Delhi Court November 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lalit Kumar Tokas vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order Reserved on:8. h November, 2017 Order Pronounced on:22ndNovember, 2017 BAIL APPL. 2169/2017 & Crl.M.A.17603/2017 SANJAY KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Deepender Hooda, Mr. Sidharth Chopra, Mr. Pranvir Sethi & Mr. Mohit Bhandari, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ....Respondent Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State with SI Rakesh Yadav from P.S. Vasant Vihar. + BAIL APPL. 2170/2017 & Crl.M.A.17605/2017 LALIT KUMAR TOKAS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Deepender Hooda, Mr. Sidharth Chopra, Mr. Pranvir Sethi & Mr. Mohit Bhandari, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ....Respondent Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State with SI Rakesh Yadav from P.S. Vasant Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 The present petitions have been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as BAIL APP...
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.sukhram Sagar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
$~R-535 & 536 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. d November, 2017 + MAC.APP.728/2012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath with Mr. Saurabh Kumar Tuteja, Advocates versus Through: None. ..Respondents DHARAM PAL & ORS + MAC.APP.731/2012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath with Mr. Saurabh Kumar Tuteja, Advocates versus SUKHRAM SAGAR & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Through: None. JUDGMENT (ORAL) ..Respondents 1. By a common judgment dated 15.03.2012, the Tribunal decided two accident claim cases, one (suit No.161/10) instituted by the first respondent in MAC. Appeal No.728/2012 and, the other (suit No.163/10), instituted by the first respondent in MAC. Appeal No.MAC App. No.728/2012 &731/2012 Page 1 of 3 731/2012. Both the claim cases had arisen out of the same motor vehicular accident wherein the respective claimants had suffered injuries due to negligent driving of motor vehicle described...
New India Assurance co.ltd. Vs.lalita Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
$~R-544-546 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 757/2012 Decided on:-"22nd November, 2017 SMT. LALITA DEVI & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. versus SH. MUKESH KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. + MAC.APP.842/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. ..Appellant Through: None. versus SHAILENDRA KUMAR & ORS. .Respondents Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. + MAC.APP. 843/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. ..Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. LALITA DEVI & ORS. ..Respondents Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 19.03.2010, a motor vehicular accident took place involving negligent driving of motor vehicle described as tempo bearing MAC App. No.757, 842 & 843/2012 Page 1 of 5 registration No.DL-1LE-7450 which was admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant (insurer) for the period in question, it resulting in Avdhesh Kumar and Shailendra Kumar sufferi...
In the Matter of Polymer Land Private Ltd. (In Vol. Liqn.) Vs......... ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
$~CP-31 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO.PET. No.61/2017 Date of decision:22.11.2017 IN THE MATTER OF POLYMER LAND PRIVATE LTD. (IN VOL. LIQN.) ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rishi Manchanda, Adv. for OL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (herein referred to as the Act), by the Official Liquidator (OL) for voluntary winding up of POLYMERLAND PRIVATE LIMITED (herein referred to as the said company).2. The said Company was incorporated on 13.06.1995 under the provisions of the Act with the Registrar of Companies (ROC), having authorized share capital of Rs. 6,25,00,000/- divided into 62,50,000 equity shares of Rs. 10/- each.3. The registered office of the said company is situated within the territory of NCT of Delhi at 3rd Floor, AIFACS Building, Rafi Marg, New Delhi.4. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 490 of the Act and other applicable provision of the Act, the sa...
Sewaram & Ors. Vs.land Acquisition Collector & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:22. d November, 2017 + W.P.(C) 1457/2015 SEWARAM & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for L&B/LAC Mr. Pawan Mathur, Standing Counsel for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL No.41066/2017(direction) 1. Counsel for the petitioners submit that by the present application he prays that the date 06.02.2018 may be cancelled and the matter may be heard at an early date.2. The prayer made in this application is not opposed. Accordingly, the application is allowed. The date fixed on 06.02.2018 stands cancelled.3. The application is disposed of. CM.APPL No.39779/2016 4. The application is dismissed as not pressed, in view of the order passed in CM.APPL410662017. CM.APPL No.7339/2016(delay) 5. This is an appli...
m.c.d. Vs.ravi Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI M.C.D. OMP2732008 OMP2742008 Reserved on :10. h November, 2017 Date of decision:22. d November, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Mini Pushkarna, Ms.Vasundhara Nayyar and Ms.Anushruti, Advs. versus RAVI KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Anusuya Salwan, Ms.Renuka Arora, Ms.Nikita Salwan and Mr.Sumit Rana, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 These petitions under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) have been filed by the petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi challenging the arbitration award dated 10th January, 2008 passed by the Sole Arbitrator. Though the disputes between the parties arise out of two separate Work Orders and separate reference of the same were made by this Court in petitions filed under Section 11 of the Act, the Sole OMP Nos.273, 274/2008 Page 1 Arbitrator has adjudicated such disputes by way of a common award dated 10th January, 2008. The challeng...
Mohd. Aafaq vs.mujeeb Rehman & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :22. d NOVEMBER, 2017 FAO4592017 + MOHD. AAFAQ MUJEEB REHMAN & ORS ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Raj K.Chandiwal, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Arpit Bhargava, Advocate for R1. Mr.Joby P.Varghese, Advocate for R2 & R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. Present appeal has been preferred by the appellant Mohd. Aafaq to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 05.06.2017 of learned Addl. District Judge whereby application under Order XXXIX Rule 1&2 CPC in Suit No.970/2017 was dismissed. It is contested by the respondents.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. The appellant has filed the suit seeking specific performance and permanent injunction on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding-cum-Agreements executed on 16.05.2011 and 15.07.2011. The respondents have alleged that both these MOUs are forged and fabricated.3. During the co...
Up State Road Transport Corporation vs. Avdhesh Singh & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
$~R-543 & 543A * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. d November, 2017 + MAC APPEAL7532012 and CM121912012 UP STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: None versus ..... Appellant AVDHESH SINGH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Kavita Tyagi for Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate + MAC APPEAL3722015 AVDHESH SINGH & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Kavita Tyagi for Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus UP STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: None ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Master Karan @ Situ, a child aged 12 years, was travelling with his mother in a bus bearing registration no.UP-30A-5822 from Hardoi in U.P. to Delhi on 02.06.2008, the bus concededly belonging to Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation(UPSRTC) driven by its MAC Appeal No.753/2012 & 372/2015 Page 1 of 4 employee, Saravjit Singh. The driver had lost control over the vehicle and it ended up hitting against a stationary bus, this resulting in the chil...
Jammu and Kashmir State Road Transport Corporation vs.building Mainten ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:22. 11.2017 + W.P.(C) 10387/2017 & C.M. 42412/2017 JAMMU AND KASHMIR STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION versus BUILDING MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE (TIS HAZARI COURTS COMPLEX) AND ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr. Sumeet Verma, with Mr. Aman Choudhary, Advs. Mr. Viraj R. Datar with Mr. A. Vashistha, Advs. for R-1 Ms. Shruti Munjal, Mr. Bhanu Gupta, proxy counsel for Mr.Ankur Chhiber, Adv. for R-2 CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) CM No.42413/2017 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P. (C) 10387/2017 The petitioner-Jammu & Kashmir State Road Transport Corporation 1. W.P.(C) 10387/2017 Page 1 of 4 (in short Corporation) is aggrieved by an order made by the Registrar General, Delhi High Court, which cited an earlier ...
Virender Singh Gahlot and Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: November 22, 2017 W.P.(C) 10394/2017 & CMs 42436-38/2017 VIRENDER SINGH GAHLOT AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Aruneshwar Gupta and Mr. Varun Dewan, Advocates Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC & Ms. Deboshree Mukherjee, Advocate for respondents No.1, 2 & 6 Mrs. Biji Rajesh, Advocate for Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate for respondent No.3 Ms.Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel & Ms. Anushruti, Advocate for respondent No.4- SDMC Mr. Kumar Rajesh Singh and Ms. Punam Singh, Advocates for respondent No.5-EDMC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In this writ petition, petitioners seek setting aside of the entire examination process conducted by respondents on 29th October, 2017 for recruitment of 4366 posts of Primary Teachers with three Municipal Corporations of Delhi.2. There is a preliminary jurisdictional objection to entertain this writ by learned counsel for...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »