Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 12 of about 590 results (0.019 seconds)Malkhan vs.state (Govt. Of Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.APPl. No.222/2012 Reserved on:16. h September, 2017 Date of decision :28. h October, 2017 MALKHAN Through Mr.Ajay Verma and .....Appellant Mr.Upendra Yogesh, Advs. Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI ... Respondent Through Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State with SI Hem Karan, PS Adarsh Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.1. The appellant-Malkhan has filed the present appeal challenging the order dated 21st November, 2011 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (NW)-01, Rohini convicting him of offences punishable under section 302 IPC and section 27 of the Arms Act. The appellant further challenges the order dated 23rd November, 2011 sentencing him to undergo RI for life and to pay a fine of Rs.7,000/- and in default SI for 2 months under Section 302 IPC and a further sentence of RI for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs.3,000/- and in Crl.A. 222/2012 Page 1 default SI for 3 mont...
Tag this Judgment!Balram vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~R-12A * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 190/2014 Judgment reserved on:29. h August 2017 Judgment pronounced on:27. h October 2017 BALRAM Through: versus Mr. Dhan Mohan, Mr. Tanu B. Mishra, Advocates. .....Appellant STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: .....Respondent Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 The present appeal has been instituted under Section 374 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (hereinafter referred as 'Cr.P.C.') by the appellant assailing the impugned judgment dated 07.12.2013 and order on sentence dated 16.12.2013 passed by the Court of Additional Session Judge, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, (FIR No.99/2012, P.S. Dwarka North, New Delhi), whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 376 of The Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') and was awarded rigorous imprisonment for ten years and a fine of Rs.30,000, and in default, to further undergo one year simple imprisonment.2. The case...
Tag this Judgment!Vijay Pal Singh vs.bharat Bhushan Gulati
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI27h October, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vijay Pal Singh, Adv., Appellant in person. RSA No.250/2017 * + % VIJAY PAL SINGH BHARAT BHUSHAN GULATI CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA versus ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the appellant/defendant/tenant in the suit impugning the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the Trial Court dated 21.11.2016 and the First Appellate Court dated 4.7.2017; by which the courts below have decreed the suit to the extent of relief of arrears of rent from April, 2014 till June, 2015 and has also granted mesne profits at RSA No.250/2017 Page 1 of 5 Rs.15,000/- per month from July, 2015 till the appellant/tenant vacated the suit premises.2. On the aspect of grant of mesne profits, it is argued by the appellant/defendant, who appeared in person and wh...
Tag this Judgment!Uoi & Ors vs.raman Kumar
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. 08.2017 Pronounced on:27. 10.2017 + LPA5312012 UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus KAMAL KUMAR ..... Appellants ..... Respondent And connected matters: + + + LPA5322012 LPA5342012 LPA5402012 Appearance: Mr. Baldev Malik with Mr. Arjun Malik, Advocates for appellants/UOI in all matters. Ms. Maneesha Dhir with Ms. Sarmishta Gosh, Mr. Nishant Piyush and Mr. Mahipal Singh, Advocates for respondents in all matters. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT The appeals are dismissed. For detailed judgment, the decision dated 27.10.2017 in LPA No.531/2012 may be referred to. OCTOBER27 2017 S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J SUNIL GAUR, J...
Tag this Judgment!Rajesh Kumar vs.shanta Vashisht
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : October 27th, 2017 RFA5192009 RAJESH KUMAR ..... Appellant Through Mr.R.D. Chauhan, Adv. with appellant in person. versus SHANTA VASHISHT ..... Respondent Through Mr.B.Tripathy & Mr.Randhir Pandey, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.JUDGMENT1 The present appeal has been filed by the appellant against the judgment and decree dated 05.12.2009 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi whereby the suit filed by the plaintiff/respondent recovery of possession, use/occupation charges/damages/mesne profits and mandatory injunction had been decreed in favour of the defendant/appellant. /respondent and against for the plaintiff 2. The facts enumerating from the plaint filed before the Court below are that the plaintiff/respondent is the owner of agricultural land RFA519/2009 Page 1of 7 and made some constructions therein. Thereafter, measuring 5 bighas and 19 biswas, situated at Khasra no.818, vi...
Tag this Judgment!Sheela Devi & Ors. Vs.mahender Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-377 & 378 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC APPEAL7042011 Decided on:27. h October, 2017 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Priyadarshi Acharya for Mr Sameer Nandwani, Advocate versus SHEELA DEVI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None + MAC APPEAL12092012 SHEELA DEVI & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: None versus MAHENDER SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Priyadarshi Acharya for Mr Sameer Nandwani, Advocate for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Rajender Kumar Moura, aged 42 years, working as Post Master in the Department of Posts of the Government of India, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 01.09.2007, MACA7042011 & 1209/2012 Page 1 of 4 while travelling as a passenger in three wheeler scooter bearing registration no.DL-1RG-4557 (TSR), it having collided against truck bearing registration no.HR-38K-6157 (the truck) and died in the consequence. His wife and five members of...
Tag this Judgment!National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.monika Gupta & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-375 & 376 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.684/2011 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. versus SUDHAKAR GUPTA & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC APPEAL No.686/2011 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. versus MONIKA GUPTA & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On inquiry into the two accident claim cases (suit nos. 6and 646A/2010), both instituted on 29.03.2006, the motor accident claims Tribunal by a common judgment dated 18.04.2011 held that a motor vehicular accident had occurred on 06.10.2005 involving collision between two motor vehicles, one being Kinetic scooter MAC Appeal No.684/2011 & conn. Page 1 of 4 bearing registration No.MH31AZ8873(the scooter) and, the other, Tata Eicher Canter bearing registration No.HR38 8759 (the Eicher Canter). The scooter was driven at the...
Tag this Judgment!Ram Kumar vs.income Tax Officer, Ward-64(2) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~6 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :27. h October, 2017 W.P.(C) 8035/2016 RAM KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Balbir Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Aneesh Mittal, Advocates. Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocates. Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-64(2) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Senior Standing Counsel & Mr. Anand Chaudhuri, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH SANJIV KHANNA, J.(Oral) The... Petitioner, Ram Kumar by way of the present writ petition has challenged the reassessment proceedings under Sections 147 read with Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act ) initiated vide notice dated 24th September, 2015 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2011-12. The... Petitioner has also challenged the order dated 8th August, 2016 rejecting the... Petitioners objections/representation against the assessment proceedings. re-opening of the 2. For AY201112, the... Petitioner had filed...
Tag this Judgment!n.s. Padmanabhan vs.national Institute of Immunology & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 27, 2017 W.P.(C) 3058/2017 & CM133732017 N.S. PADMANABHAN ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Shobha, Ms. Joyshree Berman and Mr. B. Kranthi Kumar, Advocates versus NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF IMMUNOLOGY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Harish Kumar Gupta, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 3 Mr. Ashish Wad, Advocate for respondent No.4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1.... Petitioner, who was the Controller of Administration in respondent No.1-Institute, had tendered his resignation of 31st March, 2017 due to personal reasons. Since petitioner had requested in the resignation letter of 31st March, 2017 (Annexure P-11 colly.) that he be relieved on 31st March, 2017 itself while seeking waiver of the notice period and if it is not possible, then the same be adjusted against his earned leave standing to his credit.2. First respondent claims that petitioners resignation letter was accepted on 1st April, 20...
Tag this Judgment!h.v. Kumar and Ors. Vs.delhi Treasury and Ors.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. 10.2017 $~ * + W.P.(C) 2162/2015 H.V. KUMAR AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sunil Dalal, Advocate versus DELHI TREASURY AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Ms. Niti Jain, Advocate for R-1 and R-3. Mr. Satyakam, Advocate/ASC (GNCTD) for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT1 The petitioners, in these writ proceedings, seek directions to the... RESPONDENTS (especially the second respondent) to pay them interest in the sum of 21,21,356/- on the amount of the compensation/award which was to be kept in FDR in terms of the order dated 09.05.2007 passed by Sh.T.R. Naval Ld. ADJ in LAC No.19A/2006 in an Award under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (the Act).2. The petitioners are legal representatives and heirs of one Sh. J.N. Kataria, owner of property bearing No.W-2 (Old No.42/2), West Patel Nagar, measuring 800 Sq.yds. (...
Tag this Judgment!