permanent injunction.2. Plaintiff has primarily instituted the present suit for a declaration that the Relinquishment Deed executed and registered by her in favour of her brothers-defendants No.1 and 2 respectively with respect to an immovable property left by the father of the parties was got executed from her fraudulently on the promise of being paid Rs.1 crore. It is stated that on the date of execution of the Relinquishment Deed only Rs.10 lacs was paid to the plaintiff. In support of the said ...
Beena Gupta & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: November 03, 2017 % + W.P.(C) 2913/2016, CM No.12171/2016 BEENA GUPTA & ORS. Through: Mr. Prateek Kohli, Adv. with Ms.Richa Oberoi, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: Mr. C.M. Goyal, Adv. for UOI ..... Respondent Mr. Arun Birbal, Adv. with Mr. Sanjay Singh & Mr. Rohan Mehra, Adv. for DDA Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Adv. for L&B with Ms. Vasundhara Nayyar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners claim that the acquisition proceedings pertaining to land measuring 1203 sq. yards and 212 sq. yards forming part of khasra No.657 (min) & 67respectively situated in the revenue estate of village Neb Sarai, Tehsil Hauz Khas, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as subject land) has lapsed by virtue of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter...
M/S Kamdhenu Limited vs.m/s Aashiana Rolling Mills Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :6. h SEPTEMBER, 2017 DECIDED ON :3. d NOVEMBER, 2017 CS(OS) 360/2017, IAs 101(Delay) & 101(Delay) M/S KAMDHENU LIMITED Through : Mr.Akhil Sibal, Sr.Advocate with Mr.S.K.Bansal, Mr.Ajay Amitabh Suman & Mr.Kapil Kumar Giri, Advocates. ..... Plaintiff Versus Through : Mr.C.M.Lal, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Kapil Wadhwa, Ms.Devyani Nath, Mr.Rupin Bahl & Ms.Nancy Roy, Advocates. M/S AASHIANA ROLLING MILLS LTD ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + S.P.GARG, J.IA128722017 (u/O XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 CPC) in CS(OS) 360/2017 1. In a suit for Permanent Injunction to restrain infringement of registered design under the Design Act, 2000, Rendition of Accounts, Delivery up, etc., the instant IA has been filed by the plaintiff to seek interim injunction till the disposal of the suit. It is contested by the defendant.2. Plaintiffs case as projected in the plaint is that the plaintiff is a company duly incorporated under the provisions of Compa...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.hari Om Const. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2017
$~13 & 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC APPEAL4642011 Decided on:3. d November, 2017 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. versus HARI OM CONST. & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Kharwar, Adv. AND + MAC APPEAL7822011 HARI OM Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Kharwar, Adv. versus LEKH RAJ SINGH & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-3 Constable Hari Om, the claimant (appellant in MAC Appeal 1. No.782/2011) was on official duty with his colleague Constable Rajinder Singh, both moving on motor cycle on 17.02.2009 when their vehicle was hit by a tempo bearing registration no.HR38K7828(the MAC Appeal No.464 & 782/2011 Page 1 of 6 tempo) in the area of Police Station Kashmiri Gate, Delhi causing injuries to each of them. Two accident claim cases were instituted, including one (suit no.268/2009) on 17.07.2009 by the claimant. In each case, the drive...
- ‹ Prev
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- Next ›
- Last »