Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri Ajay Kumar Singh vs.shri Rampal Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.251/2017 + % SHRI AJAY KUMAR SINGH30h October, 2017 Through: Garg, Advocate. ..... Appellant Mr. Anuj Kumar Versus SHRI RAMPAL SINGH CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.38713/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. CM No.38714/2017 (delay in filing) For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing is condoned subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. RSA No.251/2017 1. This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugning the concurrent RSA No.251/2017 Page 1 of 3 judgments of the courts below; of the trial court dated 2.6.2016 and the first appellate court dated 17.5.2017, by which the courts below have decreed the suit for possession filed by the respondent/plaintiff/landlord under Order XII Rule 6 CPC.2. In Delhi, once the ra...
Dr. Nizam Elanhi vs.north Delhi Municipal Corparation and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 30, 2017 + W.P.(C) 9509/2017 & C.Ms. 38636-37/2017 DR. NIZAM ELANHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Sastry & Mr. Ankur Gosain, Advocates Versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPARATION AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur & Mr. Shakti Priyan Nair, Advocates for respondent No.1 Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey & Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT ORAL1... Petitioner was as Assistant Teacher in a school of respondent- North, Municipal Corporation of Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the North MCD) and as per discharge Certificate of 6th November, 1989 (Annexure P-2), he was relieved from his duties on the said date and had joined second respondent- State Council of Educational Research & Training (henceforth referred to as the SCERT) on 7th November, 1989 as a Lecturer and though, petitioner had sought technical resignation, but he was treated...
Shikha Raghav vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1422/2017 Order reserved on :14. h September, 2017 Order pronounced on :30th October, 2017 SHIKHA RAGHAV Through: Mr. Puneet Goel, Advocate. ..Petitioner Versus THE STATE ..Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State with SI Virendra Kumar, PS Roop Nagar Delhi. Mr. Anand Verdhan Maitrega, Advocate with complainant in person. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 By way of the present petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.P.C.'), the petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.359/2016 under Sections 406/420/120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') registered at Police Station, Roop Nagar, New Delhi.2. The present case is registered on the complaint of one Santosh Bhardwaj who stated that Abhay, Pawan and Shikha/present petitioner have cheated Rs 60 lakhs from her. She alleged that the persons so named ...
Sangita Rani Arora & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7015/2016 Judgment reserved on: May 24, 2017 Judgment delivered on: October 30, 2017 SANGITA RANI ARORA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Adv. with Mr. Sri Om Swarup, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. with Mr. Pradeep Jha & Mr. Atul Krishan, Advs. for R-1 &4 Mr. Rajat Arora, Adv. for R-2 Mr. Rajesh Kumar with Mr. Gaurav Kr. Singh, Advs. for R-3/Canara Bank Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Adv. for R-6 Mr. Anil Soni, SC for AICTE CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J W.P.(C) 7015/2016 1. In view of order dated May 23, 2017, this petition survives only in respect of petitioner no.13, namely Raj Kumar.2. The challenge in this petition is primarily to a decision of the respondent no.3 Canara Bank cancelling the provisional allotment of petitioner no.13 to the post of Specialist Officer [(Marketing Officer) (Scale-I)]..3. The facts as noted from t...
Monsanto Holdings Pvt Ltd vs.m/s Real Agro Seeds & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
$~26 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 546/2016 MONSANTO HOLDINGS PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Ms.Nancy Roy with Mr.Rupin Bahl, Advocates. versus M/S REAL AGRO SEEDS & ANR ..... Defendants Through Mr.Sunil Verma with Mr.Mohinder Singh Sachdeva, Advocates for D-1. Date of Decision:30. h October, 2017 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral) I.A.No.12398/2017 1. Present joint application has been filed under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC. The same is duly signed by learned counsel for the plaintiff and defendant no.1 as well as by the authorized representatives of the said parties.2. Present application is also supported by the affidavits of authorized representative of the plaintiff and one of the partners of defendant no.1. CS (COMM) 546/2016 Page 1 of 6 3. Both the learned counsel state that the matter has been compromised qua defendant no.1 in accordance with the Settlement terms mentioned in the present application.4. Both t...
Lt. Col. b.b. Sharan (Retd) vs.mcd and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. 10.2017 + W.P.(C) 1758/2005 LT. COL. B.B. SHARAN (RETD) ........ Petitioner Through :... Petitioner in person. MCD AND ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Sh. Anil Grover, Standing Counsel with Ms. Kanika Singh, ASC; Ms. Mishal Vij, Sh. Rishi Vohra and Sh. Jitender. K. Tripathi, Advocates, for NDMC. Sh. Tarveen Singh Nanda and Sh. Rahul Singhal, Advocates, for DCB. Sh. Satyakam, ASC with Sh. Akshay Agarwal, Advocates, for GNCTD. Ms. Sakshi Popli, Advocate, for DJB. Sh. Rajan Tyagi, Advocate, for EDMC. Sh. Bhagvan. S. Shukla, CGSC with Sh. Shambhu Chaturvedi, Advocates, for UOI. Sh. Rajeev Bansal, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Shlok Chandra and Sh. Ritesh Kumar Sharma, Advocates, for DDA. Sh. Harshit Bansal, Legal Assistant, DSIIDC. + W.P.(C) 1783/2014, C.M. APPL.19009-10/2015 EBBANI AGGARWAL AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through :... Petitioner in person. SDMC AND ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Sh. Rajiv Bansal, Sr. Ad...
Sawhney Brothers vs.hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corpn.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. 09.2017 Pronounced on:30. 10.2017 REV. P. 176/2017 & CM Nos.17219-20/2017 IN LPA7252012 SAWHNEY BROTHERS ..... Appellants Through: In person versus HONGKONG & SHANGHAI BANKING CORPN. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ankur Goel, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT1 The present review petition has been filed by M/s. Sawhney Brothers through Mr. T.S. Sawhney (referred to as Mr. Sawhney) seeking review of the order dated 03.03.2014 passed by this Court, disposing of LPA No.725/2012. LPA No.725/2012 arose from the order of a learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P. (C) No.3569/2012, dated 01.06.2012, whereby the Single Judge dismissed the Writ Petition of Mr. Sawhney.2. The facts of the case are that Mr. Sawhney had filed in W.P. (C) No.3569/2012 before this Court to direct the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation (respondent bank) to disburse his ...
Kewal Krishan vs.state Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 2129/2017 & CRL.M.A. 17323/2017 Order reserved on 26th October, 2017 Order pronounced on 30th October, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Gita Dhingra, Advocate. KEWAL KRISHAN versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Anita Abraham, APP with SI Arvind Kumar, P.S. Vivek Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL CRL. M. A. No.17323/2017 Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 2129/2017 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.PC read with Section 482 Cr.PC for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.425/2017 under Section 419/420/467/471/170/ 120-B/34 IPC registered at Police Station Vivek Vihar on the allegation that the accused persons extorted money from the complaint on the pretext of getting him a government job to him. BAIL APPLN. 2129/2017 Page 1 of 5 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the peti...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-8 vs.st Microelectronics Private ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 10.2017 ITA9132017 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-8 ..... Appellant Through versus ST MICROELECTRONICS PRIVATE LTD. ..... Respondent Through Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : : Mr Sanjay Kumar with Mr. Rahul Chaudary, Advocates. None. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) CM NO.38878/2017 (for condonation of delay) For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The delay of 69 days in filing the appeal is condoned. ITA9132017 1. The question of law urged in this case is whether the deletion of 16 comparables originally proposed by the Transfer Pricing Officer ITA9132017 Page 1 of 5 (TPO) in the course of assessment for AY20072008, in the ALP (Arms Length Price) determination, conducted in respect of the assessee, is erroneous.2. The facts are that the assessee is e...
Honshu Buildcon Pvt Ltd vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2017
$~58 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI\ O.M.P.(I)(COMM) 130/2017 Date of decision:30. h October, 2017 HONSHU BUILDCON PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rajesh Gupta and Mr.Harpreet Singh, Advs. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. Through Ms.Mini Pushkarna, Senior ........ RESPONDENTS Standing Counsel with Ms.Anushruthi, Ms.Vasundhra Nayyar, Mr.Ashwani Mathur and Mr.Sandeep Chopra, Advs CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) This petition under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred as Act) has been filed by the petitioner Honshu Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. praying therein for a stay of implementation of the impugned Cancellation Letter dated 10th March, 2017 issued by the respondent No.1. OMP(I)(COMM) 130/2017 Page 1 2. Respondent no.1 had issued a Notice Inviting Tender dated 22nd April, 2016 for allotment of cluster-wise display of advertisement within its jurisdiction that is North Delhi Municipal Corpor...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »