Delhi Court November 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sohan Lal & Others vs.govt. Of n.c.t. Of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2017
$~4 * % + W.P.(C) 2584/2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. d November, 2017 1. SOHAN LAL & OTHERS Through: Ms.Aruna Mehta, Advocate versus ........ Petitioners GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Satyakam, ASC for GNCTD with Mr.Akshay Agarwal, Advocate. Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Samrat Nigam, Mr.Abhimanyu Walia, Ms.Jaya Verma, Advocates for respondent no.2, BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. SI Sachin Yadav, P.S. Vikas Puri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) On 3rd May, 2007, Baby Sanjana aged about 6 years and Baby Kali, aged about 4 years were playing in the street in front of house No.JG-II/508, Vikas Puri when Baby Sanjana accidentally touched the electricity pole No.48. Baby Kali tried to rescue her but she also got stuck to the pole as the electric current was flowing in the said pole. Amarjeet standing outside his shop, ran to the spot and separated the girls from the electric pole with the help of...
Jaswant Singh & Anr vs.i.n.chaudhary
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2017
$~ 5 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :-"23rd November, 2017 CM(M) 271/2015 & CM No.5587/2015 JASWANT SINGH & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. R.P. Sharma, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kr. Verma, Advocate. I.N.CHAUDHARY CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioners have initiated eviction proceedings against the respondent on the ground of second default in payment of rent in terms of Section 14(1)(a) read with Section 14(2) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (DRC Act). The proceedings in the said case, presently registered as E-29/2011, are pending on the file of the Rent Controller-West, Delhi. It appears that in earlier proceedings, on the ground under Section 14(1)(a) of DRC Act, upon finding being returned that the respondent had been in default, he having complied with order under Section 15(1) of DRC Act, the case stood closed with benefit of Section 14(2) of DRC Act having been accorded. CM(M) 271/2015 Pag...
Meera Dewan vs. Raman Dewan & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % MEERA DEWAN CS (OS) No.360/2016 22nd November, 2017 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, Ms. Seerat Singh, Advocates RAMAN DEWAN & ORS. versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Arjun Singh Bawa, Ms. Vishakha Gupta, Advocates for defendants 1 & 2. Ms. Sonali Chopra, Advocate for defendants 4 & 5. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) IA No.13740/2017 (U/O VII Rule 11 CPC filed by defendant nos. 4&5) 1. This is an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC filed by the defendant nos. 4 and 5 seeking to reject the plaint or for deleting the defendant nos. 4 and 5 as the defendants in the suit. In effect by the subject application suit is prayed for being rejected/dismissed as against defendant nos. 4 and 5. The averments CS(OS) No.360/2016 Page 1 of 6 in the present application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC show that applicants/defendant nos. 4 and 5 are seeking rejection of ...
New Delhi Municipal Council vs.v3s Infratech Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + OMP(COMM) 369/2017 10th November, 2017 Date of decision:22. d November, 2017 Reserved on: NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Vipul Ganda, Mr.Raghav, Mr.Mohit Domman, Advs. versus V3S INFRATECH LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Praveen Kumar Singh, Mr.Utkarsh Singh, Md.Ziauddin Ahmad, Mr.Avi Batra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner New Delhi Municipal Council challenging the Arbitral Award dated 16th June, 2017 passed by the Sole Arbitrator. The petitioner confines challenge only to issue No.11 and 15 decided by the Sole Arbitrator.2. The disputes between the parties arise out of the work contract awarded by the petitioner in favor of the respondent for the upgradation and re-modeling of Palika Bazar, New Delhi vide Agreement No.19/EE (Bm-II) 2009-10 dated 22...
M S Manju Natha Naik vs.union of India Through the Secretary and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
$~36. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 385/2013 1. M S MANJU NATHA NAIK ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Pandey, Advocate with Mr. H.S. Tiwari, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND ORS Through: Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr. Kushal Kumar, Advocate and Mr. M.I. Agrawal, JD, Legal, BRO in person. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia ORDER2211.2017 for issuance of a writ of certiorari, for quashing the investigation conducted against him by the respondents, including the Court of Inquiry proceedings that have resulted in initiation of disciplinary action against him and issuance of the attachment order dated 08.01.2013.2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Court of Inquiry, wherein material was gathered and the statements of witnesses recorded, did not comply with the provisions of Rule 180 of the Army Rules ...
New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.beena Yadav and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
$~R-537 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP.729/2012 Decided on :22. d November, 2017 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate. versus BEENA YADAV AND ORS Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 31.08.2008, a motor vehicular accident had occurred involving negligent driving of motor vehicle described as TATA407bearing registration No.UP-16-3227 and as a result of injuries suffered Sagar Yadav died. His wife and six other members of the family dependent upon him (they being first to seventh respondents, collectively, the claimants) instituted accident claim case (Suit No.741/2008) on 24.10.2008. The Tribunal held inquiry and returned a finding that the accident had been caused due to negligent driving of the said vehicle by Arbind Giri (the driver and eighth respondent in the appeal). As per the material available before the Tribunal, the vehicle was registered in the name of Sudhi...
The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs.seema Sharma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
$~R-526 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC APPEAL7072012 Decided on:22. d November, 2017 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. Priyadarsi Acharya, ... Appellant versus Advocate SEEMA SHARMA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Peeush Sharma and Mr. Shaurya Mitra Tomar, Advocates for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On the accident claim case (MACT case no.370/10/09) instituted on 18.11.2009 by the first respondent (claimant), the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) by judgment dated 25.04.2012, awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs.13,37,002/- fastening the liability on the appellant / insurer to pay, it admittedly having issued an insurance policy covering third party risk in respect of the offending vehicle described as Tata 407 bearing registration no.HR- 56-0069. The award includes Rs.5,90,400/- towards loss of future income, on the basis of conclusion that the claimant has suffered functional disability to the ext...
Deputy Commissioner (West) & Anr vs.kuldeep Singh & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
$~25 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:22. 11.2017 LPA6222016 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (WEST) & ANR...... Appellants versus KULDEEP SINGH & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellants For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr J.M.Kalia : Mr J.P.Sengh, Senior Advocate with Mr Raghu Verma, Ms Udita Sharma, Ms Manisha Mehta, Ms Vaishali Tanwar and Ms Mrigna Shekhar for R-1 & 2. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICESANJEEV SACHDEVA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) LPA6222016& CM Nos.41497/2016(stay), 41496/2016(delay in filing petition for 129 days) The appellants have preferred an appeal against the order of the 1. learned Single Judge who directed the Revenue Secretary, the Government of NCT of Delhi, to decide the request of the writ petitioners within four weeks.2. The brief facts are that the village Mundka was notified for consolidation in 1972. On 24.03.1992, the lands in the village were vested in the Gao...
In the Matter of e.f.educational Tour Pvt. Ltd.(in Vol. Liqn.) Vs..... ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
$~CP-32 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22.11.2017 CO.PET. No.62/2017 IN THE MATTER OF E.F.EDUCATIONAL TOUR PVT. LTD.(IN VOL. LIQN.) ..Petitioner Through Mr. Rishi Manchanda, Adv. for OL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition, filed under Section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956(herein referred to as the Act), by the Official Liquidator (OL) for voluntary winding up of E.F.EDUCATIONAL TOURS PRIVATE LIMITED (herein referred to as the said company).2. The said Company was incorporated on 23.01.2006 under the provisions of the Act with the Registrar of Companies (ROC), having authorized share capital of Rs. 25,00,000/- divided into 2,50,000 equity shares of Rs. 10/- each.3. The registered office of the said company is situated within the territory of NCT of Delhi at 12, Bhagat Singh Marg, New Delhi.4. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 490 of the Act and other applicable provisions of the Act, the said Company ...
Sanjay Kumar vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order Reserved on:8. h November, 2017 Order Pronounced on:22ndNovember, 2017 BAIL APPL. 2169/2017 & Crl.M.A.17603/2017 SANJAY KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Deepender Hooda, Mr. Sidharth Chopra, Mr. Pranvir Sethi & Mr. Mohit Bhandari, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ....Respondent Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State with SI Rakesh Yadav from P.S. Vasant Vihar. + BAIL APPL. 2170/2017 & Crl.M.A.17605/2017 LALIT KUMAR TOKAS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Deepender Hooda, Mr. Sidharth Chopra, Mr. Pranvir Sethi & Mr. Mohit Bhandari, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ....Respondent Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State with SI Rakesh Yadav from P.S. Vasant Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 The present petitions have been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as BAIL APP...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »