Delhi Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State vs.dr.gajraj Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2017
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI STATE Decided on:16. h January, 2017 CRL.REV.P. 9/2017 Represented by: Ms. Kamna Vohra, Additional ........ Petitioner Standing Counsel for State with SI Rekha, PS Mayur Vihar. versus DR.GAJRAJ SINGH Represented by: None. ..... Respondent CRL.REV.P. 10/2017 STATE Represented by: Ms. Kamna Vohra, Additional ........ Petitioner Standing Counsel for State with SI Rekha, PS Mayur Vihar. versus DR.GAJRAJ SINGH CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Represented by: None. ..... Respondent 1. FIR No.387/2015 under Section 354 IPC and Section 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short POCSO Act) was lodged on the complaint of the prosecutrix who stated that she was 12 years old and on 22nd June, 2015 at about 10.00 am she had gone to Homeopathy Dispensary at Block-26, Trilok Puri for her check up along Crl.Rev.P.9-10/2017 Page 1 of 5 with her mother. When her mother told the doctor that she was ...
Baleshwar Sharma vs.nageshwar Pandey
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h November, 2016 Date of Decision:13. h January, 2017 + BALESHWAR SHARMA ARB. P. 254/2015 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advocate. versus NAGESHWAR PANDEY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr.Santosh Mishra and Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Advocates. And + BALESHWAR SHARMA OMP (I) 193/2015 & IA14502016,OA762016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advocate. versus NAGESHWAR PANDEY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr.Santosh Mishra and Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT1301.2017 % 1. These are two petitions filed by Baleshwar Sharma against Nageshwar Pandey, the Respondent. Arb. P. No.254/2015 has been filed under Section ARB. P. 254/2015 & OMP (I) 193/2015 Page 1 of 20 11(5) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking the appointment of an Arbitrator to resolve the disputes between the parties arisin...
Modern Public School vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 17674/2004 13th January, 2017 MODERN PUBLIC SCHOOL Through: ........ Petitioner Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani, Mr. Samit Khosla Jain, Advocates. and Mr. Sachin GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Satyakam, ASC for GNCTD with Mr. Manoj Kumar, LA GNCTD Zone-9. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner/Modern Public School impugns the order of the Director of Education dated 14.10.2004, by which the Director of Education has directed the petitioner-school not to give effect to the recommendations of the Selection Committee and accepted by the Managing Committee of the petitioner-school appointing Mrs. Alka Kapur as the Principal of the petitioner-school. W.P.(C) No.17674/2004 Page 1 of 9 2. The date of decision of the Managing Comm...
State Bank of India vs.dutta & Dutta Films (India) Ltd. & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
$~11. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5031/2016 1. STATE BANK OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Bheem Sain Jain, Advocate versus DUTTA & DUTTA FILMS (INDIA) LTD. & ORS........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Bindu Das and Ms. Shradha Singh, Advocates for R-1 to R-3. Mr. Bijoy Kumar Pradhan, Advocate with Mr. Vineet Ranjan, Advocate for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % Appearance is entered by the counsel for the respondents No.1 to 3 ORDER1301.2017 and respondent No.4.2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner/Bank praying inter alia for issuing directions to the learned CMM, to pass appropriate orders for taking over the physical possession of the subject premises, i.e., DD-232, Western Marg, Saidulzab, M.B. Road, Mehrauli, New Delhi, from the respondents No.1 to 3 and for setting aside the order dated 04.12.2015, passed by the learned CMM in CC No.67/1/S.3. By the impugned order dated 04.12.2015, the learned CMM had rejected the prayer m...
Sushil Kumar vs.ranjit Singh Ahluwalia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
$~ * % + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. 01.2017 versus RC.REV. 525/2016 SUSHIL KUMAR RANJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA RC.REV. 526/2016 SURINDER KUMAR JAIN RANJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA versus RC.REV. 497/2016 SUNIL KUMAR & ANR versus RANJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA RC.REV. 502/2016 AJAY KUMAR versus RANJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA RC.REV. 503/2016 DWARKA NATH KOCHAR RANJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA versus RC.REV. 505/2016 SUNIL KUMAR versus RANJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent RC.REV. 525/2016 & CONNECTED Page 1 of 13 ........ Petitioner RC.REV. 506/2016 AMAR NATH & ANR RANJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA versus + + Present: Mr.Saurabh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner in RC.REV. RC.REV. 591/2016 NARESH GOSWAMI RANJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA ..... Respondent ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner versus 52...
Rukhsana Khatoon vs.javed Khan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : JANUARY13 2017. CRL.REV.P. 241/2015 + RUKHSANA KHATOON ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Laxman Mehta, Advocate along with petitioner present in person. VERSUS JAVED KHAN CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Md.Shahid Anwar, Advocate. ..... Respondent S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Present Revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 14.01.2015 by which the respondent was directed to pay maintenance @ `4,000/-p.m. The petition is contested by the respondent.2. During the course of arguments, it was agreed that respondent shall pay `6,000/- p.m. to the petitioner from today.3. In view of this, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the Revision petition and seeks its disposal in terms of settlement.4. The present petition stands disposed of with the direction that henceforth, the respondent shall pay maintenance @ `6,000/- p.m. to the petitioner. Cr...
Col M L Kaktikar and Anr vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 304/2017 & CMs No.1415-16/2017 1. COL M L KAKTIKAR AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through : Mr. P. Banerjee, Advocate versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Kanika Singh, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Abhishek Chhabra, Advocate for R-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 5.10.2016 passed by ORDER1301.2017 the learned Appellate Tribunal, MCD whreunder, an application preferred by them for seeking consolidation of Appeal No.3filed by them with Appeals No.6and 690/12, filed by the respondents No.2 and 3 in respect of a part of the ground floor, the first floor, second floor and the terrace above the second floor of premises bearing No.25, Aradhna Enclave, New Delhi, was dismissed.2. By the said order, the request of the petitioners for consolidation of their appeal for purposes of hearing has been rejected on the ground that Appeals No.6and 6filed ...
Union of India & Ors. Vs.savitri Hans
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 941/2016 Date of decision:13. h January, 2017 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Ms. Mrinalini Sen and Ms. Kritika Gupta, Advocates versus SAVITRI HANS Through Mr. M. K. Bhardwaj, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) The Union of India and its functionaries in this writ petition impugn order dated 28th April, 2015 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal whereby OA No.1624/2014 filed by Savitri Hans, respondent before us, has been allowed.2. Savitri Hans, an Inspector in the Income Tax Department, for promotion as an Income Tax Officer, is required to pass the Departmental Examination. Prior to 2009, the Departmental Examination had six papers, namely; Income Tax Law I [Paper I]., Income Tax Law II [Paper II), Book Keeping [Paper III]., Other Taxes [Paper IV]., Office Procedure (Paper V]. and Examin...
Vikram Dev Raj and Ors vs.lt. Governor of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI38$~ * + W.P.(C) 275/2017 VIKRAM DEV RAJ AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senoir Advocate with Ms. Manmeet Arora, Ms. Chand Chopra, Mr. Sarad K.Sunny and Ms. Sanam Tripathi, Advocates. versus LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S. Guru Krishnakumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Mehra, Mr. Gautam Narayan, Mr. Santosh Kr. Tripathi, Mr. R.A. Iyer, Ms. R. Sneha and Mr. Tushar, Advocates for GNCT of Delhi. Mr. Karan Singh Chandhiok, Advocate for applicant in CM Appl. No.1773/2017. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN ORDER1301.2017 The matter has been received today by way of typed supplementary % list. CM Appls. 1362/2017 (exemption) in W.P.(C) 275/2017 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. CM Appl. 1773/2017 (impleadment) in W.P.(C) 275/2017 Mr. Karan S. Chandhiok, learned counsel has filed the present impleadment application. Keeping in view the averments in the application, the same is allowed. The ...
Shaheed Udham Singh Smarak Co-Education Sec. School Through Its Chairm ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.10066/2016 13th January, 2017 SHAHEED UDHAM SINGH SMARAK CO-EDUCATION SEC. SCHOOL THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN ........ Petitioner Ms. Padma Priya, Advocate. Through: versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Ms. Niti Jain, Advocate for GNCTD. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.39889/2016 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. +W.P.(C) No.10066/2016 and C.M. No.39888/2016 (stay) 2. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner-school impugns the order passed by the Director of Education dated 8.7.2016. The order dated 8.7.2016 has been passed by the Director of Education in consequence of the order dated 4.3.2015 passed in W.P.(C) No.10066/2016 Page 1 of 7 W.P. (C) Nos.1706/2013 & 1865/2013 which was filed by the respond...
- ‹ Prev
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- Next ›
- Last »