Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Promila @ Neena & Ors. Vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. A. No.751/2000 Reserved on:30. h August, 2017 Date of Decision:30. h October, 2017 PROMILA @ NEENA & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Anupam S. Sharma, Adv. With Ms. Prachee Satija & Mr. Prakasrsh Airan, Advs. Versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.The appellant has filed the present appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (Cr.P.C.) against the impugned judgment, dated 20.11.2000, and the order of sentence, dated 24.11.2000, respectively passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi in case FIR No.270/1998, P.S.-Prasad Nagar, whereby the appellants have been convicted under Section 3of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for life each and fine of Rs.500/- each and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo Rigorous I...
M/S Amar Iron Store and Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: October 30, 2017 % + W.P.(C) 9606/2015 M/S AMAR IRON STORE AND ORS Through: Mr. Rishi Bhatnagar, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Archana Gaur, Adv. with Ms. Ridhima Gaur, Adv. for R-1/UOI Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, Adv. for DDA Mr. Siddharth Panda, Adv. for R-2 and R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners, who are ten in number seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act which came into effect on January 1, 2014 (2013 Act). A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred as the 1894 Act) in respect of which Award No.15/1992-93 dated 19th June, 1992 was made, inter alia, in respect of the petitioners land comprised W.P...
Manmohan Malhotra vs.krishan Lal & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
$~88 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV. 488/2017 & CM No.38909/2017 (for stay) MANMOHAN MALHOTRA Through: Mr. Sunil Singh Gurjar, Adv. ........ Petitioner Versus KRISHAN LAL & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS ORDER3010.2017 This Rent Control Revision Petition under Section 25B(8) of the % 1. Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 impugns the order [dated 7th July, 2017 in ARC No.25969/2016 of the Court of Additional Rent Controller (ARC) (West), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi]. of dismissal of the application filed by the petitioner for leave to defend the petition for eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act filed by the respondents and the consequent order of eviction of the petitioner from one shop measuring 13 ft. X9ft. on the ground floor of property No.A-46, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi.2. 3. The counsel for the petitioner has been heard. The counsel for the petitioner has raised three contentions. Firstly, that the petitioner ...
National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.vijay Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
$~R-373 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.666/2011 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. versus VIJAY KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.K. Bachchan, Adv. for R CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The first respondent had instituted accident claim case (MACP1682009) on 31.03.2009 which was decided by the tribunal, by judgment dated 02.04.2011, returning a finding that he (the claimant) had suffered permanent disability on account of injuries suffered in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 04.02.2009 due to negligent driving of bus bearing registration No.DL1B1065(the bus), his functional disability having been evaluated as 40%, this leading to the award in the sum of Rs. 6,89,045/- being granted, the liability being fastened against the insurance company.2. The appeal is pressed by the insurer to question the assessment of functional disability. Ha...
State Govt of Nct of Delhi vs.kapil
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
$~12 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 381/2017 STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner for the Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, Additional Public Prosecutor State with Inspector Daya Sagar, SHO Sonia Vihar, Delhi, Inspector Mithlesh CAW Cell, North East, Sub-Inspector Subhash, Police Station Sonia Vihar and Sub-Inspector Manu Dev, Police Station Amar Colony, Delhi. Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate with respondent in person. ..... Respondent KAPIL versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI ORDER3010.2017 P.S. TEJI, J.read with Section 482 of Cr. P.C. Crl. M.A. No.10825/2017 (Condonation of delay of 37 days in filing the leave petition) 1. The State has filed the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for seeking condonation of delay of 37 days in preferring the accompanying leave petition to challenge the impugned judgment dated 23.02.2017 passed by learned Additional Session Judge (North-East)-01, Karkardooma Courts, ...
Kewal Krishan Gujral vs.sonmati Devi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO No.416/2017 + % KEWAL KRISHAN GUJRAL30h October, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Shiv Prakash Pandey and Mr. Raghav Pandey, Advocates. SONMATI DEVI versus ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM Nos. 38810-11/2017 (Exemptions) Exemptions allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. CM Nos. 38812/2017 (delay in filing) 38813/2017 (delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the applications, delays in filing and re-filing are condoned. CMs stand disposed of. FAO No.416/2017 & CM No.38809/2017 (stay) 1. This First Appeal under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is filed FAO No.416/2017 Page 1 of 6 by the respondent in the proceedings before the Employees Compensation Commissioner impugning the judgment dated 8.2.2017 by which the Employees Compensation Commissioner has allowed the claim...
Jain Riceland Pvt Ltd vs.sagar Overseas
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h October, 2017 Decided on:30. h October, 2017 CS(COMM) 796/2016 JAIN RICELAND PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr. Mohan Vidhani and Mr. Ashish Singh, Advocates. versus SAGAR OVERSEAS ..... Defendant Represented by: Mr. Hitender Kapur and Mr. Sagar Chawla, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA I.A. Nos. 7978/2016 (under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC) and 573/2017 (under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC) in CS (COMM) 796/2016 1. Plaintiff in the present suit inter alia seeks permanent injunction against the defendant, its servants, agents, distributors etc. from manufacturing, using, marketing, selling, soliciting, displaying, advertising or in any other mode or manner dealing with in or using/representing, displaying the impugned trademark/word SWAD which was deceptively similar to the plaintiffs trademark in respect of rice of all kinds and from infringement of its trademark SWADI and SWADISHT registered under Nos....
Abhinav Sinhmar (Minor) vs.the Chairman, Joint Admission Committee and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
$~16 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of judgment :30. 10.2017 + W.P.(C) 6076/2017 & C.M. No.25244/2017 ABHINAV SINHMAR (MINOR) ........ Petitioner Through Mr.J.S.Mann, Advocate. versus THE CHAIRMAN, JOINT ADMISSION COMMITTEE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat and Ms.Palak Rohmetra, Advocte for R-1/DTU. Ms.Isha Khanna, Advocate for R-4. Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for R-2, R-3 and R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(oral) 1 By this petition, the petitioner is seeking a prayer of issuance of an admission slip confirming his admission in the B.Tech (Computer Engineering) Course in the Netaji Subhash Institute of Technology, Delhi; he claims priority in GN CW Category in Priority IV of the defence category. 2 The averments in the petition disclose that the father of the petitioner WP(C) No.6076/2017 Page 1 of 13 had been discharged from Indian Army after having served there for 5 years 11 months and 11 days; he was discharged on ...
Smt Asha Rani Gupta vs.state Through Its Chief Secrtary& Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
$~ * + . % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST.CAS. 80/2015 SMT ASHA RANI GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Vishal Garg, Advocate. versus STATE THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRTARY& ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None Date of Decision:30. h October, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act for grant of probate in respect of Will dated 28th July, 2014 of the deceased Mr. Rabindranath Gupta.2. It has been averred in the petition that the petitioner is the wife of the deceased Mr. Rabindranath, who expired on 4th December, 2014. The deceased is stated to have executed a Will dated 28th July, 2014, which was duly attested by Mrs. Parveen Mittal, Mr. Vinod Gupta and Mr. Sunil Gupta. The Will dated 28th July, 2014 is reproduced hereinunder:-"TEST.CAS. 80/2015 Page 1 of 7 WILL THIS IS THE LAST WILL TESTAMENT of me Rabindranath Gup...
Virender Singh and Ors. Vs.the Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h October, 2017 % + W.P.(C) 7140/2015 VIRENDER SINGH AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Pradeep Sehrawat, Adv. versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Ms. Santwana, Advs. for UOI. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms. Koumudi Kiran Pathak and Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advs. for LAC & GNCTD. Mr. Arun Birbal, Mr. Rohan Mehra and Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advs. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. While relying on the decision rendered by the Apex Court in the case of Pune Municipal Corporation & Anr. v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki & Ors. reported in (2014) 3 SCC183 petitioners have approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of mandamus declaring the entire acquisition proceedings with respect to 4 Bighas 16 Biswas of Land comprised in Khasra No.997, 4 Bigha 16 Biswas of the Lan...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »