Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gore Lal & Anr. Vs.united India Insurance Co Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2017
$~ R-385 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:31. t October, 2017 + MAC.APP. 776/2011 GORE LAL & ANR. Through: None. ..... Appellants versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Adv. for Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants were impleaded in an Accident Claim Case (Case No.1108/2008) instituted for and on behalf of second to sixth respondents (collectively, the claimants). In the wake of Accident Information Report (AIR), as party respondents on the averments that they are the owner and driver respectively of the motor vehicle described as Tempo bearing registration No.DL-1LD-7498 which was involved in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 18.12.2007 resulting in death of Brij Kishore Gupta. The said vehicle MAC.APP. 776/2011 Page 1 of 3 was admittedly insured against third party risk for the period in question with the first respondent (the insurer)...
Astuti Through Father Dipak Kumar vs.govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
$~9&10 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + ASTUTI THROUGH FATHER DIPAK KUMAR........ Petitioner W.P.(C)No.1023/2017 & CM No.4473/2016 Through : Mr. Khagesh Jha and Date of decision :30. h October, 2017 versus Ms. Slomita Rai, Advs. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel for GNCTD with Mr. Sandeepan Pathak, Adv. + W.P.(C) 3606/2017 & CM No.20652/2017 JUSTICE FOR ALL Through : Mr. Khagesh B. Jha and ........ Petitioner versus Ms. Slomita Rai, Advs. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel for GNCTD with Mr. Sandeepan Pathak, Adv. Mr. Kamal Gupta and Ms. Tripti Gupta, Advs. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) W.P.(C) Nos.1023/2016 & 3606/2017 Page 1 of 5 GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 Both these writ petitions lay a challenge to the notification dated 18th December, 2015 whereby the Directorate of Education of the Govt. Of NCT of...
Ramesh Kumar vs.the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 976/2017 RAMESH KUMAR Through: Mr. R.K. Lamba, Advocate. ..Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for State. ..Respondent BAIL APPLN. 1336/2017 VIKRANT BIRLA@KATTU ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Nayyar, Senior advocate, with Ms. Megha Sharma, Advocate. Versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Ms. Anita Abraham, APP for State. ..Respondent BAIL APPLN. 1496/2017 SANDEEP Through: Mr. Anirudh Yadav, Advocate ..Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for State. Through: Through: % ORDER3010.2017 1. By this common order, I shall dispose of the petitions filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.P.C.'), whereby the petitioners seek grant of BAIL APPLN. 976/2017 & CONNECTED MATTERS Page 1 of 6 Regular Bail in FIR No.469/2014 under Section 147/148/149/302/307 of the Ind...
Vikrant Birla Alias Kattu vs.the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 976/2017 RAMESH KUMAR Through: Mr. R.K. Lamba, Advocate. ..Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for State. ..Respondent BAIL APPLN. 1336/2017 VIKRANT BIRLA@KATTU ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Nayyar, Senior advocate, with Ms. Megha Sharma, Advocate. Versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Ms. Anita Abraham, APP for State. ..Respondent BAIL APPLN. 1496/2017 SANDEEP Through: Mr. Anirudh Yadav, Advocate ..Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for State. Through: Through: % ORDER3010.2017 1. By this common order, I shall dispose of the petitions filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.P.C.'), whereby the petitioners seek grant of BAIL APPLN. 976/2017 & CONNECTED MATTERS Page 1 of 6 Regular Bail in FIR No.469/2014 under Section 147/148/149/302/307 of the Ind...
Ravi vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. A. No.1732/2014 Reserved on:20. h September, 2017 Date of Decision:30. h October, 2017 RAVI STATE Through: Mr. O. P. Saxena, Advocate .....Appellant Versus .....Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.The appellant has filed the present appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) against the impugned judgment, dated 08.07.2014 and the order of sentence, dated 15.07.2014, respectively passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rohini Courts, Delhi in case FIR No.181/2011 filed under Section 3Indian Penal Code (IPC), P.S.- Sultanpuri, whereby the appellant has been convicted under Section 3of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.10,000/- each and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo Crl.A.1732/2014 Pag...
M/S Hcl Learning Ltd. Vs. M/S Sadhna Talent School
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
* + % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO No.417/2017 FAO No.417/2017 M/S HCL LEARNING LTD. 30th October, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anuj Kumar and Mr. Rishabh Mehta, Advs. versus M/S SADHNA TALENT SCHOOL + FAO No.418/2017 M/S. HCL LEARNING LTD. ..... Respondent ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anuj Kumar and Mr. Rishabh Mehta, Advs. versus ST. THOMAS SCHOOL + FAO No.419/2017 M/S HCL LEARNING LTD. ..... Respondent ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anuj Kumar and Mr. Rishabh Mehta, Advs. versus M/S ORIENTAL FAIRFIELD SCHOOL ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. All these appeals arise out of a similar impugned order passed by the trial court dismissing the suits as not maintainable. For the FAO No.417/2017 & conn. Page 1 of 4 sake of convenience the impugned order of 10.8.2017 challenged in FAO No.417/2017 is referred below:-"Present: Sh. Rishab Mehta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. 10.08.2...
Sarabjeet Kaur & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: October 30, 2017 SARABJEET KAUR & ORS Through: Mr. Rishi Bhatnagar, Adv. ........ Petitioner % + W.P.(C) 9596/2015 versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: Ms. Archana Gaur, Adv. with ..... Respondent Ms. Ridhima Gaur, Adv. for R1/UOI Mr. Pawan Mathur, Standing Counsel for DDA Mr. Siddharth Panda, Adv. for R-2 and R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners, who are ten in number seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act which came into effect on January 1, 2014 (2013 Act). A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred as the 1894 Act) in respect of which Award No.15/1992-93 dated 19th June, 1992 was made, inter alia, in respect of the petitioners land comprised W.P....
M/S Rohini Strips Limited & Ors vs.industrial Development Bank of Indi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + W.P.(C) 5615/2016 & CM No.23330/2016 M/S ROHINI STRIPS LIMITED & ORS Decided on:30. 10.2017 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajiv Khosla, Advocate along with Mr. A.K. Roy, Advocate. Versus INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, Advocate along with Ms. Srishta Kapoor, Advocate. Mr. Ved Chadha, AGM, IDBI Bank for respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA1 The petitioners have assailed an order dated 28.10.2015 passed by the learned Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) in Misc. Appeal No.310/2014 filed by them against an order dated 06.06.2014 of the DRT-II, Delhi, dismissing their application (MA No.179/2013) under Order 9 Rule 13 of CPC for setting aside of an ex-parte judgment and decree dated 18.10.2007 passed by the DRT-II in O.A. No.293/2001.2. At the outset, we may note that initially the petitioners s...
M/S Orient Ceramics and Industries Ltd vs. Square Ceramic Private Ltd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23. d October, 2017 Pronounced on:30. h October, 2017 CS(OS) No.110/2011 M/S ORIENT CERAMICS AND INDUSTRIES LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Anshuj Dhingra, Mr.Kartik the Sethi, Advs. with AR of plaintiff. Versus SQUARE CERAMIC PRIVATE LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through None being ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The plaintiff seeks decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their directors, agents, assignees, distributors, servants or any other person claiming under or through them from in any manner dealing with, manufacturing, exporting, selling, offering for sale, exhibiting, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing with tiles or cognate/allied goods under the trade mark of the plaintiff company "ORIENT" or any other identical/deceptively similar mark of the plaintiffs mark "ORIENT" including deceptively similar name "ORINTO" amounting to passing off the defendant's ...
Monu Singh vs.the Land Acquisition Collector and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:26.10.2017 Judgment delivered on:30.10.2017 + W.P.(C) 1461/2014 & C.M. No.3040/2014 MONU SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Bhagwat Prashad Gupta and Mr. P. Rajan, Advs. versus THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR & ORS Through Mr. Siddharth Panda, Adv for R-1. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Ajay Verma, Sr. standing counsel with Ms. Diviani Khanna, Adv for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The petitioner is the owner of certain lands contained in khasra No.16, Village Kotla. The total land comprised in khasra No.16 was 37 bigha and 19 biswas. The dispute raised by the petitioner in the present case relates only to 16 biswas of land. His submission is that this is a private land. It belongs to the petitioner. The petitioner is in possession of the aforenoted W.P. (C) No.1461/2014 Page 1 of 6 land. 2 Notification dated 05.01.1977 had been issued qua the aforenoted village including the present kha...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »