Delhi Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shubham Sharma vs.guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
$~7 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 145/2016 Judgment delivered on:13. 01.2017 SHUBHAM SHARMA versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Vijay Singh and Mr Sanjay Singh Mr Vaibhav Kalra : JUDGMENT1301.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks a mandamus to the respondent for allocation of institution of his preference (i.e. University School of Information and Communication and Technology in course of Information Technology (Dual)) as per merit.2. It is contended that the petitioner applied for registration for admission in B.Tech/ M.Tech Dual Degree on 26.02.2015. Based on the rank of the petitioner, the petitioner was allocated seat in Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Technology (Electronics and W.P.(C) No.145 /2016 Page 1 of 13 Communication Engineering) on 22.07.2015. It is contended...
Ravula Kumaru Swamy vs.national Capital Territory of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :13. h January, 2017 + CRL.REV.P. 329/2015 RAVULA KUMARU SWAMY Through Mr.Ravindra S.Garia and Mr.C.P.Nautiyal, Advocates ........ Petitioner VERSUS NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for State SI Naresh Kumar, P.S.Kamla Market CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. Present revision petition under section 397 Cr.PC has been preferred by the petitioner to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 20.04.2015 in Sessions Case No.22/2015 by which charge for commission of various offences was framed by the Court below against him. Petition is contested by the respondent.3. I have heard learned counsels for parties and have examined the Trial Court Record. It is urged that the petitioner was not named either in the FIR or in the 164 Cr.PC statement. He has no relation whatsoever with Sudha; he is not her husband. Crl.Rev.P.329/2015 Page 1 of 2 4. On p...
Sanjeev Malhotra vs.the Branch Manager, Allahabad Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
$~10. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5914/2014 SANJEEV MALHOTRA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Mrinmoi Chatterjee, Advocate versus THE BRANCH MANAGER, ALLAHABAD BANK..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amitabh Krishan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER1301.2017 CM APPL. 45154/2016 (for condonation of delay in filing the restoration application) and CM APPL. 34866/2016 (for restoration) 1. The present application has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for restoration of the writ petition that was dismissed in default vide order dated 28.03.2016.2. Replies in opposition to these applications have been filed by the respondent. Counsel for the respondent states that the petitioner has not been able to explain the inordinate delay of 183 days in seeking restoration of the writ petition. He, however, submits that if the Court is inclined to allow these applications, the petitioner must be mulcted with costs.3. The Court finds merit in the sub...
Kiran and Anr vs.shantilal Bhagchand Kocheta Jain & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h January, 2017. CS(OS) 322/2016 & IA No.10549/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) KIRAN AND ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Manish Kaushik and Mr. Lovish Sharma, Advs. Versus SHANTILAL BHAGCHAND KOCHETA JAIN & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Varun Jain, Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Ms. Disha Vaish and Ms. Anisha Mathur, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The present suit relates to the election of the National President of the defendant No.4 Shri All India Shwetambar Stanakwasi Jain Conference, a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. The said election for the period of 2016-2018 was, in the meeting of the members of the National Working Committee of defendant No.4 held on 24th January, 2016, announced to the held on 22nd May, 2016 and in accordance with the Rules and Bye-Laws of the defendant No.4, an Election Committee comprising of a Chief Election O...
Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd vs.uoi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI #34 $~ * + W.P.(C) 312/2017 BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD Through ........ Petitioner Mr. Anupam Varma with Mr. Nikhil Sharma and Ms. Shreya Khanna, Advocates versus UOI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms. Meena Pathak, Advocate for R-1/UOI. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC (Civil) with Mr. Vinod Kumar Bhati, Advocate for R-2 to 6 and 11/GNCTD. Ms. Pratima Gupta, Advocate R-7/ DERC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN % CM APPLs. 1507-1508/2017 ORDER1301.2017 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 312/2017 By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner-BSES seeks a direction to the respondents to take steps, make arrangements and effect measures for expeditious creation/setting up of arrangements and necessary infrastructure for charging of E-Rickshaws plying in the petitioners area of supply in the NCT of Delhi. It is averred in the petition that the respondents have failed to put in place any mechanism and infrastr...
Yp Investments Private Limited vs.magnum Strips and Tubes Private Limi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order Delivered on:13. 01.2017 CO. APPL. (M) 154/2016 IN THE MATTER OF: YP INVESTMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED ...Applicant/Transferor Company AND MAGNUM STRIPS AND TUBES PRIVATE LIMITED Through: Mr. Jeevesh Nagrath and Ms. Monica Applicant /Transferee Company Manchanda, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present application has been filed jointly, under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 by YP Investments Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Transferor Company) and Magnum Strips and Tubes Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Transferee Company) in connection with the Scheme of Amalgamation (hereinafter referred to as the Scheme) between the Transferor Company and the Transferee Company. CO.APPL.(M) 154/2016 Page 1 of 1 2. The Transferor Company and the Transferee Company, shall hereinafter, ...
k.p. Singh vs.municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5864/2015 Reserved on:22. d November, 2016 Date of decision:13. h January, 2017 K.P. SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Praveen Kumar Singh and Mr. Rajeeve Gupta, Advocates. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS..... Respondent Through Ms. Biji Rajesh, Advocate for Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate for the respondent No.1. Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr. Abhishekh Ghai, Advocate. Mr. Puneet Jain, Advocate for the respondent No.5. Mr. R.A. Iyer, Advocate for Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC for the GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.The petitioner, K.P. Singh, in this writ petition impugns the order dated 30th March, 2015 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal, whereby TA No.384/2009 filed by him has been dismissed.2. The petitioner had joined services of the erstwhile Municipal Corporation of Delhi as an Assistant Engineer (Civil) in 1989. Upon WP(C) N...
Shaurya Raj Patnaik vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
40 $~ * + W.P.(C) 305/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SHAURYA RAJ PATNAIK ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Sachar, Advocate with Mr. Samarjit G. Patnaik and Mr. Rahul Tyagi, Advocates. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S. Guru Krishnakumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Mehra, Mr. Gautam Narayan, Mr. Santosh Kr. Tripathi, Mr. R.A. Iyer, Ms. R. Sneha and Mr. Tushar, Advocates for GNCT of Delhi. Ms. Akshita Manocha and Ms. Isha Garg for Mr.Dhanesh Relan with Ms.Isha Garg, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN The matter has been received today by way of typed supplementary ORDER1301.2017 % list. CM Appl. 1418/2017 (exemption) in W.P.(C) 305/2017 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 305/2017 & CM Appl. 1417/2017 Issue notice. Mr. Gautam Narayan, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Ms. Akshita Manocha, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.4. They pray fo...
Poddar Global Private Limited vs.servants of People Society & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
$~4 & 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: January 13, 2017 RFA(OS) 3/2017 PODDAR GLOBAL PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.V.K. Garg, Sr. Adv. instructed by Mr.Sunil Kumar, Adv. versus SERVANTS OF PEOPLE SOCIETY & ANR Represented by: None ........ RESPONDENTS * % + + FAO(OS) 379/2016 PODDAR GLOBAL PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.V.K. Garg, Sr. Adv. instructed by Mr.Sunil Kumar, Adv. versus Represented by: None SERVANTS OF PEOPLE SOCIETY & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(ORAL) ........ RESPONDENTS CM Nos.47546-47547/2016 in FAO(OS) 379/2016 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. FAO(OS) 379/2016 & RFA(OS) 3/2017 Page 1 of 7 CM Nos.1451-1452/2017 in RFA(OS) 3/2017 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. FAO(OS) 379/2016 & CM No.47545/2016 RFA(OS) 3/2017 & CM No.1450/2017 1. There is a delay of 62 days in filing FAO(OS) 379/2016. There is a delay of 98 days ...
Vinod Kumar Sharma vs.mithlesh Rani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. 01.2017 RC.REV. 286/2016 and CM Nos. 19344/2016 & 29896/2014 VINOD KUMAR SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Sudhir Naagar, Mr.Prashant and Mr.Vijay Kasana, Khatana Advocates. versus $~A-60 * % + MITHLESH RANI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Anshuman, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present petition filed under Section 25 B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act), the petitioner seeks to challenge the order dated 11.01.2016 passed by the Additional Rent Controller (ARC) passing an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act dismissing the application for leave to defend of the petitioner.2. The respondent/landlord filed the present eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act for eviction of the tenant from the property D-34 A, Amar Colony, Nangloi, Delhi which was given on tenancy to the petitioner. The property comp...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »