Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 11 of about 590 results (0.012 seconds)Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co Ltd vs.asha Verma & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~12 & 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h October, 2017 + MAC.APP. 618/2017 and CM Nos.25495-25496/2017 HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate versus ASHA VERMA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dwapayan Gupta and Mr. Umesh Kumar, Advocates + MAC.APP. 942/2017 and 38718-38719/2017 ASHA VERMA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Dwapayan Gupta and Mr. Umesh Kumar, Advocates versus HDFC ERGO GENRAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On accident claim case (MACT47542016) instituted on 27.07.2016 by the wife and son of Vikas Verma (deceased), they being appellants in MACA9422017, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), by judgment dated 16.02.2017, granted MAC A Nos.618/2017 & 942/2017 Page 1 of 3 compensation in the sum of Rs.69,70,000/- and held HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. (appellant in MACA6182017) liable...
Tag this Judgment!The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.sonu @ Sophia & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h October, 2017 + MAC.APP. 854/2015 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anshum Jain and Mr. Shiv Bhalla, Advocates versus SONU @ SOPHIA & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.K. Bachchan, Adv. for R-1 1. The first respondent is a transgender who claimed that he would earn his livelihood accordingly. On his accident claim case (suit no.186/2014) instituted on 02.11.2010, he was awarded compensation in the sum of Rs.6,95,108/- for the injuries suffered in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 02.09.2010 due to the negligent driving of a truck bearing registration No.MP-16-GA-0376 admittedly insured against third party with the appellant / insurance company (insurer). The said amount includes compensation calculated on account of the loss of earnings in future due to functional disability suffered evaluated at 35%, inter alia, based on the nat...
Tag this Judgment!Prashant Tokas & Anr vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 618/2016 PRASHANT TOKAS & ANR Date of decision: October 30, 2017 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. B.D. Sharma, Adv., Mr. Pramod Kumar and Ms. Shalu Jain, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: Mr. Rajan Khosla, Senior Panel ..... Respondent Counsel for UOI Ms. Sapna Chauhan, Adv. for DDA Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for L&B/LAC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek a declaration that the acquisition proceedings in respect of land admeasuring 03 Bighas and 14 Biswas, out of Khasra No.29/8/3(1-5), 1(1-5) and 18/3(1-4), situated in village Bamnoli, Delhi are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.2. Counsel for the petitioners submits that Section 4 notification was issued in the year 4th November, ...
Tag this Judgment!Daaj Hotels and Resorts Pvt Ltd vs.mukhram Tewatia
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h October, 2017 CM(M) 21/2017 DAAJ HOTELS AND RESORTS PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. D. Abhinav Rao, Adv. Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vivekanand, Adv. MUKHRAM TEWATIA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order (dated 22nd September, 2016 in CS No.57/2016 of the Court of Additional District Judge-02 (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi) of dismissal of an application of the petitioner / defendant under Order VII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC).2. The petition came up first before this Court on 11th January, 2017 and the counsel for the respondent has been appearing throughout.3. 4. The counsels have been heard. The respondent/plaintiff instituted the suit from which this petition arises, for recovery of Rs.56,75,097/- from the petitioner / defendant towards cost of work done by the respondent / plaintiff i...
Tag this Judgment!Deep Kumar & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 11484/2015 DEEP KUMAR & ORS Date of decision: October 30, 2017 Through: Mr. Ankit Verma, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for L&B/LAC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek a declaration that the acquisition proceedings in respect of land comprised in khasra nos. 9/4(4-16), 5(4-16), 6(4-16), 15(4-16), 26(0-05), 10/1(4-16) and 2(4-05) in all measuring 28 bighas 10 biswas situated within the revenue estate of village TikriKhurd, Delhi stands lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the New Act), on the ground that despite Section 4 Notification having been issued on 23rd February, 2003 being notification No.F....
Tag this Judgment!Om Prakash & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7147/2015 OM PRAKASH & ORS Date of decision: October 30, 2017 ........ Petitioners * % + Through: Mr. J.C. Mahindro, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for respondent L&B/LAC. Mr. Pawan Mathur, Standing Counsel CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Notifications under Section 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Award No.207 dated March 04, 1915 with a consequential prayer that the respondents be directed not to interfere and dispossess the petitioners from their land situated in Khasra Nos. 106, 107 and 108 of village Zamrudpur, New Delhi.2. In substance, the case of the petitioners is that in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Res...
Tag this Judgment!Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.baij Nath Prasad & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h October, 2017 + MAC.APP. 763/2015 & CM No.22620/2015 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Adv. versus BAIJ NATH PRASAD & ORS Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. By judgment dated 04.08.2015 in the accident claim case (MAC-P No.167/2009) instituted on 06.07.2009 by the first to fourth respondents (collectively, the claimants), the motor accident claims tribunal returned a finding that Dharamshila, aged 33 years, had suffered injuries on 11.06.1997 due to negligence on the part of the fifth respondent in driving a bus bearing registration No.DL1 3837 (the bus), making her fall down and, on that basis, held the said fifth respondent (driver) and the sixth respondent (registered owner of the bus), jointly and severally liable to pay compensation. It awarded total compensation in the sum of Rs. 8,52,040/- and fastened the liability to initia...
Tag this Judgment!State vs.atul Garg
Court: Delhi
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 563/2017 STATE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub- Inspector Arvind Kumar, Police Station Jaitpur, Delhi. versus ATUL GARG Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI ORDER3010.2017 % P.S. TEJI, J.Crl. M.A. No.16046/2017 (Condonation of delay of 423 days in filing the leave petition) & Crl.L.P. 381/2017 read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The State has filed the application under Section 5 of the for seeking Limitation Act condonation of delay of 423 days in preferring the accompanying leave petition to challenge the impugned judgment dated 26.04.2016 passed by learned Additional Session Judge-01, South-East District, Saket Courts, Delhi in S.C. No.123/2011 in case FIR No.161/2011, registered under Section 363/377/3of IPC at Police Station Jaitpur, Delhi. In the application for condonation of delay, it has been su...
Tag this Judgment!Birju Yadav vs.state
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.APPl. No.860/2012 Reserved on:16. h September, 2017 Date of decision :28. h October, 2017 BIRJU YADAV Through Ms.Rakhi Dubey, Advocate .....Appellant STATE (DHCLSC) Versus Through Mr.Amit Gupta, APP for the ... Respondent State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.The appellant, Briju Yadav, by way of present appeal impugns the order dated 23.12.2011 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-02 (South East) holding him guilty for the offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code (in short IPC) and also order of sentence dated 24.12.2011 sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment for life and further to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default to suffer simple imprisonment for the further period of six months.2. The case of the prosecution is that on 26.10.2009 an information was received from PCR on Police Post, Sri Niwas Puri, Crl.A. 860/2012 Page 1 PS Amar Colony that a ...
Tag this Judgment!Lalu Pasi vs.state
Court: Delhi
$ ~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. No.921/2015 & CRL. M.B. 1607/2017 .... Appellant LALU PASI Through: Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate STATE Versus ......Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, Addl. PP for State with SI Sumit Kataria, PS Nihal Vihar, Delhi. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. P. GARG HONBLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % C. HARI SHANKAR, J.(ORAL) (JUDGMENT) 28.10.2017 1. This appeal, at the instance of the accused Lalu Pasi, challenges the judgment, dated 13th July 2015, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (West)-04, Tis Hazari (hereinafter referred to as the learned ASJ), whereby and whereunder the learned ASJ has held the appellant guilty of murdering his father-in-law Hira Lal and convicted him, accordingly, under Sectionsof the Indian Penal Code, while acquitting him under Section 404 thereof. Also under challenge is the subsequent order on sentence, dated 16th July 2015, whereby the learned ASJ has sentenced the appellant to imprisonment for l...
Tag this Judgment!