Delhi Court November 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
I N Chaudhary vs.dr Jaswant Singh & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2017
$~8 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d November, 2017 CM(M) 421/2017 & CM144832017 I N CHAUDHARY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Kr. Verma, Advocate. versus DR JASWANT SINGH & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Through: Mr. R.P. Sharma, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner is a respondent in the proceedings arising out of the eviction petition No.257(new), 1(old) initiated by the respondents herein seeking his eviction on the ground under Section 14(1)(e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.2. By the impugned order dated 27.03.2017 the right of the petitioner to lead evidence was closed taking note at length of the dilatory tactics adopted by him or at his instance by his counsel, some reference to the previous conduct of the counsel having also been made in the order.3. After some hearing, the learned counsel for the respondents submitted that though the order and the reasons set out therein cannot be faulted, in all fair...
New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.ragini Chaudhary & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2017
$~R-550 & 551 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d November, 2017 + MAC.APP.780/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Priyadarsi Acharya, Advocate versus RAGINI CHAUDHARY & ORS Through: None. + MAC.APP.996/2012 RAGINI CHAUDHARY & ANR Through: None. versus .Respondents ..... Appellants NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD & ORS .Respondents Through: Mr. Priyadarsi Acharya, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Ranjit Kumar Chaudhary, then aged 33 years, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 17.10.2004, due to negligent driving of motor vehicle described as truck bearing registration No.HR-38J-9901 and died in the consequence. His wife and minor son (collectively, the claimants) instituted accident claim MAC App. No.780/2012 & 996/2012 Page 1 of 5 case (MACT Suit No.913/08) on 30.08.2005, alleging that the accident had occurred due to negligence on the part of Rahishuddin (the driver). The Tribunal hel...
Vishambhar & Anr vs.uday Bhan Yadav & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2017
$~R-549 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC APPEAL7672012 Decided on:23. d November, 2017 VISHAMBHAR & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar and Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Advocates versus UDAY BHAN YADAV & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shoumik Mazumdar, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Pinto, a bachelor, aged 19 years, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 10.07.2007 due to negligent driving of a motor vehicle described as Crane bearing registration no.HR-55-F-2193 admittedly insured against third party risk with the third respondent (insurer) for the period in question and died in the consequence. On the accident claim case (MACT44610/07) instituted on 18.08.2007 by his parents (appellants), the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) held inquiry and awarded Rs.4,82,000/- as compensation with interest at the rate of 7.5% p.a. fastening the liability on the insurer to pay. The said amount includes...
Hardya Dass vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d November, 2017 CRL.A. 679/2017 HARDYA DASS ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Ajay Verma, Mr. Narsingh STATE Narain Rai and Mr. Upendra Yogesh, Advocates. versus Represented by: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for State ..... Respondent with SI Satyawan, PS Uttam Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By this appeal, the appellant challenges his conviction for offence punishable under Sections 342/376/506 IPC vide the impugned Judgment dated 7th May, 2014 and the order on sentence dated 8th May, 2014 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years for offence punishable under Section 376 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for two years for offence punishable under Section 506 (II) IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months for offence punishable under Section 342 IPC.2. Learned counsel for the appellant contends that appellant was falsely implicated at the instance of mother of the...
I N Choudhary vs.dr Jaswant Singh & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2017
$~7 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d November, 2017 CM(M) 367/2017 & CM No.12963/2017 I N CHOUDHARY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Kr. Verma, Advocate. versus DR JASWANT SINGH & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Through: Mr. R.P. Sharma, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner is respondent in the proceedings arising out of eviction case registered as E-29/2015 (new No.25785/16) instituted by the opposite party presently pending on the file of Rent Controller-West at Tis Hazari Courts.2. By the impugned order dated 10.03.2016, the right of cross- examination of the witness of the petitioner in the eviction case was closed, since the Rent Controller was not ready to give adjournment on the ground that the counsel representing the petitioner had to attend chautha ceremony of an acquaintance, taking note of the fact that the case is of senior citizen meriting expeditious proceedings.3. The learned counsel for the respond...
Mr. Raman Deep Singh Taneja vs.crown Realtech Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 444/2017 Date of decision:23. d November, 2017 MR. RAMAN DEEP SINGH TANEJA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rakesh Mukhija, Adv. versus CROWN REALTECH PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sonam Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the petitioner seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation with the allotment of unit in Abacus Technopark located at 12/4, Delhi Mathura Road, 20 KM Stone, Near Sarai Khwaja, NH-02, Faridabad, Haryana.2. In the terms and conditions for allotment, the arbitration agreement is contained in clause-24 which is reproduced hereinunder:-"In the event of any dispute/differences between the Company and/or the intending Allottee(s)/ buyer in ARB.P.No.444/2017 Page 1 to the same shall be referred respect of an...
Rajender Singh vs.aziz & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2017
$~R-548 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC APPEAL7662012 Decided on:23. d November, 2017 RAJENDER SINGH AZIZ & ORS. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.K. Bachchan, Advocate versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shoumik Mazumdar for Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant was the claimant before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) in accident claim case (MACT suit no.320/2010) instituted by him on 23.02.2007, seeking compensation for injuries suffered in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 08.01.2002 on account of negligent driving of Tata truck bearing registration no.HR-10A-1878. The tribunal decided the said case, by judgment dated 24.03.2012, inter alia, holding the first respondent /truck driver negligent leading to the said accident. The tribunal found that the truck was registered in the name of the second respondent and insured against third party risk with the third respondent for th...
m/s.material Movement p.ltd vs.workmen Ram Avtar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 14619/2004 Reserved on:16. h November, 2017 Pronounced on:23. d November, 2017 M/S.MATERIAL MOVEMENT P.LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Harvinder Singh, Mr. Mohit Gupta and Mr. Rohit Aggarwal, Advocates versus WORKMEN RAM AVTAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashraf Yusuf Khan and Mr. Lalit Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT % 1 This writ petition has been filed by the Management of M/s. Material Movement Pvt. Ltd, challenging Award dated 8th July, 2003 passed by Labour Court - IV, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (herein after referred to as the Labour Court) whereby the Labour Court has directed reinstatement of the three respondent workmen with full back wages and continuity of service, holding that their termination violated Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). W.P.(C) 14619/2004 Page 1 of 11 2 Mr. Harvinder Singh, learned counsel appearing f...
Sh. Vishnu Lal vs.m/s Jai Durga Commodity Trading Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. 11.2017 CO.A(SB) 21/2014 and CA10252014 SH. VISHNU LAL ..... Appellant Through Mr. Chandra Shekhar Yadav, Adv. $~CP-31 * % + versus M/S JAI DURGA COMMODITY TRADING PVT. LTD. & ORS. Through ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This appeal is filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking to impugn the order dated 24.02.2014 passed by the Company Law Board.2. Pursuant to an order of this court directing service of notice through publication, the necessary publication has been made by the appellant. The respondents are accordingly served. As none is present for the respondents, respondents are proceeded ex parte.3. The grievance of the appellant is limited. The appellant is said to be one of the initial promoters and the director of respondent No.1 Company till 26.02.2008 holding 5000 fully paid up equity shares of Rs.10 each. The case of the appellant is that being dis...
M/S Ambience Hospitality Pvt Ltd vs.dy Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P162015 Order reserved on:15. H November,2017 Order pronounced on:23rd November,2017 M/S AMBIENCE HOSPITALITY PVT LTD Through: Mr. K.R. Manjani, Advocate. ...Petitioner DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX versus Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Senior Standing Counsel for respondent. CORAM: % HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 By way of the present Revision petition filed under Section 397 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as Cr.P.C.) the petitioner seeks quashing of judgment dated 24.06.2014 and order of sentence dated 25.06.2014 passed by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (hereinafter referred as ACMM), Tis Hazari Courts, whereby the learned ACMM held the petitioner guilty under Section 266C/277 of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred IT).2. The brief facts of the present case are that the complainant/Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, filed a complaint against the petitioner al...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »