Delhi Court November 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gareeba vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 339/2014 ANIL @ RAJESH Reserved on:28. h October, 2017 Decided on:25. h November, 2017 ..... Appellant STATE Represented by: Mr. Ajay Verma, Mr. Upendra Yogesh, Advs. versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with Insp. Ajay Kumar, Kalyanpuri. + CRL.A. 301/2014 GAREEBA STATE ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA Insp. Ajay Kumar, Kalyanpuri.1. FIR No.262/2010 was registered at PS Kalyan Puri vide Ex.PW-1/A on 30th July, 2010 at 4:30 AM on the statement of one Ravi Bhushan Mishra (PW-2) who stated that he was driving Tata Sumo UP17-T-0356 of Ganga Tourism and used to pick and drop passengers from call centres. On the night of 29-30th July, 2010 at around 11:40 PM while he was going to Sector-58, Noida from Kondli, he saw one person at Kondli Pul whose clothes wer...
Chander Mohan Dhingra vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2017
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :25. h NOVEMBER, 2017 CRL.A. 894/2015 CHANDER MOHAN DHINGRA ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Azhar Qayum, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR S.P.GARG, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. Perpetrator of the crime in this appeal is none else but the victims own son Chander Mohan Dhingra. By a judgment dated 15.07.2013 in Sessions Case No.30/2012 arising out of FIR No.47/2012 PS Krishna Nagar, the appellant was held guilty for committing offence punishable under Sections 302/307/309 IPC. By an order dated 17.07.2013, he was awarded various prison terms with fine. The sentences were to operate concurrently.2. Allegations as reflected in the charge-sheet against the appellant were that on the night intervening 06/07.02.2012 at around 12.00 at the ground floor of House No.F5/30, Krishna Nagar, he committed CRL.A. 894/2015 Pa...
Jagan Nath vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. h October, 2017 Decided on:25. h November, 2017 CRL.A. 448/2012 JAGAN NATH STATE Represented by: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey ..... Appellant with Ms. Namita Wali, Advocates. versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for the CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA State.1. In the present appeal the appellant Jagan Nath challenges his conviction for offence punishable under Section 302 IPC vide the judgment dated 28th May, 2011 and the order on sentence dated 1st June, 2011 directing him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of 5,000 in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for three months.2. Investigation commenced on receipt of DD No.9A at 4:22 PM on 27th May, 2010 at P.S. Sonia Vihar exhibited vide Ex.PW-15/A informing that in Gali No.11, Sonia Vihar H. No.B-814 a man has burnt his daughter, who has been injured and the fire has been doused. ASI Jafruddin (...
Anil @ Rajesh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 339/2014 ANIL @ RAJESH Reserved on:28. h October, 2017 Decided on:25. h November, 2017 ..... Appellant STATE Represented by: Mr. Ajay Verma, Mr. Upendra Yogesh, Advs. versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with Insp. Ajay Kumar, Kalyanpuri. + CRL.A. 301/2014 GAREEBA STATE ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA Insp. Ajay Kumar, Kalyanpuri.1. FIR No.262/2010 was registered at PS Kalyan Puri vide Ex.PW-1/A on 30th July, 2010 at 4:30 AM on the statement of one Ravi Bhushan Mishra (PW-2) who stated that he was driving Tata Sumo UP17-T-0356 of Ganga Tourism and used to pick and drop passengers from call centres. On the night of 29-30th July, 2010 at around 11:40 PM while he was going to Sector-58, Noida from Kondli, he saw one person at Kondli Pul whose clothes wer...
Birju Kumar Paswan vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.APPl. No.778/2012 Reserved on: October 28, 2017 Date of Decision : November 25, 2017 BIRJU KUMAR PASWAN .....Appellant Through Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate (DHCLSC) STATE Versus Through Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with ... Respondent ACP Jagpal Singh and Inspector Rajeev PS. Inderpuri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant, Birju Kumar Paswan, challenging the judgement and order dated 29th July, 2011 passed by the Additional Session Judge, Dwarka Courts in Session Case No.whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC and the order of sentence dated 29th July, 2011 sentencing the Appellant to imprisonment for life with fine of Rs. 10,000/-.2. The case of the prosecution is that on the intervening night between 5th April, 2010 and 6th April, 2010 at about 12:05 AM, the appella...
Sammi vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:28. 10.2017 Judgment pronounced on:25. 11.2017 + CRL.A. No.607/2013 SAMMI Through: Mr.K. Singhal, Adv. .... Appellant STATE Versus ......Respondent Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for + CRL.A. No.1093/2013 ASHRAF Through: State with Inspector Rajender Singh, PS Chandni Mahal. Mr.Azhar Qayum, Adv. .... Appellant STATE Versus ......Respondent Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for + CRL.A. No.650/2015 ASLAM Through: State with Inspector Rajender Singh, PS Chandni Mahal. Mr.M.L. Yadav, Adv. .... Appellant STATE Versus ......Respondent Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with Inspector Rajender Singh, PS Chandni Mahal. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. GARG HONBLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % (JUDGMENT) CRL.M.A. 607/2013, 1093/2013 & 650/2015 Page 1 of 36 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. On 16th October 2010, at 11:24 PM, a young lady Arti, 35 years of age, was brought, in a severely burnt condition, by her husband Javed, to the JPN hospit...
Aslam vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:28. 10.2017 Judgment pronounced on:25. 11.2017 + CRL.A. No.607/2013 SAMMI Through: Mr.K. Singhal, Adv. .... Appellant STATE Versus ......Respondent Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for + CRL.A. No.1093/2013 ASHRAF Through: State with Inspector Rajender Singh, PS Chandni Mahal. Mr.Azhar Qayum, Adv. .... Appellant STATE Versus ......Respondent Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for + CRL.A. No.650/2015 ASLAM Through: State with Inspector Rajender Singh, PS Chandni Mahal. Mr.M.L. Yadav, Adv. .... Appellant STATE Versus ......Respondent Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with Inspector Rajender Singh, PS Chandni Mahal. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. GARG HONBLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % (JUDGMENT) CRL.M.A. 607/2013, 1093/2013 & 650/2015 Page 1 of 36 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. On 16th October 2010, at 11:24 PM, a young lady Arti, 35 years of age, was brought, in a severely burnt condition, by her husband Javed, to the JPN hospit...
Ashraf vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:28. 10.2017 Judgment pronounced on:25. 11.2017 + CRL.A. No.607/2013 SAMMI Through: Mr.K. Singhal, Adv. .... Appellant STATE Versus ......Respondent Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for + CRL.A. No.1093/2013 ASHRAF Through: State with Inspector Rajender Singh, PS Chandni Mahal. Mr.Azhar Qayum, Adv. .... Appellant STATE Versus ......Respondent Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for + CRL.A. No.650/2015 ASLAM Through: State with Inspector Rajender Singh, PS Chandni Mahal. Mr.M.L. Yadav, Adv. .... Appellant STATE Versus ......Respondent Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with Inspector Rajender Singh, PS Chandni Mahal. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. GARG HONBLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % (JUDGMENT) CRL.M.A. 607/2013, 1093/2013 & 650/2015 Page 1 of 36 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. On 16th October 2010, at 11:24 PM, a young lady Arti, 35 years of age, was brought, in a severely burnt condition, by her husband Javed, to the JPN hospit...
Kalimullah vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : DECIDED ON : OCTOBER28 2017 NOVEMBER25 2017 + CRL.A. 1502/2013 KALIMULLAH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Chetan Lokur with Mr.Nitish Chaudhary, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR S.P GARG, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is a judgment dated 09.05.2013 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.56/2011 arising out of FIR No.registered at Police Station Bharat Nagar by which the appellant-Kalimullah was held guilty for committing offences punishable under SectionsIPC and Section 23 read with Section 26 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000. By an order dated 30.05.2013, the appellant was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for life with fine `1,00,000/- under Section 302 IPC; Rigorous Imprisonment for three years with fine Crl.A.1502/2013 Page 1 of 16 `2,000/- under Section 201 IPC ...
Vikram Kumar vs.rakesh Saraf
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % VIKRAM KUMAR RFA No.979/2017 24th November, 2017 Mr. T.P.S. Kang, Adv. ..... Appellant Through: versus RAKESH SARAF CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.42588/2017 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.979/2017 and C.M. No.42589/2017 (stay) 2. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 24.8.2017 by which the trial court has decreed the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for a sum of Rs. 7,16,000/- along with interest at 12% per annum. Suit was filed for recovery of Rs. 19,77,000/- with interest. RFA No.979/2017 Page 1 of 7 3. At the outset it may be noted that appellant/defendant did file the written statement, did not cross examine the witnesses of the respondent/pla...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »