Delhi Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raj Kumar Vaswan & Ors. Vs.commissioner of Police & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2017
$~24. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.10748/2016 RAJ KUMAR VASWAN & ORS. ........ Petitioners Date of decision:27. h January, 2017 Through Ms. Rekha Palli, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Punam Singh & Ms. Ankita Patnaik, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, ASC & Ms. Sona Babbar, Advocate for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The petitioners, eleven in number, in this writ petition have raised a limited challenge. Their grievance is that the respondents are not complying with the directions given in paragraph 16 of the impugned order dated 16th July, 2016 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) whereby OA No.1899/2016, Raj Kumar Vaswan and Others versus Commissioner of Police and Others and connected OAs were disposed of. Paragraph 16 of the order dated 16th July, 2016 reads ...
Icici Bank Ltd vs.ajit Nagar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2017
$~A-45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:27. 01.2017 + CM(M) 87/2017 and CM No.3001/2017 ICICI BANK LTD AJIT NAGAR Through versus Through ........ Petitioner Mr.Puneet K.Bhalla, Ms. Chetna Bhalla, Advs ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) CM No.3001/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM(M) 87/2017 1. An advance copy of the petition has been sent to the respondent but none is present on behalf of the respondent.2. By the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 03.01.2017 of the trial court by which summons were issued in the suit and arguments were heard on the application under Order 40 Rule 1 CPC for appointment of Receiver for the hypothecated vehicle but no orders were passed in the same.3. The petitioner has filed a suit for recovery of Rs.5,60,153.09/-. It is Page 1 of 5 stated that the respondent had approached...
Icici Bank Ltd vs.kasmeera Devi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2017
$~A-53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:27. 01.2017 + CM(M) 99/2017 and CM No.3047/2017 ICICI BANK LTD Through versus KASMEERA DEVI Through ........ Petitioner Mr.Puneet K.Bhalla, Ms. Chetna Bhalla, Advs ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) CM No.3047/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM(M) 99/2017 1. An advance copy of the petition has been sent to the respondent but none is present on behalf of the respondent.2. By the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 13.01.2017 of the trial court by which summons were issued in the suit and no orders were passed in the application filed by the petitioner for appointment of a receiver in taking the custody of the hypothecated vehicle.3. The petitioner has filed a suit for recovery of Rs.3,72,012.90/-. It is Page 1 of 5 stated that the respondent had approached the petition...
Sh. Sanjeev Kumar and Ors. Vs.government of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.7873/2007 27th January, 2017 ........ Petitioners * + % SH. SANJEEV KUMAR AND ORS. Through: Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Satyakam, Advocate for R-1 & 2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the three petitioners seek the relief of being granted a particular higher scale of pay under the ACP scheme dated 9.8.1999 and which became applicable to Lab Assistants by the order of the Directorate of Education dated 2.6.2006. The issue in this case is what is the higher grade of pay to which petitioners are entitled to in view of the applicability of the ACP scheme to the petitioners who are Lab Assistants.2. The counter affidavit filed by the respondent nos. 1 and 2/Directorate of Education shows that the petitioners on accou...
Mashih-Ui-Hakeem Ajmal Khan Memorial Foundation vs.govt. Of Nct of Del ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2017
$~6. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9599/2016 MASHIH-UI-HAKEEM AJMAL KHAN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION Through: Mr. A.J.Khan, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate for R-1. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia ORDER2701.2017 1. for directions to the respondents/GNCTD to hold elections in respect of respondent No.2/Bhartiya Chikitsa Parisad by physical direct secret ballot and ensure that no postal ballot is permitted except in special cases, where such a request is made.2. On the last date of hearing, counsel for the petitioner was directed to place on record documents to substantiate the averments made in the petition to the effect that the Executive Body of the respondent No.2 had been dissolved and an Administrator appointed.3. Counsel for the petitioner states that he has filed the relevant documents on an affid...
Icici Bank Ltd vs.amit Aggarwal & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2017
$~A-44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:27. 01.2017 + CM(M) 86/2017 and CM No.3000/2017 ICICI BANK LTD Through versus AMIT AGGARWAL & ANR Through ........ Petitioner Mr.Puneet K.Bhalla, Chetna Bhalla Advs ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) CM No.3000/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM(M) 86/2017 1. An advance copy of the petition has been sent to the respondent but none is present on behalf of the respondent.2. By the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 03.01.2017 of the trial court by which summons were issued in the suit and arguments were heard on the application under Order 40 Rule 1 CPC for appointment of Receiver for the hypothecated vehicle but no orders were passed in the same.3. The petitioner has filed a suit for recovery of Rs.8,28,699.73/-. It is Page 1 of 5 stated that the respondent had ap...
Icici Bank Ltd vs.rajarshi Guha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2017
$~A-52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:27. 01.2017 + CM(M) 97/2017 and CM No.3044/2017 ICICI BANK LTD Through versus RAJARSHI GUHA Through ........ Petitioner Mr.Puneet K.Bhalla, Ms. Chetna Bhalla, Advs ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) CM No.3044/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM(M) 97/2017 1. An advance copy of the petition has been sent to the respondent but none is present on behalf of the respondent.2. By the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 03.01.2017 of the trial court by which summons were issued in the suit and arguments were heard on the application under Order 40 Rule 1 CPC for appointment of Receiver for the hypothecated vehicle but no orders were passed in the same.3. The petitioner has filed a suit for recovery of Rs.3,54,603.05/-. It is Page 1 of 5 stated that the respondent had approac...
Ashish Bharti vs. Meeta Sachdev
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2017
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On : January 17, 2017 Judgment Delivered On : January 27, 2017 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 42/2016 ASHISH BHARTI ..... Appellant Represented by : Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Sr Advocate instructed by Ms.Beenashaw Soni & Mr.Sandeep Kumar, Advocates. versus MEETA SACHDEV ..... Respondent Represented by : Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Sr Advocate instructed Mr.Ankur Mahindro & Mr.Govind Kumar, Advocates. by WITH + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 52/2016 MEETA SACHDEV ..... Appellant Represented by : Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Sr Advocate instructed Mr.Ankur Mahindro & Mr.Govind Kumar, Advocates. by versus MAT.APP.(F.C.) Nos.42 & 52 of 2016 Page 1 of 15 ASHISH BHARTI ..... Respondent Represented by : Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Sr Advocate instructed by Ms.Beenashaw Soni & Mr.Sandeep Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. Since the husband as also the wife are aggrieved by the order dated February 20, 2016 disposing of an a...
Sh. Hari Kishore Sharma vs.chief Secretary, Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.11098/2015 27th January, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Advocate. SH. HARI KISHORE SHARMA CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks continuation of his contractual appointment, and which has otherwise come to an end on 16.02.2015.... Petitioner impugns the advertisement dated 14-20.11.2015 issued by the respondent No.2/Delhi Technological University/employer inviting candidates for the post in question of Assistant Engineer (Civil), and in which post the petitioner had worked, by means of transfer on deputation basis from Centre/State Government/NCT of Delhi/University/Autonomous Body/Government W.P.(C) No.11098/2015 Page 1 of 9...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.durga Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2017
$~R-204 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: January 27, 2017 MAC. APP.497/2008 & C.M.17050/2009 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Manoj Ranjan Sinha, Advocate versus DURGA DEVI & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Vishnu, Advocate for Respondent No.9 + % (ORAL) JUDGMENT Impugned Award of 22nd July, 2008 grants compensation of `1,57,000/- with interest @ 9 % per annum to respondents-claimants in respect of death of one Mahinder Singh Thappa in a road accident on 28th September, 1994. The facts of this case are already noted in the impugned Award and so, need no reproduction. Suffice to note that impugned Award puts the liability squarely on appellant to pay the awarded amount while noting that there is no sufficient evidence on record to prove that driver-Ravi was served with the Notice under Order 12 Rule 8 CPC for Page 1 of 4 Mac.App.497/2008 producing the original driving licence. It is also ...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »