Delhi Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Morepen Laboratories Ltd vs.m/s East West Pharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. 12.2016 Decided on:16. 01.2017 CS(COMM) 506/2016 & I.A.2589/2013 (u/O39R1& 2 CPC) M/S MOREPEN LABORATORIES LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Lokesh Chopra, Advocate versus M/S EAST WEST PHARMA ..... Defendant Through: Defendant is ex-parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT1 The case of the plaintiff in brief is that it has been manufacturing and marketing the medicines since the year 1995 under the brand name DOM DT under Licence No.MB/9and MNB966 which is used for suppressing the stomach infection, nausea and vomiting and that it is the registered trademark under Class 5 and valid up to 14.08.2019. The plaintiff has also given the sales figures as well as the expenditure incurred by it on the publicity, advertisement and marketing for the said trademark.2. It is submitted that in third week of January, 2013 the plaintiff company came to know through one of its sales team member that defendant CS(COMM) 506/2016...
Sulekh Aggarwal vs.shiv Astha Construction Company Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2017
$~ * 3 + 4 + 5 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 476/2012 & IA No.767/2015 SULEKH AGGARWAL Through: Mr. Vishwendra Verma with Mr. Yogesh Rathi, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus SHIV ASTHA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Manju Bhagat, Advocate. With ARB.P. 209/2015 & IA No.24037/2015 SULEKH AGGARWAL Through: Mr. Vishwendra Verma with Mr. Yogesh Rathi, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus SHIV ASTHA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Manju Bhagat, Advocate. With ARB.P. 210/2015 & IA No.24036/2015 SULEKH AGGARWAL Through: Mr. Vishwendra Verma with Mr. Yogesh Rathi, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus SHIV ASTHA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD ..... Respondent Arb.P. 476/2012 & connected matters Page 1 of 17 6 + 14 + 15 + Through: Ms. Manju Bhagat, Advocate. With ARB.P. 211/2015 & IA No.24035/2015 SULEKH AGGARWAL Through: Mr. Vishwendra Verma with Mr. Yogesh Rathi, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus SHIV ASTHA CONSTRUCTION COMPA...
Ad2c Holdings Private Limited vs.affle (India) Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:23. 11.2016 Judgment pronounced on:16.01.2017 CO.PET. 434/2016 IN THE MATTER OF:-"AD2C HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED Transferor Company No.1/Petitioner No.1 AND APPSTUDIOZ TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED Transferor Company No.2/Petitioner No.2 AND AD2C (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED Transferor Company No.3/Non-Petitioner AND AFFLE (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED Transferee Company/Non-Petitioner Through: Mr. P. Nagesh, Advocate with Ms. Suruchi Sejwar, Advocate Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for OL Ms. Assistant Companies Director Aparna Mudium, Registrar of for Regional CO.PET. 434/2016 Page 1 of 1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present petition has been filed jointly, under sections 391, 392 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by AD2C Holdings Private Limited (hereinafter referred as Transferor Company No.1/Petitioner No.1) and Appstudioz Technologies Private Limited (...
Harshvardhan Sarangpani Reddy vs.state of (Nct) Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2017
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment dated:16. h January, 2017 + CRL.M.C. 176/2017 HARSHVARDHAN SARANGPANI REDDY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Santosh K. Chauriha, Adv. with Mr.Meraj Kumar, Adv. versus STATE OF (NCT) DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Raghuvinder Varma, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I.S.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CRL.M.A.805/2017 Exemption granted, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 176/2017 & CRL.M.A.806/2017 1. This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing of Non Bailable Warrants & proceedings under Section Cr.P.C dated 06.12.2016 issued against the petitioner by Shri. Sumeet Anand, learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House, New Delhi, in CC No.33936/2016 titled M/s. KLJ Resources versus M/s. Aura Institutions Pvt. Ltd. 2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner could not appear before the Court below on medical grounds. He has submitted t...
Tara Kaur Sarang & Anr vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2017
$~49 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 9452/2015 & CM221162015 Judgment delivered on:16. 01.2017 TARA KAUR SARANG & ANR ........ Petitioners versus ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the... RESPONDENTS LAC/L&B : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi For the Respondent/DDA For the Respondent/UOI : Mr Ashish Tiwari : Mr Dhanesh Relan with Ms Akshita Manocha : Mr Rajesh Kumar with Ms Santwana and Mr Amit Kr. Dogra CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 By way of this writ petition the petitioners are seeking the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioners, consequently, seek a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated WP(C) 9452/...
Green Garden Association vs.government of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 732/2014 GREEN GARDEN ASSOCIATION ......... Petitioner Decided on:16. 01.2017 Through : Sh. Joydeep Bhattacharya and Sh. Vishnu. P.S. Langawat, Advocates. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Sh. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC and Ms. Deboshree Mukherjee, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioner, an association, claims to be aggrieved by a Notification No.F.3(393)/Policy/VAT/2013/1086-1096 dated 19.12.2013 and Notification No.F.3(393)/Policy/VAT/2013/1137-1147 dated 27.12.2013 issued by Commissioner, Value Added Tax, Commercial Tax Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi as illegal and void.2. The petitioner claims to be an association, whose members are mainly farm house owners who allow others to organize social and religious functions in their premises whereby they only permit use of the space (in the farm houses) and t...
Adobe Properties Private Limited vs.amp Motors Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:26. 10.2016 Judgment pronounced on:16. 01.2017 CO.APPL.(M) 150/2016 IN THE MATTER OF:-"ADOBE PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED Transferor/Applicant Company No.1 WITH AMP MOTORS PRIVATE LIMITED Transferee/Applicant Company No.2 Through: Mr. D.K. Malhotra & Mr. Rajesh Malhotra, Advocates for the Applicants. Kr. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present application has been filed jointly, under Sections 391 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by Adobe Properties Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company) and AMP Motors Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferee Company) seeking directions of this Court to dispense with the requirement of convening meetings of their equity shareholders, CO.APPL.(M)150/2016 Page 1 of 43 secured and unsecured creditors; to consider and approve, with or without modification, the proposed Scheme ...
Gangotri Enterprises Limited vs.ntpc Tamil Nadu Energy Company Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2017
$~38 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:16. 01.2017 + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 47/2016 GANGOTRI ENTERPRISES LIMITED ........ Petitioner Versus NTPC TAMIL NADU ENERGY COMPANY LIMITED ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr Subhiksh Vasudev, Mr Ishaan Madaan, Advocates. Mr Bharat Sangal, Advocate with Ms Anindita Deka, Advocate. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 Gangotri Enterprises Limited (hereafter 'GEL') has filed the present petition under Section 14 (2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter 'the Act'), inter alia, praying that an appropriate order terminating the mandate of Mr N. Sasikumar as the sole arbitrator be passed and further, an independent arbitrator be appointed to adjudicate the disputes between GEL and the respondent (hereafter 'NTECL'). Mr N. Sasikumar was appointed the sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes that had arisen between ...
Government of Nct of Delhi Public Works Department vs.m/s N N Buildcon ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2017
$~29 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 14/2017 GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ........ Petitioner Through: Ms Nandita Rao, ASC with Mr Palak Dewanand Ms Sanjay Rohmetra, Advocates. versus M/S N N BUILDCON PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr V. K. Jhanji, Senior Advocate with Mr Vineet Jhanji, Ms Jyoti Mendiretta, Mr Imran Moulaey and Ms Deeksha Ladi Kakkar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % VIBHU BAKHRU, J ORDER1601.2017 IA No.516/2017 1. petition is condoned. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in re-filing the 2. The application stands disposed of. IA No.515/2017 3.4. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CAV.40/2017 5. The learned counsel for the caveator/respondent has entered O.M.P. (COMM) 14/2017 Page 1 of 11 appearance. The caveat stands discharged. O.M.P. (COMM) 14/2017 & IA No.514/2017 6. The Government of NCT of Delhi (hereafter GNCTD) has filed the present peti...
Union of India & Anr. Vs.vinod Kumar Jain & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2017
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 194/2017 Date of decision:16. h January, 2017 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Saxena, Mr. R. Mukesh Kumar Mishra & Mr. Tiwari, Advocates versus VINOD KUMAR JAIN & ORS. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) The Union of India in this writ petition filed on 20.10.2016 impugns the order dated 3.7.2014 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal in OA No.2892/2012 titled Sujata Arora & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr. and OA No.2894/2012 titled Vinod Kumar Jain & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.2. There is substantial delay in filing the present writ petition. It appears that the petitioners were/are somewhat confused as to what is the exact nature of the relief granted to the respondents, vide the impugned order W.P. (C) 194/2017 Page 1 of 4 dated 3.7.2014.3. On the aspect that the respo...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »