Delhi Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Radhey Shyam Jha and Ors vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2017
$~11. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 687/2013 RADHEY SHYAM JHA AND ORS Through: Mr. Kuldeep Kumar, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for R-1. Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Advocate for R-2/DDA. Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Standing Counsel with Mr. Pranav Handa, Advocate for R-4/DUSIB. Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate for R-7. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER1601.2017 CM APPL. 34549/2016 (for rectification of the order dated 18.03.2014) 1. The present application has been filed by the petitioners for correction of the order dated 18.03.2014, limited to the extent of correctly describing the plot, subject matter of the petition.2. Notice was issued on this application on 04.11.2016, on which date counsels for the respondent No.1/UOI, respondent No.4/DUSIB and respondent No.7 were present. None was present on behalf of the respondent No.2/DDA on the last date of hearing.3. None of the resp...
Amit Verma vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2017
$~22 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:16. 01.2017 % + W.P.(C) 4381/2016 AMIT VERMA versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS: ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Mr Ravi Ranjan and Mr Mithilesh Kumar Mishra Ms Anubha Bhardwaj and Mr Dev P.Bhardwaj, Advocates for R-1/Union of India. Mr Vaibhav Kalra, Advocate for R-2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1601.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner, by the present petition, seeks a mandamus to the respondents to declare as factually and conceptually incorrect, the answer keys for question Nos.57, 100 and 107 of the Answer Key Booklet A published by respondent No.2, on 15.03.2016 for National Eligibility Test (NET) for Lectureship held on 20.12.2015 W.P.(C) No.4381 /2016 Page 1 of 7 and a further direction to respondent No.2 to declare the petitioner as qualified for the said examination.2. During the submis...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.babloo Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~35 * % + MAC.APP.120/2013 & CM No.1962/2013 Date of Decision:16. h January, 2017 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD...... Appellant Through: Mr. Shoumik Mazumdar, Adv. versus BABLOO KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Adv. for R1 to R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.9,44,900/- has been awarded to respondents No.1 to 3.2. The accident dated 24th October, 2011 resulted in the death of Kamla Devi. The deceased was aged 47 years and was survived by unmarried son, unmarried daughter and a married daughter who filed the claim petition before the Claims Tribunal. The deceased was working as a Safai Karamchari and it was claimed that she was earning Rs.7,500/- per month. The Claims Tribunal took the minimum wages of Rs.6,656/-, added 30% towards future prospects, deducted 1/3rd towards personal expenses and applied th...
Pradeep Kumar Mantri & Ors vs.state Thr. Food Inspector (Pfa)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:16. h January, 2017 CRL.M.C. 2274/2012 & Crl.M.A. 12133/2012 (stay) PRADEEP KUMAR MANTRI & ORS Represented by: Mr. D.K. Mathur, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus STATE THR. FOOD INSPECTOR (PFA) ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kr. Garg, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. In complaint case bearing No.135/2007 titled as Food Inspector, Department of PFA Vs. Shri Santokh Singh & Ors. Pradeep Kumar Mantri, Praveen Kumar Mantri, Santokh Singh, Sumitra Devi and M/s. Vijay Oil Mills, the petitioners herein were summoned for offence punishable under Section 7 read with Section 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (in short the PFA Act). In the complaint it was alleged that on 6th June, 2007 at 11.00 AM the Food Inspector purchased a sample of mustard oil from the premises of Babneet Store, B-471/D, Budh Nagar, Inderpuri where the food article was found stored for sale. The sample c...
M/S Allied Blenders and Distillers Pvt. Ltd. Vs.mr. Surya Rao Trading ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2017
$~35 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1227/2016 M/S ALLIED BLENDERS AND DISTILLERS PVT. LTD. Through: Ms Abhilasha Nautiyal and Ms Kanak Bose, Advocates. ..... Plaintiff versus MR. SURYA RAO TRADING AS LEO FOODS & BEVERAGES Through ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1601.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The plaintiff has filed the present suit inter alia seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark and copyright, passing off, dilution, unfair competition, delivery up, etc. against the defendant.2. On 21.12.2012, this court directed issuance of Summons in the present suit. By the same order, an ex parte ad interim injunction was granted and the defendant, M/s Leo Foods & Beverages, was restrained from manufacturing, selling or distributing any alcoholic beverage bearing the plaintiffs trademark/label Officers Choice or from using any other mark deceptively similar to the trademark/label Officers Choice. Further CS(CO...
Mr. Sisupalan and Anr. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.1742/2010 16th January, 2017 Mr. Sukhvinder Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioners MR. SISUPALAN AND ANR. Through: Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: Mr. Prasanta Verma, ........ RESPONDENTS standing counsel for R-1. Mr. Ravinder Aggarwal, Adv. for R- 2/UGC. Mr. Aditya Ranjan, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.19916/2016 (for restoration) and CM No.19917/2016 (for condonation of delay of 1306 days in filing the restoration application) Though there is a huge delay of 1306 days in filing these applications for restoration and condonation of delay, and though there is no ground for restoration, but since I have heard arguments on merits, these applications are allowed and the writ petition is restored to its original The applications stand disposed of. number. W.P.(C) No.1742/2010 Page 1 of 5 W.P.(C) No.1742/2010 1. By this writ petition unde...
Shri Raj Kumar Gaur vs.directorate of Education & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.6689/2003 16th January, 2017 SHRI RAJ KUMAR GAUR Through: ........ Petitioner Kunwar C.M.Khan and Ms. Ashma Choudhary, Advocates. DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Naushal Ahmed Khan, ASC for CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA R-1. To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner/Sh. Raj Kumar Gaur seeks the relief of being granted monetary benefits of the Assured Career Promotion Scheme (in short ACP Scheme) as applicable to schools in Delhi by virtue of the notification of the Directorate of Education dated 25.8.2003. By virtue of the ACP Scheme, given in the notification dated 25.8.2003, the benefit is to be granted with effect from 9.8.1999.2. As per the ACP Scheme, an employee gets benefit of a pay scale of a higher post although the person is not appointed to a higher post. W...
Harshvardhan Sarangpani Reddy vs.state of (Nct) Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2017
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment dated:16. h January, 2017 + CRL.M.C. 178/2017 HARSHVARDHAN SARANGPANI REDDY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Santosh K. Chauriha, Adv. with Mr.Meraj Kumar, Adv. versus STATE OF (NCT) DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Raghuvinder Varma, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I.S.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CRL.M.A.811/2017 Exemption granted, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 178/2017 & CRL.M.A.812/2017 1. This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing of Non Bailable Warrants & proceedings under Section Cr.P.C dated 06.12.2016 issued against the petitioner by Shri. Sumeet Anand, learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House, New Delhi, in CC No.33603/2016 titled M/s.KLJ Resources versus M/s. Aura Institutions Pvt. Ltd. 2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner could not appear before the Court below on medical grounds. He has submitted th...
Ideal Cghs Ltd. Vs.registrar Co-Operative Socities & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2017
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 326/2017 Through Mr. Raghav Kumar Tiwari, Advocate. versus ........ Petitioner Date of decision:16. h January, 2017 Through Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate. IDEAL CGHS LTD. REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCITIES & ANR..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.1539/2017 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 326/2017 Ideal Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd., in this writ petition, has challenged the orders 18th September, 2013 and 9th December, 2013, passed by the Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies directing grant of membership to Shanker Lal Gaur, the second respondent. The order dated 1st December, 2016 passed by the Financial Commissioner rejecting revision petition filed by the petitioner-Cooperative Society against the said direction is also challenged.2. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner-Cooperative Society, w...
State vs.madan Mohan & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2017
$~19 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P.No.174/2016 & CRL.M.A.No.4503/2016 + % Date of decision :16. h January, 2017 Through : Mr. Varun Goswami, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus STATE MADAN MOHAN & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Ajay Burman, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Sadhvi Gaur, Mr. Harshit Khurana and Mr. Karan Burman, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (Oral) GITA MITTAL, J.CRL.M.A.No.4503/2016 We have heard learned counsels for the parties. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the leave petition is condoned. The application is allowed. CRL.L.P.No.174/2016 1. We have heard Mr. Varun Goswami, ld. APP for the State on this criminal leave petition under Section 378(1) of the Cr.P.C. whereby the State has challenged the judgment dated 31st August, Crl. L.P.No.174/2016 Page 1 of 10 2015 passed by the ld. Additional Sessions Judge (West), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.5/2009 arising ...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »