Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 13 of about 590 results (0.023 seconds)New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.phooljeet Sharma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-369 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.601/2011 & CM No.12121/2011 (stay) NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Priyadarsi Acharya, Adv. versus PHOOLJEET SHARMA & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The insurance company seeks to assail the judgment dated 14.02.2011 of the motor accident claims tribunal in accident claim (suit No.756/2008) of the first respondent instituted on 07.12.1999 on the ground that no proof was adduced of involvement of the insured vehicle it being described as bus bearing registration No.DL1 6641 or negligence on the part of its driver (second respondent) and, therefore, the award under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 on account of death of A.S. Sharma in the motor vehicular accident that occurred on 05.10.1999 is erroneous.2. On perusal of the record, it is found that the tribunal has gone by the principal of r...
Tag this Judgment!Jaivinder Singh @ Jai Binder Singh vs.ishwar Chand Sharma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-370 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.618/2011 JAIVINDER SINGH @ JAI BINDER SINGH ..... Appellant Through: None. versus ISHWAR CHAND SHARMA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellant, then aged 31 years, earning his livelihood as a 1. granthi in Gurudwara Sheesh Ganj was riding on motorcycle bearing registration No.DL7 AU7237on 06.06.2009. He met with an accident due to negligent driving of motor vehicle described as Tempo Tata 709 bearing registration No.DL1D0466which was admittedly insured against third party risk with the third respondent (insurer) for the period in question, it being registered in the name of the second respondent and driven by first respondent. He filed accident claim case (MACT No.530/2009) on 10.07.2009 seeking compensation for the injuries suffered claiming, inter alia, that he had been rendered permanently ...
Tag this Judgment!Raees Ahmed vs.sheikh Iqbal Ahmed and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9392/2017 RAEES AHMED ........ Petitioner Through: Ms Zubeda Begum with Ms Sana Ansari and Ms Manisha Mehta, Advocates. versus SHEIKH IQBAL AHMED AND ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2710.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J CM No.38291/2017 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 9392/2017 & CM No.38290/2017 2. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 10.07.2017 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the Competent Authority, Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (hereinafter DUSIB) under Section 19 of the Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956 (hereafter the slum Act). By the impugned order, DUSIB has granted permission to respondent nos.1 to 3 (the applicants before the DUSIB) to initiate proceedings for eviction against the petitioner in respect of the property comprising of Balakhana of the first floor of property no.1901...
Tag this Judgment!Atul Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 1330/2017 Order reserved on:24. h October, 2017 Order pronounced on:27. h October, 2017 ATUL KUMAR Through: Mr. Jaspreet Singh Rai, Advocate. .....Petitioner Versus STATE ..Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Mahesh Chand, PS-Lajpat Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 By this present petition filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.P.C.'), the petitioner is seeking grant of Regular Bail in case FIR No.26/2017 registered under Sections 3of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as IPC) registered at Police Station Lajpat Nagar.2. Brief facts as mentioned in the FIR are that on 11.07.2017 at 11:00 pm the complainant received a phone call from his friend Rahul and he went to Gate No.3, Jal Vihar. While waiting for his friend one motorcycle came in which three persons were sitting including the petitioner who told the compl...
Tag this Judgment!Meenu Seth vs.binu Seth & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % MEENU SETH FAO No.411/2017 27th October, 2017 ..... Appellant Ms. Gauri Gupta, Advocate. Through: versus BINU SETH & ORS. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ........ RESPONDENTS To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM Appl. No.38285/2017 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. FAO No.411/2017 1. This first appeal is filed under Order XLIII Rule 1 CPC impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 9.6.2017 by which the trial court has dismissed the petition filed by the appellant under the Mental Health Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for appointment of the appellant as the guardian to take care of the person FAO No.411/2017 Page 1 of 15 and property of Sh. Binu Seth. Sh. Binu Seth is the husband of the appellant and is living with the respondent nos. 2 & 3 who are the mother and brother of Sh. Binu Seth. Sh. Binu Seth has been arrayed ...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India & Ors vs.kamal Kumar l.r.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. 08.2017 Pronounced on:27. 10.2017 + LPA5312012 UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus KAMAL KUMAR ..... Appellants ..... Respondent And connected matters: + + + LPA5322012 LPA5342012 LPA5402012 Appearance: Mr. Baldev Malik with Mr. Arjun Malik, Advocates for appellants/UOI in all matters. Ms. Maneesha Dhir with Ms. Sarmishta Gosh, Mr. Nishant Piyush and Mr. Mahipal Singh, Advocates for respondents in all matters. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT The appeals are dismissed. For detailed judgment, the decision dated 27.10.2017 in LPA No.531/2012 may be referred to. OCTOBER27 2017 S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J SUNIL GAUR, J...
Tag this Judgment!Chanderbhan Malik vs.chander Prakash Sabharwal
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : October 27th, 2017 RFA132014 CHANDERBHAN MALIK ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Advocate with appellant in person. versus CHANDER PRAKASH SABHARWAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Naresh Gupta, Mr.Gaurav Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.JUDGMENT1 The appellant has filed the present appeal being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 18.12.2013 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi whereby the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff stood dismissed. The facts enumerating from the plaint filed before the Court 2. below are that the appellant/plaintiff had purchased a property no.1770, Gali No.7 & 8, Govindpuri Extension, Kalkaji, New Delhi- 110019 measuring 200 sq. yards from Shiv Dayal on 16.06.1966 for a sum of Rs.99/-. It was an agricultural land comprising khasra no.93. The said plot was mutated by the plaintiff/appellant with MCD on a sale value of Rs.900/-...
Tag this Judgment!Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.deveshwari Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-379 & 380 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL7512011 & CM157042011 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ... Appellant Through: Mr. Arun Yadav, Advocate versus DEVESHWARI DEVI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. for R- 1 & 2 + MAC APPEAL712012 DEVESHWARI DEVI & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus AKRAM & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Yadav, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vishwambar Pd. Joshi, a bachelor, aged 24 years, employed with Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. as Assistant Supervisor, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 30.05.2008 due to negligent driving of bus bearing registration no.DL-1PB-9169 and died in the consequence. His parents, appellants in MACA7112 MACA7512011 & 71/2012 Page 1 of 5 (collectively, the claimants) instituted accident claim case (MACT123608) on 30.07.2008 seeking compensation im...
Tag this Judgment!Iffco Tokio Genenral Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.anita Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~6 & 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.1063/2016 IFFCO TOKIO GENENRAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K.Soni, Adv. versus ANITA DEVI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. O.P. Mannnie, Adv. for R-1 to 6. + MAC APPEAL No.205/2017 ANITA DEVI & ORS. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Adv. versus YUDHVIR SIGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) Pankaj Kumar Mishra was running across the road on 1. 16.04.2015 at about 1.30 p.m. when he was hit by car bearing registration No.HR26 8712 and died due to the injuries consequently suffered. On the accident claim filed by his wife and MAC Appeal No.1063/2016 -conn Page 1 of 4 other members of the family dependent on him, they being appellants in MAC Appeal No.205/2017 instituted accident claim case (MACP No.86/16) on 05.10.2015.2. The motor accident claims tribunal held inquiry and...
Tag this Judgment!Delhi Development Authority & Anr. Vs.raju & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO No.327/2016 + % DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. ..... Appellants S. Bobde, 27th October, 2017 Through: Ms. Rukmini RAJU & ANR. Advocate. versus Through: Mr. R.K. Nain, Advocate for ........ RESPONDENTS respondent No.1. Mr. Akashdeep, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is filed against the order of the Employees Compensation Commissioner dated 4.3.2016 by which the Employees Compensation Commissioner has awarded an amount towards penalty under Section 4-A of the Act. FAO No.327/2016 Page 1 of 6 2. It is argued on behalf of the appellant no.1, and who was the respondent no.1 before the Employees Compensation Commissioner, that the claim application originally filed was allowed by the judgment dated 16.7.2013 passed by the...
Tag this Judgment!