Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Dabur India Ltd vs.m/s Patanjali Ayurved Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2017
$~6 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % FAO(OS) 249/2017 and CM No.32660/2017 Date of decision :31. t October, 2017 M/S DABUR INDIA LTD ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Sudhir K. Makkar, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Meenakshi Singh, Ms. Saumya Gupta and Ms. Ridhi Munjal, Advs. versus M/S PATANJALI AYURVED LTD ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Simranjeet Singh, Mr. Rohan Ahuja, Ms. Sonali Dhir and Mr. Siddharth Mahajan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This appeal was filed before us complaining that by an order dated 01st September, 2017, the appellant/plaintiff had not been granted ex-parte interim injunction in IA No.10013/2017 (u/O XXXIX Rules 1 &2) in CS(OS) No.407/2017 by way of which the appellant/plaintiff had prayed for damages of mandatory and FAO(OS)No.249/2017 Page 1 of 3 permanent injunction against the respondent/defendant. The appellant had inter alia...
Ramesh Chand Jain vs.state Bank of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : October 31st, 2017 RFA1492007 RAMESH CHAND JAIN ..... Appellant Through Mr.J.K. Singh, Adv. versus STATE BANK OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr.S.L. Gupta and Mr.Mithilesh Pal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.JUDGMENT The appellant has filed the present appeal being aggrieved by 1. the judgment and decree dated 16.11.2006 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi whereby the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff stands dismissed. The facts enumerating from the plaint filed before the Court 2. below are that the State Bank of India had filed a suit against M/s R.C.Jain and Associates and others and in that suit M/s R.C.Jain and Associates filed the counter claim for the recovery of Rs.4,30,000/-. Vide order dated 30.08.1997, the said counter claim was separated RFA149/2007 Page 1of 7 from the main suit. Plaintiff/appellant deals in business of balancing/ reconciliation of account wh...
Praveen Kumar & Anr. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 7391/2016 Date of decision:31. t October, 2017 PRAVEEN KUMAR & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Esha Mazumdar, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shatrajit Banerji and Ms. Mrinalini Sengupta, Advs. for DDA. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for L&B/LAC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a relief of declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to land measuring 184 Sq. Yds. out of the land falling in Khasra No.25 total measuring 6 Bigha and 2 Biswas in the revenue estate of Village Khajuri Khas, Delhi stand lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Counsel for the petitioners submits, in thi...
Tahir Star vs.principal Commissioner of Customs Preventive
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2017
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CUSAA592017 Date of decision:31. t October, 2017. TAHIR STAR ..... Appellant Through Mr. Bhusan Lal Garg, Advocate. versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS PREVENTIVE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Senior Standing Counsel for Customs & Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Tahir Hussien, sole proprietor of M/s Tahir Star, has filed the present appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 (Act, for short) against the order dated 15th March, 2017 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) rejecting his application for condonation of delay of 248 days in filing the appeal. CUSAA592017 Page 1 of 5 2. With the consent of the learned counsel for the appellant and respondent-Revenue, we frame the following substantial question of law and have heard arguments as a very short issue arises fo...
M/S Ess Distribution (Mauritius) s.n.c.et Compagnie vs.assistant Commi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 11968/2016 M/S ESS DISTRIBUTION (MAURITIUS) S.N.C.ET COMPAGNIE Reserved on: October 10, 2017 Date of decision: October 31, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Porus Kaka, Senior Advocate with Mr. Prakash Kumar, Mr. Manish Kanth, Mrs. Rashmi Singh, Mr. Divesh Chawla, Advocates. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 1(2)(2) INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Senior standing counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate. + With W.P.(C) 11971/2016 M/S ESS ADVERTISING (MAURITIUS) S.N.C.ET COMPAGNIE (EARLIER KNOWN AS M/S ESPAN STAR SPORTS MAURITIUS S.N.C.ET COMPAGNIE) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Porus Kaka, Senior Advocate with Mr. Prakash Kumar, Mr. Manish Kanth, Mrs. Rashmi Singh, Mr. Divesh Chawla, Advocates. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 1(2)(2) INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Senior ..... Respondent WP (C) 11968/2016...
Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co Ltd vs.geeta and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2017
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:31. t October, 2017 + MAC.APP. 964/2014 & CM No.17616/2014 ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta for Suman Bagga, Advs. versus GEETA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akhtar Hussain, Adv. for R-1 & R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Anil Aswal, aged 35 years, employed in a private company M/s Taneja Vidyut Control Pvt. Ltd., working as a supervisor, with a service of about 10 years, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 09.09.2009 due to the negligent driving of Truck Dumper bearing registration No.HR-55-E-8844 and died in the consequence. The offending vehicle was admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant insurance company (insurer). On MAC App. No.964/2014 Page 1 of 6 accident claim case (suit no.80/2014) instituted on 30.09.2009 by the wife, two minor children and parents of the deceased, the tribunal h...
Shanta Kumar vs.council of Scientific and Industrial Research (Csir) & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:31. 10.2017 % + W.P.(C) 8149/2010 SHANTA KUMAR Versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH (CSIR) & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For theRespondent : Mr Rakesh Kumar. : Mr Praveen for R-1 & R-2. Mr Arun Bhardwaj with Mr Nikhil Bhardwaj forR-3. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, challenging the proceedings conducted by the Complaint Committee constituted in terms of the Office Memorandum (hereinafter the OM) dated 29.08.2006, to examine the charges of sexual harassment levelled by the petitioner against respondent no.3. The Complaint Committee had exonerated respondent no.3 of all the charges of sexual harassment levelled against him and its report was same accepted by the Disciplinary Authority. Consequently, the Disciplinary Authority passed an order dated ...
Ex. Assistant Chintada George vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 31, 2017 W.P.(C) 3584/2016 EX. ASSISTANT CHINTADA GEORGE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Bijendra Singh, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Advocate for respondent No.1-UOI Mr.Sankar N. Sinha, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1.... Petitioner, who was working as an Assistant (Clerical) with respondent-Insurance Company had sought retirement under General Insurance Employees Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2004.... Petitioners application of 20th January, 2004 was accepted by respondent on 22nd January, 2004 and this was conveyed to petitioner by respondent- Insurance Company vide Communication of 1st March, 2004 (Annexure P-5).... Petitioner, who was a confirmed employee of respondent-Company stood retired under the Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2004 on 31st March, 2004. It is so evident from the relievi...
Gajraj Singh vs.rajbir Singh Dhull & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : October 31st, 2017 RFA122009 GAJRAJ SINGH Through Mr.Bani Singh, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus RAJBIR SINGH DHULL & ORS ..... Respondent Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.JUDGMENT1 The present appeal has been filed by the appellant against the judgment and decree dated 02.08.2008 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi whereby the suit filed by the plaintiff/respondent for recovery of Rs 4,00,000/- as principal amount with interest of Rs.50,000/- @ 18 % per month, total amounting to Rs. 5,50,000/- had been decreed in favour of the plaintiff /respondent and against the defendants/appellant.2. The facts enumerating from the plaint filed before the Court below are that the plaintiff/respondent no.1 had filed a summary RFA12/2009 Page 1of 6 of defendant No.1 affairs induced firm. They suit under Order 37 CPC alleging therein that defendant no.1 was a finance company and defenda...
Estate Officer and Anr. Vs.beena Rani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~6 * % + W.P.(C) 10492/2016 & CM No.41143/2016 ESTATE OFFICER AND ANR. Date of Decision:31. t October, 2017 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal CGSC with Mr. Harvesh Kumar, Astt. Director and Mr. Umesh Kumar, ASO. versus BEENA RANI Through: Mr. Rohit Sharma, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The petitioners have challenged the judgment dated 27th February, 2016 whereby the learned District Judge has allowed the respondents appeal against the eviction order dated 13th July, 2015 passed by the Estate Officer.2. The respondent, working as a Private Secretary in the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Govt. of India, has been allotted government quarter No.8, Block No.124, Sector-1, M.B. Road, New Delhi.3. On 14th April, 2012, an inspection was carried out in respect of the aforesaid quarter when the respondent was not there. At the time of the inspection, Pushpa Rawat was present in the house. I...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »