Delhi Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Arshpreet Kaur vs.guru Teg Bahadur Polytechnic Institute and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.811/2017 30th January, 2017 ARSHPREET KAUR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurabh Chadda, Advocate. versus GURU TEG BAHADUR POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 4. Mr. Anil Soni, Advocate for AICTE. Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed seeking the relief of quashing of order of termination of services dated 13.1.2017 passed by the respondent no.1/employer against the petitioner. Respondent no.1 is admittedly managed by the Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee and with respect to maintainability of petitions against the educational institutions run by W.P.(C) No.811/2017 Page 1 of 5 the Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee, various judgments have...
Delhi & District Cricket Association Through Its Honorary General Secr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7215/2011, C.M. APPL.16416/2011, 1125/2013, 27732/2016 & 32226/2016 Reserved on:27. 09.2016 Pronounced on:30. 01.2017 DELHI & DISTRICT CRICKET ASSOCIATION THROUGH ITS HONORARY GENERAL SECRETARY ........ Petitioner Through : Sh. Aman Lekhi, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Gautam Dutta, Standing Counsel and Sh. Sanjay Dhawan, versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS......... RESPONDENTS Through : Sh. Rahul Mehra, Sr. Standing Counsel, for GNCTD. Sh. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Tanuj Khurana and Sh. P. Chaitanyashil, Advocates, for Sh. Dinesh Saini, Joint Secretary, Company Affairs, DDCA. Sh. Rohit Gandhi, Advocate, for applicant in C.M. Appl.32226/2016. Sh. Manish Tewari, Sh. Amit. A. Pai and Sh. Rahat Bansal, Advocates, for Intervener/Sh. Kirti Azad. Sh. Ajjay Aroraa with Sh. D.K. Puchnanda, Advocates, for SDMC. Sh. Nitin Mishra, Ms. Akanksha Rastogi and Ms. Arunabha Ganguli, Advocates, for Justice Mukul Mudgal (Retd). Sh. Rahul Me...
Union of India Through the Secretary, Department of Personnel & Traini ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.8758/2014 % Date of Decision:30. h January, 2017 Reserved on:30. h November, 2016 UNION OF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL & TRAINING AND OTHERS ....Petitioners INDIA THROUGH THE Through Mr. R.V. Sinha, Advocate. V. APPALLA RAJU Versus ..Respondent Through Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S.K. Gupta & Mr. Sameer, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.This writ petition by the Union of India and its functionaries impugns the order dated 15th July, 2014 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) whereby OA No.107/2013 filed by V. Appalla Raju, the respondent before us, has been allowed with the direction that the respondent would be promoted as Commissioner of Income Tax with effect from 11th July, 2009, the date his immediate junior was promoted, and he would be entitled to consequential benefits o...
Rrj Infrastructure Companyprivate Limited vs.pearl Drinks Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:05. 12.2016 Judgment pronounced on:30. 01.2017 CO.PET. 479/2016 IN THE MATTER OF:-"RRJ INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANYPRIVATE LIMITED .... Petitioner /Transferor Company No.1 AND FOUNTAIN BEVERAGES PRIVATE LIMITED .... Petitioner/Transferor Company No.2 WITH PEARL DRINKS LIMITED ... Petitioner /Transferee Company Through: Mr. Mukesh Sukhija, Advocate for the... Petitioners, Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate the OL, Ms. Aparna Mudiam, for Assistant ROC for the Regional Director. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present petition has been filed jointly, under sections 391and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by RRJ CO.PET. 479/2016 Page 1 of 9 Infrastructure Company Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company No.1), Fountain Beverages Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company No.2) and Pearl Drinks Limited (hereinafter referred...
National Highways Authority of India vs.pcl – Suncon (Jv)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~R-263 * + NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA O.M.P. 524/2009 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Gunjan Sinha Jain & Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocates. versus PCL SUNCON (JV) ..... Respondent Through: Dr. Amit George & Mr. Swaroop George, CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR Advocates. % ORDER3001.2017 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenges an Award dated 9th May, 2009 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal (AT) in the disputes between the NHAI and the Respondent PCL-SUNCON JV arising out of a Contract Agreement (CA) dated 28th March 2002 for the work of four- laning and strengthening of the existing two lanes between km 317 and km 65 on NH-2 in the States of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, which was awarded by NHAI to the Respondent.2. The contract was an item rate contract. The Respondent had quoted its rates for various items as per the details given in the Technic...
Rajinder Kumar @ Aman vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2017
* % + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:4. h January, 2017 Decided on:30. h January, 2017 CRL.A. 1205/2016 PAWAN STATE Represented by: Mr. M.P. Sharma, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the CRL.A. 1206/2016 State with ASI Prem Chand, PS Ali Pur. DURGA STATE Represented by: Mr. M.P. Sharma, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the CRL.A. 1207/2016 State with ASI Prem Chand, PS Ali Pur. ..... Appellant RAJINDER KUMAR @ AMAN Represented by: Mr. M.P. Sharma, Advocate. STATE versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the CRL.A. 1212/2016 State with ASI Prem Chand, PS Ali Pur. CRL.A. Nos. 1205/2016, 1206/2016, 1207/2016, 1212/2016 Page 1 of 7 SUNNY STATE Represented by: Mr. M.P. Sharma, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok K. Garg, APP for the State with ASI Prem Chand, PS Ali Pur. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. J...
Nathia Devi vs.new Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2017
Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate, Ms. Wanika Trehan, Ms. Gari P. Desai, Ms. Aastha Dhawan, Advocates. ........ Petitioner NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC for NDMC. Mr. Naryana Kumar, ALO, NDMC. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI NATHIA DEVI $~29 * + W.P.(C) 835/2017 & CMs No.3810 & 3811/2017 versus CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER3001.2017 1. The petitioner has assailed the cancellation order dated 24.1.2017 passed by the respondent/NDMC cancelling the allotment of a Flower Kiosk near gate No.6, Palika Bazar and restraining it from initiating any proceedings against her under Section 5 of The Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act,1971 (hereinafter referred to as the PP Act).2. Mr. Uppal, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that prior to issuing the show cause notice dated 15.12.2016, the respondent/NDMC had initiated proceedings against the petitioner und...
National Human Rights Commission and Others vs.anil Kumar Joshi and An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.3668/2014 % Reserved on:16. h November, 2016 Date of Decision:30. h January, 2017 NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION AND OTHERS ....Petitioners Through Mr. R.V. Sinha & Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates. Versus ANIL KUMAR JOSHI AND ANOTHER ..Respondents Through Mr. Feroze Ahmad and Mr. Ajmal Hussaini, Advocates. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.4831/2014 S.S. GOSAIN ....Petitioner Through Mr. S.K. Gupta and Mr. Ramesh K. Shukla, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ..Respondents Through Mr. Vivek Goyal, Central Government Standing Counsel for UOI. Mr. R.V. Sinha & Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates for NHRC. Mr. Feroze Ahmad and Mr. Ajmal Hussaini, Advocates for respondent No.4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR W.P. (C) Nos. 3668/2014 & 4831/2014 Page 1 of 14 SANJIV KHANNA, J.The National Human Rights Commission (Commission, for short), its functionaries and S.S. Gosain have filed the present Wr...
Roop Kumar Sharma & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.10569/2016 30th January, 2017 ROOP KUMAR SHARMA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Arman Roop Sharma, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Abhishek Khanna, Govt. Pleader for R-1/Union of India. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners argues that there is mis- joinder of causes of action and parties so far as 15 petitioners are concerned inasmuch as cases of petitioner nos. 1,2 and 15 are on a different plane as compared to other petitioners nos. 3 to 14 inasmuch as whereas petitioners nos. 3 to 14 have taken Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS), petitioner nos. 1,2 and 15 have normally retired from the respondent no.2/company. Accordingly, it is prayed, and which prayer is allowed, giving liberty to the petitioners nos. 1,2 and 15 to file a fresh writ petition not only on the facts WP(C) ...
Shobha Printers Private Limited vs.lahar Enterprises Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO. APPL. (M) 167/2016 IN THE MATTER OF: Order Reserved on:14.12.2016 Order Delivered on:30. 01.2017 SHOBHA PRINTERS PRIVATE LIMITED ...Applicant/Demerged Company AND LAHAR ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED Through: Mr. Rajiv K. Goel, Advocate Applicant/Resultant Company CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present application has been filed jointly, under Sections 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by Shobha Printers Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Demerged Company) and Lahar Enterprises Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Resultant Company) in connection with the Scheme of Arrangement (hereinafter referred to as the Scheme) for the demerger of the real-estate business of the Demerged Company into the Resultant Company. CO.APPL.(M) 167/2016 Page 1 of 6 2. The registered offices of the Applicant Companies are situated within the National Capital Territory ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »