Delhi Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Action Committee Unaided Recognized Private Schools vs.delhi Developme ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
37 $~ * + W.P.(C) 272/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ACTION COMMITTEE UNAIDED RECOGNIZED PRIVATE SCHOOLS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kamal Gupta, Advocate. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Akshita Manocha and Ms. Isha Garg for Mr.Dhanesh Relan with Ms.Isha Garg, Advocates for DDA. Mr. S. Guru Krishnakumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Mehra, Mr. Gautam Narayan, Mr. Santosh Kr. Tripathi, Mr. R.A. Iyer, Ms. R. Sneha and Mr. Tushar, Advocates for GNCT of Delhi. Mr. Khagesh B. Jha, Advocate for applicant in CM No.1587/2017. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN ORDER1301.2017 % The matter has been received today by way of typed supplementary list. CM Appl. 1355/2017 (exemption) in W.P.(C) 272/2017 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. CM Appl. 1587/2017 (impleadment) in W.P.(C) 272/2017 Mr. Khagesh B. Jha, learned counsel has filed an impleadment application on behalf of Justice for All. Issue ...
Biobase Databases India Private Limited vs.qiagen India Private Limite ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:13.01.2017 CO. APPL. (M) 104/2016 IN THE MATTER OF: BIOBASE DATABASES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ...Transferor Company AND CLC BIO INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ...Transferor Company WITH QIAGEN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ...Transferee Company/Applicant Through: Mr. Peeush Sharma, Mr. Shaurya M. and Mr. Kartikey Nayyar, Tomar Advocates for the Applicants. . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present application has been filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with rules 6 & 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, by Qiagen India Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Applicant Company/Transferee Company) in respect of the Scheme of Amalgamation (hereinafter referred to as the CO.APPL.(M) 104/2016 Page 1 of 1 Scheme) between Biobase Databases India Private Limited (herein after referred to as Transferor Company) and CLC Bio India Private Limited...
Gajender Sharma vs.sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h January, 2017 CRL.M.C. 2626/2011 GAJENDER SHARMA ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Bijender Singh, Ms. Vidushi, Advs. SREE GOKULAM CHIT & FINANCE PVT LTD ..... Respondent Represented by: None versus CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (in short NI Act) was filed by the respondent against the petitioner as proprietor of Vashisht Transport Company being criminal complaint No.384/2006. In the complaint respondent alleged that the petitioner subscribed to a chit fund group and took payment for a bid through cheque after deducting the bid amount. After some payments in installments were made the petitioner became irregular in making the payments of the installments towards the chit fund. In order to discharge his liability, the petitioner issued cheque bearing No.645580 dated 14th September, 2006 for 5,47,740/- drawn on Indian Overs...
Forum for Promotion of Quality Education for All and Ors. Vs.dda and O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
39 $~ * + W.P.(C) 287/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FORUM FOR PROMOTION OF QUALITY EDUCATION FOR ALL AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sunil Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vedanta Varma, Mr. Sushil Dutt Salwan, Mr. Vibhor Kush, Mr. Archil Kumar Gola, Mr. Sanat Tokas, Mr. Prateek Gautam, Advocates. versus DDA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Akshita Manocha and Ms. Isha Garg for Mr.Dhanesh Relan with Ms.Isha Garg, Advocates for DDA. Mr. S. Guru Krishnakumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Mehra, Mr. Gautam Narayan, Mr. Santosh Kr. Tripathi, Mr. R.A. Iyer, Ms. R. Sneha and Mr. Tushar, Advocates for GNCT of Delhi. Mr. Khagesh B. Jha, Advocate for applicant in CM No.1587/2017. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN ORDER1301.2017 The matter has been received today by way of typed supplementary % list. CM Appl. 1772/2017 (amendment) in W.P.(C) 287/2017 Present application has been filed for amendment of the writ petition on the ground that there were certain ...
Sh. J. Chandra Hassan vs.m/s Indian Airlines Ltd. & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
* + % SH. J.CHANDRA HASSAN IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.2333/1997 13th January, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anoop Awasthi Ms.Madhumita, Advocates. and versus M/S INDIAN AIRLINES LTD. & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Lalit Bhasin, Advocate for R-1 & 2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was allowed by a detailed judgment passed on 1.7.2013. The writ petition was allowed by granting to the petitioner notional promotion to the post of Assistant Manager/Security Officer/Vigilance Officer with effect from 11.11.1993 as also certain consequential benefits. Interest was also granted.2. The judgment dated 1.7.2013 was carried in appeal by the respondent No.1 and this appeal being LPA No.690/2013 was disposed of by a consent order dated 7.3.2014 by setting aside the judgment dated 1.7.2013. Counsel W.P.(C) No.2333/19...
Goienkars Digital Network Pvt. Ltd. Vs.ministry of Information and Bro ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~18 * % + W.P.(C) 11541/2016 GOIENKARS DIGITAL NETWORK PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Judgment delivered on:13. 01.2017 MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : None. : Mr. Kirtiman Singh with Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Pranav Aggarwal and Mr. Prateek Dhandha, Advocate for TRAI. Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate for UOI. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT1301.2017 1. Notice was directed to be issued to the petitioner as this matter has been received on transfer under orders of the Supreme Court. Affidavit of service has been filed indicating that the notice has been duly served on the petitioner. The petition has been filed inter-alia seeking grant of time for 2. WP(C) 11541/2016 Page 1 of 3 installing the set-top boxes and till the completion of installation of set top ...
Mohd Kamil vs.nihar Dass
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-2017
$~18. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA32014 and CM APPL. 187/2014, 929/2014 MOHD KAMIL Through: Mr. Avinash Trivedi, Advocate ..... Appellant versus NIHAR DASS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh M. Goel, Advocate with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER1201.2017 CM APPL. 558/2017 (joint application u/O XXIII R3CPC) 1. The present application has been jointly filed by the parties stating inter alia that during the pendency of the appeal, they have been able to arrive at an out of court settlement.2. Counsels for the parties state that a sum of Rs.7,61,381/- was deposited by the appellant in the shape of a FDR, which is available on the record. The parties have agreed that after the FDR is released by the Registry to the appellant and encashed, a sum of Rs.7 lacs shall be released by the concerned Bank directly in favour of the respondent and the balance amount with upto date interest shall be refunded to the appellant.3. The Court has per...
National Highways Authority of India vs.mbl Infrastructure Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-2017
O.M.P. 814/2011 & IAs 394/2017, 395/2017 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ujjwal K. Jha, Advocates. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * 7. + % 1. This petition by National Highways Authority of India/ NHAI under MBL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR Through: Ms. Anusuya Salwan and Mr. Kunal Kohli, Advocates. ORDER1201.2017 ...... Respondent versus Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) challenges the Award dated 12th April 2011 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal (AT) in the disputes between the NHAI and the Respondent MBL Infrastructure Ltd., formerly known as (Maheshwari Brothers Ltd.) arising out of a contract dated 24th August 2006, whereby the work of short term improvement and routine maintenance of section of National Highway No.2 Barwa Adda-Panagarh Section in the State of Bihar and West Bengal was awarded to the Respondent.2. The period of contract was 12 months f...
Govind Rathi & Anr vs.national Crimes Bureau
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h January, 2017 Decided on:12. h January, 2017 BAIL APPLN. 1647/2016 GOVIND RATHI & ANR Represented by: Mr. Shubham Gupta, Mr.Praween Gupta, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus NATIONAL CRIMES BUREAU ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. P.C. Aggarwal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1... Petitioners Govind Rathi and Basant Rathi seek bail in complaint case titled as NCB Vs. Puran Chand & Ors.. The above-noted complaint was lodged after a team of NCB DZU seized 5.6 Kg of hashish from Courier company ISE Courier Pvt. Ltd. Joshi Road, Karol Bagh, run by the two petitioners pursuant to an information received. As per the input, one Ashok Lamba was apprehended at Nepal who was trying to send charas/hashish from Kathmandu to India by courier parcels. From the search of the courier parcels sent from Kathmandu, it was found that in the cover pages of the religious diaries sent, hashish was concealed. A total quantity of 5.60...
Musa Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : January 12th, 2017 CRL.A. 864/2002 MUSA SINGH Advocates Through: Mr.Krishan Kumar and Mr.S.P. Nangia, ..... Appellant versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub-Inspector Jasmer Singh, Police Station Jahangir Puri, Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.JUDGMENT Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 25.02.2002 1. passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi convicting the appellant for the offence punishable under Sectionof Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as I.P.C.) and under Section 25/of Arms Act, and order on sentence dated 25.02.2002, whereby the appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years for the offence under Section 397 IPC; to under rigorous imprisonment for seven years for the offence under Section 392 of IPC with fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of pa...
- ‹ Prev
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- Next ›
- Last »