Delhi Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dalip Yadav vs.sachida Nand Sharma & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2017
$~20 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA7772016 DALIP YADAV ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate with appellant in person. versus SACHIDA NAND SHARMA & ORS Through : Dr. V.P. Singh, Advocate with respondent in person. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER1701.2017 CM15002017 (by the appellant u/Sec.151 CPC for early hearing) 1. The present application has been filed by the appellant stating inter alia that during the pendency of the appeal, the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement as recorded in the Compromise Deed dated 26.12.2016 and therefore they seek advancement of the date of hearing.2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. CM No.1501/2017 is being taken up today itself for disposal.3. The application is disposed of. CM15012017 (by the appellant u/Sec.151 CPC) 1. The present application has been filed by the appellant stating inter alia that with the intervention of well wishers of the pa...
Union of India & Ors. Vs.saroj Mohan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2017
$~R-1 & 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P. (C) 8585/2004 Date of Judgment:17. h January, 2017 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.R.V. Sinha, Adv. with Mr.R.N. Singh and Mr.A.S. Singh, Advs. versus SAROJ MOHAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Satya Mitra Garg, Adv. with Ms.Manju Aggarwal, Adv. + W.P. (C) 782/2003 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.R.V. Sinha, Adv. with Mr.R.N. Singh and Mr.A.S. Singh, Advs. versus DR. A.K. KAPOOR ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Satya Mitra Garg, Adv. with Ms.Manju Aggarwal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Rule DB in W.P. (C) 782/2003 was issued on 21st February, 2005 and in W.P. (C) 8585/2004 was issued on 8th May, 2006.2. Arguments in both the matters have been heard together. Counsel for WP (C) 8585/2004 & WP (C) 782/2003 Page 1 of 12 the parties submit that both the writ petitions can be disposed of by a common order as the point of ...
The National Highways Authority of India vs.m/s. Jivanlal Joitaram Pat ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d December, 2016 Date of Decision:17. January, 2017 O.M.P. (COMM.) 201/2016 + THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Varma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashish Joshi, Mr. Sumit Gupta & Mr. Rohit Jain, Advocates. versus M/S. JIVANLAL JOITARAM PATEL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Harin P. Raval, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ritin Rai, Mr. Sidhartha Jha & Mr. Aabhas Kshetarpal, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % JUDGMENT1701.2017 1. The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) has filed this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) challenging an Award dated 24th March, 2011 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal (AT).2. The disputes between the parties arose out of an Agreement dated 17th November, 2004 whereby the work of Short-term Improvement and Routine Maintenance of Samakhiyali Gandhidham Section (from KM306to 362.160) of NH-8A and Toll Collection...
Bougainvillea Multiplex & Entertainment Center Pvt Ltd. Vs.india Touri ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 437/2016 BOUGAINVILLEA MULTIPLEX & ENTERTAINMENT CENTER PVT LTD. Through: Mr Akhil Sibal with Mr. Prantik Hazarika and Mr. Deepak Chawla, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus $~ * 5 + ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Sikri, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shweta Bharti, Mr. Deepank, Mr. Neelesh Sinha, Mr. Shijo George and Ms. Rashmi Gupta, Advocates. INDIA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % 1. This is a petition under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation ORDER1701.2017 Act, 1996 (Act) by Bougainvillea Multiplex & Entertainment Center Pvt. Ltd. (BMEC) seeking appointment of an Arbitrator in the disputes between the parties that have arisen out of a licence deed dated 1st March, 2013 executed by the India Tourism Development Corporation Limited (ITDC) in favour of BMEC permitting it to operate an international cuisine restaurant-cum-night club under the name and style of Stellar at Hotel Ashok, N...
Sumeet Narula vs.indian Bank & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through: Mr. S. Chakraborty, Advocate ........ Petitioner $~18. * + W.P.(C) 11638/2016 and CM APPL. 45861/2016 SUMEET NARULA INDIAN BANK & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Virender Kumar, R-2/Branch Manager for self and on behalf of R-1 and R-3. Mr. K.S. Parihar, Advocate with Mr. H.S. Parihar, Advocate for R-4/RBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER1701.2017 1. Counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of the present petition, his client and the respondents No.1 to 3/Bank have arrived at a settlement, whereafter a letter dated 16.01.2017 has been addressed to him by the respondent No.2/Bank, intimating him that the amount subject matter of the cheque for a sum of Rs.3,92,700/-, has been credited in his account. The letter dated 16.01.2017 is handed over by the counsel for the petitioner and is taken on record.2. On enquiring from the respondent No.2, Branch Manager of the respondent No.3/Bank as to the rea...
Sumer Singh & Anr vs.om Prakash Gupta & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2017
$~7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) 171/2016 & CM213152016 Judgment delivered on:17. 01.2017 SUMER SINGH & ANR versus OM PRAKASH GUPTA & ORS Advocate who appeared in this case: Appellants ... RESPONDENTS For the Appellants : Mr Anand Yadav CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 The present appeal is filed against the order dated 27.04.2016 passed by a learned Single Judge of this court. The present appellants who were defendant nos. 7&8 had contended before the learned Single Judge that the suit was a commercial dispute falling under Section 2(1)(c)(vii) of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015. This contention was rejected by the learned Single Judge and as such the suit was transferred to the District Court in view of the valuation of the suit being less than Rs. 2 Crore. FAO(OS)171/2016 Page 1 of 4 2. The learned counsel fo...
Dharam Vir & Ors. Vs.bgs International Public School & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2017
* + % DHARAM VIR & ORS. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.1359/2015 17th January, 2017 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Naveen Kumar Raheja, Advocate for P-6. versus BGS INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC SCHOOL & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Prarthana Samrath, Advocate for R-1. Ms. Isha Khanna, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition will be the writ petition only qua erstwhile petitioner nos. 2 to 7 in view of original petitioner No.1 being deleted from the array of parties vide order dated 11.2.2015.2. By this writ petition, the erstwhile petitioner Nos. 2 to 7 who are admittedly employees of respondent No.1/school, such persons working as Drivers, seek the relief of being granted monetary emoluments in terms of the Sixth Pay Commission report. The Sixth Pay Commission report has W.P.(C) No.1359/2015 Page 1 of 3 been made applicable to the schools in Delhi by vir...
Indra Vikas Samiti & Anr vs.state Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~35 * + W.P.(C) 31/2017 & C.M.No.193/2017 INDRA VIKAS SAMITI & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Ashok Bhasin, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Bhuvanesh Sehgal, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Udit Gupta, Advocate for R-1 & R-3 with Ms.A.Madhavi, Dy.Director, Social Welfare Department. Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Mr.Arun Birbal with Mr.Sanjay Singh, Advocates for DDA. Dr.Brahm Dutt with Mr.Vivek Kumar, Advocates. Mr.Ravinder Sethi, Sr.Advocate, Amicus Curiae with Mr.Puneet Sharma, Advocate. Date of Decision:17. h February,2017 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking quashing of the demolition order dated 23rd December, 2016 issued by respondent no.1 as well as for completing the process of regularisation of the petitioner-societies colonies in a time-bound manner. W.P.(C) No.31/2017 Page 1 of 12 2. Mr.Ashok Bhasin, learned senior counsel ...
South Asian Human Rights Documentation Centre & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h January, 2017 Decided on:17. h January, 2017 CRL.M.C. 4111/2011 & Crl.M.A. 501/2015 SOUTH ASIAN HUMAN RIGHTS DOCUMENTATION CENTRE & ORS ........ Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Jawahar Rana and Mr. versus Chinmay Kanojia, Advocates. STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Harbir Singh, PS R.K. Puram. Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh and Ms. Neha, Advocates for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. The respondent No.2 Suhas Chakma filed a complaint before the learned ACMM, Patiala House against the petitioners seeking summoning them for offences punishable under Sections 120- B/201/403/406/420/468/471/477-A/34 IPC.2. In the complaint, Suhas Chakma alleged that he was the Managing Trustee-cum-Director of Asian Centre for Human Rights (in short ACHR).... Petitioner No.1 South Asia Human Rights Documentation Centre (referred to the company hereinafter...
Bijay Madan Thr Power of Attorney Sonal Madan vs.punjab National Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2017
$~15 & 16. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5004/2016 and CM APPL. 20900/2016 BIJAY MADAN THR POWER OF ATTORNEY SONAL MADAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dattatray Vyas, Advocate with Ms. Sonal Madan in person. versus + W.P.(C) 5012/2016 and CM APPL. 20917/2016 PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK Through: Mr. S.N. Relan, Advocate with Mr. Abhinav Thareja, Advocate ..... Respondent 1. SONAL MADAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dattatray Vyas, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK Through: Mr. S.N. Relan, Advocate with Mr. Abhinav Thareja, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The petitioners herein (husband and wife) who are Directors of M/s ORDER1701.2017 Skan Cables & Wires Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the company) have filed these petitions praying inter alia for issuance of a writ of mandamus, for quashing the letter dated 15.01.2016, issued by the W.P.(C) 5004 & 5012//2016 Page 1 of 13 respondent/Bank, calling ...
- ‹ Prev
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- Next ›
- Last »