Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Super Cassettes Industries Pvt Ltd vs.haldwani Digital Services Pvt Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2017
$~OS- * % + HALDWANI DIGITAL SERVICES PVT LTD defendant is ex parte Through ..... Defendant IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision 31.10.2017 CS(COMM) 476/2016 & IA No.13781/2014 SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Pravin Anand, Ms.Prachi Agarwal and Ms.Mrinali Menon, Advs. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) This suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking a decree of permanent 1. injunction to restrain the defendant, etc. from engaging themselves or from authorising in recording, distributing, broadcasting, public performance/communication to the public or in any other way exploiting the cinematograph films, sound recordings, etc. that is owned by the plaintiff including all works whereon the plaintiff has shown its copyright under Section 52A of the Copyright Act. Other connected reliefs including the relief for rendition of account, etc. have also been sought.2. Since defendant did not enter appearance despite s...
Sunil Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. A. 193 of 2017 SUNIL KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Ms Shivani Luthra and Mr Altamish Ilyal Siddiqui, Advocates STATE versus .....Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I. S. MEHTA ORDER3110.2017 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is an appeal filed by the accused, Sunil Kumar, against the judgment dated 28th September 2016 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-3 (ASJ), South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi, convicting the Appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and the order of sentence dated 17th October 2016 whereby the Appellant was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 50,000/- and in default of payment fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for six months. Case of the prosecution 2. The story of the prosecution is that the Appellant was a constable with the Delhi Polic...
Adma Solutions Private Limited vs.shobha Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : October 31, 2017 RFA5832007 ADMA SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant Through Mr.Paritosh Budhiraja, Mr.Ashwani Ahuja, and Ms.Surabhi Maheshwari, Advs. versus SHOBHA JAIN ..... Respondent Through Mr.J.K.Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.JUDGMENT The present appeal has been filed by the appellant 1. against the modified decree dated 12.01.2007 and judgment and decree dated 03.03.2006 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi whereby the suit filed by the plaintiff/respondent has been decreed in favour of the plaintiff/respondent and against the defendant/appellant. The facts enumerating from the plaint filed before the 2. for Court below are that possession and recovery of Rs.2,80,000/- against the defendant alleging in the plaint that she was the owner of the first floor and the plaintiff/respondent RFA583/2007 filed a suit Page 1of 13 the defendant/appellant second floor of ...
Devender Kumar Verma vs.tara Devi Thru l.r. Ram Kishor
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : October 31, 2017 RFA432007 DEVENDER KUMAR VERMA Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Ms. Nandini Nagpal, Advocates ..... Appellant versus TARA DEVI THRU L.R. RAM KISHOR Through: Mr. S.N. Gupta, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S.TEJI, J1 Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 04.11.2006 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi in Suit No.268/2003, the appellant has preferred the instant appeal under Section 96 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC).2. In a nutshell, the facts of the case are that plaintiff/respondent was the owner of property No.JD-18, measuring 300 sq. yds out of Khasra No.22situated at Khirki Extension, Opposite Malviya Nagar, New Delhi. She entered into a collaboration agreement dated 09.09.1999 with the defendant/appellant for construction of flats over the plot of land, thereby agreeing that the plaintiff/respondent shall be t...
The Calcutta Stock Exchange vs.blb Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2017
$~5 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % FAO(OS) 5/2017 and CM No.883/2017 Date of decision :31. t October, 2017 THE CALCUTTA STOCK EXCHANGE Through : Mr. Manish Goswami, Adv. ..... Appellant BLB LIMITED versus Through : Mr. P. Nagesh and ..... Respondent Mr. Dhruv Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The appellant before us (defendant in the suit), assails an order dated 20th October, 2016 whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed IA No.11624/2016 filed by the appellant in CS(OS) No.272/2004 under Order 16 Rule 1A seeking leave to lead the evidence of Sh. Motamarri Appanna Veerraju (Sri M.A.V. Raju), as DW-2 for reasons set out in para 3 of the application. Amongst others, the appellant has pointed out the three reports which were exhibited in the FAO(OS)No.5/2017 Page 1 of 3 evidence of the first defence witness at the instance of the respondent/plaintiff.2. The witness ...
M/S a.k. Woolen Industries & Ors vs.shri Narain Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t October, 2017. RC.REV. 495/2017 M/S A.K. WOOLEN INDUSTRIES & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ratan K. Singh, Mr. Nikhilesh Krishnan, Mr. Ashwini Kumar & Ms. Somya Priyadarshini, Advs. Versus SHRI NARAIN GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Lalit Gupta with Mr. Siddharth, Mr. Karan Singh Rajpurohit & Mr. Harsh Panwar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Caveat No.933/2017 1.2. The counsel for the caveator / respondent has appeared. The caveat stands discharged. CM No.39137/2017 (for exemption) 3.4. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. RC.REV. 495/2017 & CMs No.39135/2017 (for stay) & 39136/2017 (for condonation of 42 days delay in re-filing the petition) 5. This Rent Control Revision Petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 impugns the order [dated 17th May, 2017 in CIS No.80568/2016 (Old E. No.135/2016) of the Court of Rent Controller (RC), ...
United India Insurance Co Ltd vs.mst Salman & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t October, 2017 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate ..... Appellant $~15 * % + MAC.APP. 350/2014 versus MST SALMAN & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akarsh Garg, Mr.Rachit Aggarwal, Advocates for respondents no.1 to 8.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.9,83,000/- along with interest @ 7.5% per annum has been awarded to the claimants/respondents no.1 to 8.2. On 31st December, 2009, Zeenat was sitting on the pillion of motor cycle bearing No.DL-IST-0467 and she fell down and suffered fatal injuries. The deceased aged 38 years was working in a factory earning Rs.5,000/- per month. The Claims Tribunal treated the deceased as a housewife and took the value of her services according to the minimum wages as Rs.4,146/-, added 25% towards inflation and applied the multiplier of 15 to compute...
Jai Singh & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 12002/2015 Date of decision:31. t October, 2017 JAI SINGH & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Richa Oberoi and Mr. Prateek Kohli, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vijay Joshi, Standing Counsel with Ms. Rashi Singhal, Adv. for R1. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for L&B/LAC. Mr. Raunak Singh, Adv. for R3. MR. O.P. Saxena, Adv. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1.... Petitioners have filed the present writ petition seeking a writ declaring the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of the land of the petitioners forming part of Khasra No.369 (0-04) and 375 (0-11) admeasuring 15 Biswas situated in Village Neb Sarai, New Delhi as deemed to have been lapsed in view of the provisions of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Rese...
Evaluative Finance and Investment Private Limited (In vol.liqn,) Vs... ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. 10.2017 $~CP-50 * % + CO.PET. 58/2017 EVALUATIVE FINANCE AND INVESTMENT PRIVATE LIMITED (IN VOL.LIQN,) Through Mr. Kunal Sharma, Adv. for OL. ........ Petitioner CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition, filed under Section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (herein referred to as the Act), by the Official Liquidator (OL) for the voluntary winding up of Evaluative Finance and Investment Private Limited (herein referred to as the said company).2. The said company was incorporated on 14.11.2013 under the provisions of the Act with the Registrar of Companies (ROC) having its registered office situated at 1st Floor, East Tower, NBCC Place, Bhishma Pitamah Marg, Pragati Vihar, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003.3. The ROC was informed about the Voluntary Winding up of the said company when Board of Directors declared their solvency in the meeting, held on 23.01.2016. The said declaration was exec...
Col Anand Swaroop vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2017
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9627/2017 & C.M. No.39204/217 1. COL ANAND SWAROOP ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Pandey, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC for UOI with Maj Charul and Col. Anupam. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % The petitioner is aggrieved by the orders dated 11.07.2017 and ORDER3110.2017 09.08.2017, passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal (in short AFT), in O.A. No.593/2015 filed by him for several reliefs including quashing of the convening order dated 11.10.2012, convening a Court of Inquiry to investigate into irregularities, if any, in accounting of funds allotted to the petitioner for Indian Army, Ski Training Expedition to Norway and North Pole, sanctioned vide Govt. of Indias letter dated 30.12.2011. In his Original Application (OA), the petitioner had also prayed for quashing the directions for initiating disciplinary action against hi...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »