Delhi Court November 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Avtar Singh and Ors. Vs.the Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2017
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:27. 11.2017 + W.P.(C) 10384/2017 RAM AVTAR SINGH AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr Sanjeev Narula and Mr Anshuman Upadhyay, Advocates. versus THE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS......... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr Ramesh Singh, Mr Sandeepan Pathak and Mr Prem Mishra, Advocates for GNCTD. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) CM No.42407 /2017(exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 10384/2017& CM No.42406 /2017(stay) 1. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that after the acceptance of the bids for the Kiosks in the Anand Vihar ISBT, the reorganization of routes, which led to diversion of 22 U.P. route buses to Kaushambi, has resulted in a subsequent development, which substantially alters the conditions. Its WP(C) 10384/2017 Page 1 of 2 complaint is that, in these circumstances, the forfei...
Indu Singh and Anr. Vs.prem Chaudhary and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 1098/2005 + % INDU SINGH AND ANR. 27th November, 2017 ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Y.P Narula, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhay Narula and Ms. Tara Narula, Advocates. versus PREM CHAUDHARY AND ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Pranav Vashishtha, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CS(OS) 1098/2005 and I.A. No.6541/2017 (under Section 151 CPC, filed by plaintiffs 1, 2 and D-1) 1. This suit was disposed of by passing a preliminary decree on 7.7.2008. The order dated 7.7.2008 contains detailed terms. The preliminary decree is with respect to both immovable and movable properties.2. Though, the order dated 7.7.2008 refers to the decree passed as a preliminary decree, however, so far as the suit being CS(OS) No.1098/2005 Page 1 of 11 decreed for the immovable property bearing No.6/1, Roop Nagar, Delhi is concerned, the decree will not be a preliminary decree bu...
Regen Powertech Private Limited vs.green Infra Wind Farm Assets Limite ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P.(I) 22/2017 O.M.P.(I) 23/2017 Date of decision:27. h November, 2017 REGEN POWERTECH PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Jayant Mehta, Mr.Anshul Raajan and Mr.S.Aravindan, Advs. versus GREEN INFRA WIND FARM ASSETS LIMITED & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Abhinav Vasisht, Sr. Adv. Sengupta, and with Mr.Shankh Ms.Tine Abraham Ms.Prerna Jain, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) Cav. 1014/2017 in OMP(I) 22/2017 Cav. 1016/2017 in OMP(I) 23/2017 As respondents appear on receipt of advance notice, Caveats stand discharged. IA No.13988/2017 (Exemption) in OMP (I) 22/2017 IA No.13989/2017 (Exemption) in OMP (I) 23/2017 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. OMP(I) 22/2017 & OMP(I) 23/2017 Page 1 OMP(I) 22/2017 & OMP(I) 23/2017 1. These petitions raise common issues, hence are disposed of together. I may only take the facts of OMP(I) 22/2017.2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and ...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.mohd. Aslam Ali & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2017
$~R-567 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h November, 2017 + MAC.APP. 878/2012 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD...... Appellant Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate with Ms. Komal Dhingra, Advocate Versus MOHD. ASLAM ALI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The first respondent, then aged less than 20 years, suffered 1. injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 08.09.2005, due to negligent driving of bus bearing registration No.DL-1PA-5913, which was admittedly insured against third party risk for the period in question with appellant (insurer). On his accident claim case (Suit No.462/2010/2008) instituted on 22.04.2008, the tribunal held inquiry and, by judgment dated 15.05.2012, held that he had suffered injuries due to negligent driving on the part of bus driver, which finding has attained finality as it was not challenged by any of the contesting parties. The tribunal awarded total compensat...
Principal Cornmissioner of Income Tax (Central)-1 vs.manoj Hora
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2017
$~ * + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. 11.2017 ITA10452017 & CM No.42537/2017 PRINCIPAL CORNMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-1 versus ..... Appellant MANOJ HORA ..... Respondent ITA10462017 & CM No.42538/2017 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)- 1 versus ..... Appellant MANOJ HORA ..... Respondent ITA10472017 & CM No.42539/2017 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-1 versus ..... Appellant MANOJ HORA ..... Respondent ITA10482017 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-1 versus ..... Appellant MANOJ HORA ..... Respondent ITA No.1045/2017 & conn. matters Page 1 Present: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Sr. Standing Counsel for appellant. Dr. Shashwat Bajpai with Mr. Sharad Agarwal, Advs. for respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. In these appeals, the Revenues grievance is with respect to the deletions ordered b...
Suman Lata & Ors. Vs.the New India Assurance Company Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2017
SUMAN LATA & ORS. Through: None + MAC APPEAL10012012 SUMAN LATA & ORS. Through: None versus ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellants $~R-575 & 602 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h November, 2017 + MAC APPEAL9182012 and CM145852012 and 3551/2014 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus . ..Appellant THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS. Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate for ........ RESPONDENTS R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vinod Kumar, then aged 49 years, employed in a private service, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 16.09.2011, due to negligent driving of truck bearing registration no.HR-74-7756 admittedly insured against third party risk MAC Appeal No.918/2012 & 1001/2012 Page 1 of 4 with New India Assurance Company Ltd. (insurer) for the period in question and died in the consequence. His wife and three other members of the family dependent on him (c...
Lile Ram vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2017
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:27. h November, 2017 + W.P. (C.) No.4687/2017 LILE RAM Through Mr. Lalit Kumar Rawal and Mr. Sunil ........ Petitioner versus K. Goel, Advocates GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for L&B/LAC. Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel with Mr. Hem Kumar, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Counter affidavits have been filed by the LAC and DDA.2. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra no.241/2(02-10) 56 (06-00) having 1/4th share, situated in the revenue estate of village Ghonda ...
Ramakrishna Dutta vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2017
$~47. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10504/2017 and CM APPL. 42997-98/2017 RAMAKRISHNA DUTTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dinesh S. Badiar, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Mr. Aditya Goyal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % ORDER2711.2017 1. The only relief that the petitioner has prayed for in the present petition is for issuing directions to the Central Administrative Tribunal to finally hear and dispose of three O.As., i.e. O.A. No.252/2016, 532/2016 and 2739/2016.2. We may note that vide order dated 15.11.2017, the Tribunal has adjourned all the three matters for hearing on 23.01.2018. A perusal of the order-sheets before the Tribunal, filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner reveals that it is not as if counsel for the respondents has been seeking an adjournment. It appears from the said order sheets that due to the heavy board of the Tr...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.ramesh Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2017
$~R-568 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h November, 2017 + MAC.APP. 880/2012 and CM APPL.13984/2012 (stay) UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD...... Appellant Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate Versus RAMESH KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. O.P.Mannie, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The first respondent (claimant), then aged 46 years, employed 1. in Delhi Police as Head Constable, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 06.07.2006, due to negligent driving of Maruti car bearing registration no.HR-26L-2188, which was admittedly insured against third party risk for the period in question with appellant (insurer). On his accident claim case (MACT Case No.375/2010) instituted on 15.09.2006, the tribunal held inquiry and, by judgment dated 06.03.2012, awarded total compensation in the sum of Rs.11,99,056/-, calculating it thus:-"MAC App. No.880/2012 Page 1 of 4 Sl. No.Heads 1. Medical expenses 2...
Mr Uday Bahadur vs.mr Krishan Kumar & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:5. h September, 2017 Decided on:27. h November, 2017 CS(COMM) 1319/2016 MR UDAY BAHADUR ..... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr. N.B. Joshi and Mr. P.R. Rajhans, Advocates. versus MR KRISHAN KUMAR & ANR ..... Defendants Represented by: Mr. Deepak Biswas, Advocate for Defendant No.1. Defendant No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA I.A. No.71/2017 (under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Defendant No.1) and 2443/2017 (under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC by Defendant No.2) in CS(COMM) 1319/2016 1. Uday Bahadur, the plaintiff herein has filed the present suit inter alia seeking a decree of declaration that the Memorandum of Understanding (in short MOU) dated 15th July, 2015 and Memorandum of Amendment dated 10th January, 2016 executed between the plaintiff and defendant No.1, that is, Krishan Kumar stands annulled/terminated/cancelled/rescinded due to failure, defaults, inaction and non-performance on the p...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »