Delhi Court November 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State vs.dhananjay Alias Barood Alias Pathan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P972015 Order reserved on:21. t November,2017 Order pronounced on:24th November,2017 STATE ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok Kr. Garg, APP for the State DHANANJAY @BAROOD @ PATHAN versus Respondent Through: Mr. U.A. Khan, Adv. with Mr. Sunil Sagar and Mr. Shahrukh Khan, Advs. CORAM: % HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 The present Revision petition is filed by the petitioner under Section 397 and 401 read with Section 482 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as Cr.P.C.) to set aside the order dated 24.11.2014 passed by the Additional Session Judge (hereinafter referred ASJ), Shahdara/Karkardooma Courts in FIR No.243/2014, under Section 392/ 397/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred IPC) whereby the respondent was discharged from the offences under Section 392/ 397/ 34 IPC registered at Police Station Jagatpuri.2. The brief facts of the present case are that on 24.04.2014, the comp...
Bajaj Resources Limited & Anr. Vs.goyal Herbals Private Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % BAJAJ RESOURCES LIMITED & ANR. 24th November, 2017 ..... Plaintiffs CS(COMM) No.1564/2016 Through Mr. J.Sai Deepak, Mr. Piyush Kumar and Mr. Vardaan Anand, Advs. versus GOYAL HERBALS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. ..... Defendants Through Mr. Jaspreet Singh Kapur and Mr. Rahul Kukreja, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) IA No.8739/2017 (u/O. VI R.17 CPC filed by plaintiff) and IA No.9810/2017 (u/O.VII R.10 CPC filed by defendants) 1.(i) This is a suit filed by two plaintiffs. Plaintiff no.1 is Bajaj Resources Limited. Plaintiff no.2 is Bajaj Corporation Limited. The subject suit is a suit for infringement of the trademark, passing off, dilution, unfair competition and damages etc. Plaintiff no.1 is the CS(COMM) No.1564/2016 Page 1 of 12 owner of the subject trademark. Plaintiff no.2 is a licensee for user of the trademark. (ii) There are five defendants in the suit. Defe...
Akhand Rashtrawadi Party vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2017
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 10425/2017 % Date of Decision:24. h November, 2017 AKHAND RASHTRAWADI PARTY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.N. Singh with Mr. Puneesh Grover, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC with Mr. Sanjay Pal and Ms. Shruti, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Abhishek Malhotra with Ms. Deepa Trigunayat, Advs. for R-2. Mr. Rishi Agrawala with Ms. Niyati Kohli and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advs. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM No.42610/2017 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. W.P. (C) No.10425/2017 & CM No.42609/2017 1. This writ petition makes the following prayer: Issue Writ in nature of Mandamus or Direction or order to... RESPONDENTS especially Respondent No.5 to W.P. (C) No.10425/2017 Page 1 of 3 constitute a committee consists of members belongs to Respondent No.5 itself, social activist/petit...
Danieli Corus Bv vs.steel Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~21 * + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 189/2017 Date of decision:24. h November, 2017 DANIELI CORUS BV ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Suhail Dutt, Sr. Adv. with Mr.A.Singh, Ms.Moonmoon Nanda, Ms.Anushree Sahai, Mr.Kushagra Sah, Mr.Azhar, Advs. versus STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Wasim Ashraf, Adv CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by the petitioner Danieli Corus BV inter-alia praying for the following reliefs: i) Grant ad-interim orders and/or directions under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 restraining the Respondent, its servants, agents and employees from any further disclosure or misuse or dissemination of OMP(I)(COMM) 189/2017 Page 1 Proprietary and Confidential Information of the... Petitioner to any third party in any manner wh...
M/S Amit Sales Corporation Pvt Ltd vs.m/s Amg Infrastructure Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2017
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 283/2016 M/S AMIT SALES CORPORATION PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. T.K. Tiwari, Advocate versus M/S AMG INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD ..... Defendant Through None Date of Decision:23. d November, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for recovery of Rs. 1,11,04,928/- along with pendente lite and future interest @ 24% per annum.2. It is the case of the plaintiff that the plaintiff-company deals in business of supply of steel pipes and tubes of various types and had been supplying goods/materials to the defendant-company for its various projects as per its demand from time to time since 23rd April, 2012 against purchase orders.3. It is further stated in the plaint that the plaintiff-company had been maintaining a running account for the goods supplied and the payments received from the defendant-company and as per the said running account, a sum of Rs. 89,84,570/- is out...
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.rahul Gupta @ Manoj Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2017
$~R-555 & 556 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d November, 2017 + MAC.APP.794/2012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate. versus RAHUL GUPTA @ MANOJ KUMAR & ORS .Respondents Through: Mr. O. P. Mannie, Advocate for R-1. + MAC.APP.542/2013 RAHUL GUPTA @ MANOJ KUMAR & ORS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. O. P. Mannie, Advocate. versus ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate. .Respondents JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The claimant (appellant in MAC.appeal No.542/2013) had suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 29.10.2005 involving negligent driving of a half body truck bearing registration No.HR-38/D-6016, admittedly insured against third party MAC App. No.794/2012 & 542/2013 Page 1 of 3 risk for the period in question with the Oriental Insurance Company Limited (the insurer). On his accident claim case (MACT No.309/10/06) instituted on 03.01.2006, the Tribuna...
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.ramesh Budhwar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2017
$~R-561 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d November, 2017 + MAC APPEAL8112012 and CM128122012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate versus RAMESH BUDHWAR & ORS. ...... RESPONDENTS Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The accident claim case (suit no.748/2010) instituted on 25.07.2006 by the first to third respondents (collectively, the claimants) was contested by the appellant (insurer) on the grounds that there was no contract of insurance valid or subsisting in respect of the offending vehicle described as Ambassador car (taxi) bearing registration no.DL-1YA-2843 for the date of cause of action (26.04.2006), the said vehicle admittedly owned by the company represented by fifth and sixth respondents and driven by the fourth respondents statedly in a negligent manner causing death of Kusum Lata. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) rejected the said plea and concluded that it...
Bimla Devi vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2017
$~1 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BIMLA DEVI Date of Decision: November 23, 2017 CRL.A. 338/2011 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate with appellant in person. versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State/R-1 with ASI Bhagmal Singh, PS DBG Road. Mr.N.K.Bansal, Advocate for R-2. PRATIBHA RANI, J.(Oral) CRL.A. 338/2011 1. The appellant is aggrieved by the order on sentence dated 10th January, 2011 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge in Crl.A.No.37/2008, pertaining to FIR No.53/90, under Sections 498A/4IPC, PS D.B.G. Road, Delhi whereby while partly allowing the appeal, the conviction of the respondent No.2/husband for committing offence punishable under Section 498A IPC was maintained while his conviction for committing offence punishable under Section 406 IPC was set-aside and he was ordered to be released on probation.2. The order on sentence reads as under: 29. Broadly speaking I find that there was s...
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.animesh Malik & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2017
$~R-552 & 553 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d November, 2017 + MAC.APP.791/2012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate. versus ANIMESH MALIK & ORS + MAC.APP.590/2013 ANIMESH MALIK ..Respondents Through: Mr. O. P. Mannie, Advocate for R-1. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. O. P. Mannie, Advocate. versus ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate. .Respondents JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The claimant (appellant in MAC.appeal No.590/2013) had suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 29.10.2005 involving negligent driving of half body truck bearing registration No.HR-38/D-6016, admittedly insured against third party MAC App. No.791/2012 & 590/2013 Page 1 of 3 risk for the period in question with the Oriental Insurance Company Limited (the insurer). On his accident claim case (MACT No.310/10/06) instituted on 03.01.2006, the Tribunal held inquiry, and by judgment...
The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs.sunita & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2017
$~R-554 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d November, 2017 + MAC APPEAL7922012 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. Shoumik Mazumdar, ..... Appellant versus Advocate SUNITA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. In a motor vehicular accident that took place on 06.12.2008 involving negligent driving of a truck bearing registration no.UP-78- AT-3543, admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant (insurer), Vijay Kumar died. His wife and five other members of the family dependent on him, they being first to sixth respondents in appeal (collectively, the claimants), instituted accident claim case (MACT No.202/10/10) on 28.05.2009 seeking compensation. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) awarded Rs.10,35,904/- as compensation with interest at the rate of 7.5% p.a. calculating it by including Rs.8,45,904/- towards loss of dependency, Rs.10,000/- for funeral charges, Rs.60...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »