Delhi Court November 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.dharam Pal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
$~R-535 & 536 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. d November, 2017 + MAC.APP.728/2012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath with Mr. Saurabh Kumar Tuteja, Advocates versus Through: None. ..Respondents DHARAM PAL & ORS + MAC.APP.731/2012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath with Mr. Saurabh Kumar Tuteja, Advocates versus SUKHRAM SAGAR & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Through: None. JUDGMENT (ORAL) ..Respondents 1. By a common judgment dated 15.03.2012, the Tribunal decided two accident claim cases, one (suit No.161/10) instituted by the first respondent in MAC. Appeal No.728/2012 and, the other (suit No.163/10), instituted by the first respondent in MAC. Appeal No.MAC App. No.728/2012 &731/2012 Page 1 of 3 731/2012. Both the claim cases had arisen out of the same motor vehicular accident wherein the respective claimants had suffered injuries due to negligent driving of motor vehicle described...
New India Assurance co.ltd. Vs.shailendra Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
$~R-544-546 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 757/2012 Decided on:-"22nd November, 2017 SMT. LALITA DEVI & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. versus SH. MUKESH KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. + MAC.APP.842/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. ..Appellant Through: None. versus SHAILENDRA KUMAR & ORS. .Respondents Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. + MAC.APP. 843/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. ..Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. LALITA DEVI & ORS. ..Respondents Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 19.03.2010, a motor vehicular accident took place involving negligent driving of motor vehicle described as tempo bearing MAC App. No.757, 842 & 843/2012 Page 1 of 5 registration No.DL-1LE-7450 which was admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant (insurer) for the period in question, it resulting in Avdhesh Kumar and Shailendra Kumar sufferi...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-6 vs.matrix Cellular International Serv ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. 11.2017 ITA4842017 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 . Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary Sr. Standing Counsel and Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. Standing Counsel. versus MATRIX CELLULAR INTERNATIONAL SERVICES PVT. LTD. .... Respondent Through: Mr. Himanshu Sinha with Ms. Vrinda Tulshan, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA * + S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J (ORAL) % 1. These appeals by the Revenue, under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), impugn the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench (ITAT), dated 17.10.2016, for the assessment year (AY) 2009-10.The ITAT allowed the assessees appeal. The Revenue, in this appeal, urged three questions. By order dated 04.08.2017, this Court declined to frame questions on the issue of disallowance under Section 14A, as well as the issue of advertisement expenditures. The Court issued notice only on ...
Mattel, Inc. & Anr vs.ms. Aman Bijal Mehta & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
$~16 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 803/2017, IA No.13724/2017 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1&2 of the CPC) and IA No.13728/2017 (under Section 151 CPC for hearing in camera). MATTEL, INC. & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms. Tush Malhotra & Ms. Rashi Punia, Advs. Versus MS. AMAN BIJAL MEHTA & ORS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER2211.2017 ..... Defendants IA No.13727/2017 (under Section 149 read with Section 151 of the CPC for extension of time for making up deficiency in court fees).1. Accepting the undertaking of the counsel for the plaintiffs to deposit the appropriate court fees latest on or before 27th November, 2017 and binding the plaintiffs thereto, the application is disposed of.2. If the court fees is not so paid, the Registry to list the suit for dismissal. IA No.13726/2017 (for exemption).3.4. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. IA No.13725/2017 (under Order XI Rule 1(4) ...
M/S Lifelong Meditech p.ltd vs.m/s United India Insurance co.ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + OMP(COMM) 569/2016 Reserved on:7. h November, 2017 Date of decision:22. d November, 2017 M/S LIFELONG MEDITECH P.LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Sameer Nandwani and Ms.Pooja Tandon, Advs. versus M/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr.A.K. De and Ms.Ananya De, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner M/s Lifelong Meditech (P) Ltd. challenging the Arbitral Award dated 16.09.2016 passed by the Sole Arbitrator in case reference No.DAC/935/04/15.2. The dispute between the parties has arisen out of a Comprehensive Standard Fire & Special Perils Policy No.041100/11/12/11/00000021 for a sum of Rs. 40,61,03,196/- taken by the petitioner from the respondent. The policy was valid from 01.04.2012 to 31.03.2013. Another policy covering stocks i.e. Floater Policy No.041100/11/12/1...
Commissioner of Police and Ors. Vs.pratap Singh Meena
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~30. * + W.P.(C) 3483/2017 & CM APPL. 15254/2017 (stay) COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS. Through: Mr.Santosh Kumar Kr. Tripathi, ASC Mr. Rizwan, Advocate. ........ Petitioners 1. versus PRATAP SINGH MEENA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manjit Singh Ahluwalia, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % ORDER2211.2017 Appearance is entered by learned counsel for the respondent, who states that he has received a complete set of the paper book. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for disposal today itself.2. The petitioners/Delhi Police are aggrieved by the order dated 30.08.2016, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in an O.A. filed by the respondent, who was working on the post of a Sub-Inspector in the Delhi Police and had assailed the punishment of censure imposed on him by the petitioners vide order dated 15.01.2013, duly upheld by the Appellate Authority, vide order dated 10.09....
Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.reena & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
$~R-538 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. d November, 2017 + MAC APPEAL7352012 and CM119192012 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arun Yadav, Advocate versus REENA & ORS. Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. In calculating the loss of dependency, on account of death of Ravinder Kumar in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 10.10.2011 due to negligent driving of a motor vehicle described as Tempo bearing registration no.DL-1LM-2391 (tempo), on the basis of evidence led during inquiry into accident claim case (suit no.557/2011) instituted by the first to fourth respondent (collectively, the claimants), the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) concluded, by judgment dated 04.04.2012 that the income of the deceased was Rs.15,000/- p.m. It is this finding which is questioned by the appeal at hand.2. Having heard the learned counsel for the insurance company and having...
Santoshi vs.rajeev Choudhary & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
$~R-532 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC APPEAL7202012 Decided on:22. d November, 2017 SANTOSHI Through: None versus ..... Appellant RAJEEV CHOUDHARY & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi and Ms. Komal Dhingra, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant had suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 05.03.2006. The accident claim case (suit no.549/10) was instituted on 01.06.2007 to seek compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), by judgment dated 23.11.2011, while accepting the case that the injuries had been suffered by her due to negligent driving of Tata Sumo bearing registration no.DL-1V-3596 by the second respondent and holding him to be the principal tort feasor, awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs.3,45,000/-, inter alia, on the basis of conclusion that she suffers from permanent functional disability to the extent ...
Heritage River Cruises Private Limited & Anr vs.pandaw Cruises Pte Ltd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d November, 2017. CS(OS) 2056/2010 HERITAGE RIVER CRUISES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Pankaj Bhatia, Ms. Nupur Goel, Mr. Ashish Chaudhury and Mr.Dhruv Surana, Advs. ..... Defendants Versus PANDAW CRUISES PTE LTD & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 Through: None. The two plaintiffs namely Heritage River Cruises Private Limited (earlier known as M/s Pandaw Cruises India Private Limited) and Raj Singh, who is the Director of the plaintiff No.1, have instituted this suit against the defendants No.1&2 Pandaw Cruises PTE Limited and Paul Graham Robert Strachan, for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from issuing derogatory, defamatory, humiliating, intimidating and baseless statements adversely affecting the business, reputation and goodwill of the two plaintiffs.2. It is the case of the plaintiffs in the amended plaint dated 12th March, 2012, (i) that the plaintiff No.1 w...
Aaxis Nano Technologies Pvt. Ltd vs.s::can Messtechnik Gmbh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~31 * + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 481/2017 Date of decision:22. d November, 2017 AAXIS NANO TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD......... Petitioner Through Mr.Anup J.Bhambhani, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rajat Arora and Mr.Jaypreet Singh, Advs. versus S::CAN MESSTECHNIK GMBH ..... Respondent Through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) IA No.13764/2017 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 481/2017 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred as the Act) seeking interim order of stay against the termination letter dated 27.10.2017 issued by the respondent. OMP(I)(COMM) 481/2017 Page 1 2. The petitioner and the respondent have been granted a contract dated 11.07.2016 by the Central Pollution Control Board (hereinafter referred as to CPCB) for Continuous Real Time Water Quality Monitoring Data (herei...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »