Delhi Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nalian Engineers Private Limited vs.sunrays Engineers Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:06. 12.2016 Judgment Pronounced On:30. 01.2017 CO.PET.268/2016 NALIAN ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED ..Petitioner/Transferor Company AND SUNRAYS ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED ..Petitioner/Transferee Company Through: Mr. Dilip Singh, Advocate for the... Petitioners. Ms. Aparna Mudiam, Assistant ROC, Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for the OL. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present petition has been filed jointly under Sections 391(2) and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by Nalian Engineers Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company) and Sunrays Engineers Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferee Company), seeking sanction of the scheme of amalgamation CO.PET.268/2016 Page 1 of 1 (hereinafter referred to as the Scheme) of the Transferor Company with the Transferee Company.2. The registered offices of each of the... Petitioner Com...
Durga vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2017
* % + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:4. h January, 2017 Decided on:30. h January, 2017 CRL.A. 1205/2016 PAWAN STATE Represented by: Mr. M.P. Sharma, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the CRL.A. 1206/2016 State with ASI Prem Chand, PS Ali Pur. DURGA STATE Represented by: Mr. M.P. Sharma, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the CRL.A. 1207/2016 State with ASI Prem Chand, PS Ali Pur. ..... Appellant RAJINDER KUMAR @ AMAN Represented by: Mr. M.P. Sharma, Advocate. STATE versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the CRL.A. 1212/2016 State with ASI Prem Chand, PS Ali Pur. CRL.A. Nos. 1205/2016, 1206/2016, 1207/2016, 1212/2016 Page 1 of 7 SUNNY STATE Represented by: Mr. M.P. Sharma, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok K. Garg, APP for the State with ASI Prem Chand, PS Ali Pur. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. J...
Mukesh Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : January 30, 2017 CRL.A. 341/2000 MUKESH KUMAR Through: Mr. D.K. Mathur, Advocate ..... Appellant versus STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State ..... Respondent P.S.TEJI, J.JUDGMENT1 Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 30.05.2000 passed by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, whereby appellant has been convicted for the offence under S. 498 A of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as I.P.C) and vide order on sentence dated 02.06.2000 has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years with fine of Rs.15,000/- for the offence under Section 498-Aof IPC and in default of payment to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for eight months, the appellant has filed this present criminal appeal.2. The facts of the case, as emerging from the record are that on 24.06.1997, wife of the appellant Seem...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.suman & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h January, 2017 $~37 * % + MAC.APP. 266/2015 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Mr. Shoumik Mazumdar, Adv. ..... Appellant versus SUMAN & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anshuman Bal, Adv. for respondents no.1 to 5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.9,80,810/- has been awarded to respondents no.1 to 5.2. The accident dated 8th October, 2008 resulted in the death of Rajbeer Singh. The deceased was aged 38 years at the time of the accident and was survived by his widow, two sons, one minor daughter and mother who filed the claim petition before the Claims Tribunal. It was claimed that the deceased was in private service earning Rs.8,000/- per month. However, the Claims Tribunal took minimum wages of Rs.3,683/- per month in respect of an unskilled person, added 50% towards inflation, deducted 1/4th towards the p...
Ranveer Singh vs.nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~57. * + % W.P.(CRL) 319/2017 RANVEER SINGH Date of Decision:30. 01.2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravindra S. Garia, N.K. Khanna, Amitabh Nihar and Rakesh Bhati, Advocates versus N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with Mr. Peeyush Bhatia, Adv for State with SI Sanjeev Kumar, PS Vivek Vihar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to seek the quashing of FIR6162015 dated 09.07.2015 registered u/s 420/4IPC at PS Vivek Vihar. The premise on which the said prayer is made is that on the same facts, respondent no.2/ complainant had preferred a complaint u/s 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, which has been dismissed in default for want of prosecution on 20.08.2015 by the Ld. Judicial Magistrate. The petitioner has placed reliance on section 256 Cr PC to submit that the dismissal of the said complaint tantamounts to acquittal of t...
Marvel Farm Products Private Limited vs.knowledgeage Technologies Priv ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:08. 12.2016 Judgment Pronounced On:30. 01.2017 CO.PET.626/2016 MARVEL FARM PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED ..Petitioner/Transferor Company No.1 AND DYNAMIC ORBITS MANAGEMENT SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED ..Petitioner/Transferor Company No.2 AND KNOWLEDGEAGE TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED ..Petitioner/Transferee Company Through: Mr. Dhruv Gupta and Mr. Ashutosh Gupta, Advocates for the... Petitioners. Ms. Aparna Mudiam, Assistant ROC. Mr. Ashish Makhija, Advocate for the OL. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present petition has been filed jointly under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by Marvel Farm CO.PET.626/2016 Page 1 of 1 Products Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company No.1), Dymanic Orbits Management Services Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company No.2) and Knowledgeage Technologies Private ...
Sunil Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h January, 2017 Decided on:30. h January, 2017 CRL.A. 634/2001 SUNIL KUMAR STATE Represented by: Ms. Shradha Karol, ..... Appellant Versus Represented by: Ms.Vasundhara Nagrath and Mr. Varun Chawla, Advs. with appellant. ..... Respondent Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Sunil Kumar challenges the impugned judgment dated 27th July, 2001 convicting him for offences punishable under Section 366/368/376 IPC and the order on sentence dated 3rd August, 2001 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years with a fine of `500/- each for the offences punishable under Section 366/368/376 IPC.2. The prosecution case springs out of a complaint lodged on 12th March 1998 by PW-11, father of the prosecutrix, wherein he stated that on 9th March, 1998 around 8:30 P.M., PW-1the prosecutrix left the home without informing anyone. On 10th March, 1998, he had lodged a mis...
Ghanshyam Dass & Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2017
% + W.P.(C) 857/2015 & CM No.1502/2015 GHANSHYAM DASS & ORS. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners ...... Petitioners versus ...... RESPONDENTS $~21 THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:30. 01.20 Mr Rajesh Yadav with Ms Ruchika Arora and Mr Dhananjay Mehlawat : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi : Mr Arjun Pant with Mr Mayank Mikhail Mukherjee For the Respondent/LAC For the Respondent/DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioners, consequently seek a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter ref...
The New India Assurance Co Ltd. Vs.dr. Saurabh Kumar Gupta @ Saurabh G ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (i) + MAC.APP. 573/2008 Date of decision: January 30, 2017 DR.SAURABH KUMAR GUPTA @ SAURABH GUPTA Through: Mr. S.P. Singh Chaudhary & Mr. Y.R. Sharma, Advocates ..... Appellant Versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Akhilesh Kr. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3 (ii) + MAC.APP. 600/2008 Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate ..... Appellant THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD (iii) + MAC.APP. 602/2008 & C.M.5157/2009 DR. SAURABH KUMAR GUPTA @ SAURABH GUPTA AND ORS. Versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.P. Singh Chaudhary & Mr. Y.R. Sharma, Advocates for respondent No.1 Mr. Akhilesh Kr. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3 MAC.APP.573, 600 & 602 of 2008 Page 1 of 7 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL1 JUDGMENT The above captioned three appeals are directed against common impugned Award of 2nd August, 2008 vide which compensation of `15,90,000/- and `2,75,000/- wi...
Anju @ Ajay vs.yogesh Bansal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2017
Represented by: Mr. Ajay Paul, Advocate. ..... Respondent ANJU @ AJAY versus YOGESH BANSAL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. $~R-20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.A.(F.C.) 84/2016 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Sugriva Dubey, Advocate. Vide impugned order dated June 03, 2016 the learned Judge Family Court has annulled the marriage between the parties by granting a decree for divorce on ground of desertion as well as cruelty. The cruelty held proved is denial of conjugal bliss by the appellant to the respondent for about 2 months after the marriage took place. Unproved allegations of adultery by the appellant against the respondent lodging a false complaint that the respondent tried to kidnap the child of the parties and denial of access to the respondent to meet the son. False allegation in the written statement that she was compelled to leave the matrimonial house when she was beaten and ...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »