Delhi Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dilip Kumar Gupta vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : JANUARY18 2017 CRL.M.C. 2910/2016 & Crl.M.A.12488/2016 DILIP KUMAR GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr.Advocate, with Ms.V.Shukla, Advocates. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. SI Seema, PS Mahendra Park. ....... RESPONDENTS + S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.0758/2015 under Section 376 IPC registered at Police Station Mahendra Park, Charge Sheet dated 7.3.2016 and all the legal proceedings emanating from the said FIR and charge-sheet. Status report is on record.2. I have heard the learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State and have examined the file.3. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner urged that a false and vexatious case vide FIR No.758/2015 dated 1.9.2015 was lodged against the petitioner under Section 3...
National Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.r. Suneeta & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
$~R-24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: January 18, 2017 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate ..... Appellant + MAC.APP. 574/2008 Versus R. SUNEETA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.N. Prashar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL1 JUDGMENT Impugned Award of 5th July, 2008 grants compensation of `27,95,966/- with interest to respondents-claimants, i.e. legal heirs of Shri Rambhatla Laxman Rao, aged 32 years, who had died in a road accident on 18th June, 2005.2. Appellant-insurer as well as respondents-claimants are dissatisfied with the impugned Award, which has given rise to the instant appeal and the cross-objections filed by respondents-claimants. The factual background of this case already stands noted in the impugned Award and so, needs no reproduction. Suffice to note that deceased was working as Assistant Manager with M/s T.V. Today Network on contractual basis Page 1 of 5 MAC.APP.574/2008 and was earning...
National High Ways Authority of India vs.gammon Atlanta (Jv)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:18. 01.2017 FAO(OS) 7/2017 NATIONAL HIGH WAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Appellant versus ... Respondent GAMMON ATLANTA (JV) Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr Ramesh Kumar : Mr Sumit Goel with Ms Raveena Rai CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 This appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 15.11.2016 delivered by a learned Single Judge of this court in, inter alia, OMP992008. That was a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), wherein the respondent had impugned the award dated 05.10.2007 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal in a dispute between the parties arising out of a contract dated 20.12.2000 for the work of widening of lane and strengthening of FAO(OS) 7/2017 Page 1 of 13 existing 2 lane carriage-way of NH-5 in the State of...
Mrs. Sandhya Bhardwaj vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.8747/2005 18th January, 2017 MRS. SANDHYA BHARDWAJ Through: ........ Petitioner Mr. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rakesh Bhardwaj, Adv. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1.... Petitioner/Mrs. Sandhya Bhardwaj, by this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugns the orders dated 13.8.2004 and 14.12.2004 issued by the Director of Education and the consequent charge sheet dated 31.3.2005 issued by the respondent no.3/Managing Committee of respondent no.4/school, and by virtue of which orders and charge sheet the services of the petitioner as a teacher with the respondent no.4/school are sought to be dispensed with on the ground that when the petitioner first obtained appointment as a teacher with the respondent no.4/school in 1984, appointment was taken on the basis...
Bharat Hotels Ltd and Anr vs.new Delhi Municipal Council
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~30 * + W.P.(C) 484/2017 & CMs 2216-17/2017 BHARAT HOTELS LTD AND ANR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. P.V. Kapur, Senior Advocate, Mr. Saurabh Kirpal, Mrs. Sonail Jaitley, Mr. Jaiyesh Bakhshi, Ms. Sanya Kapoor, Mr. Sidhant Kapur, Ms. Ranjanan Jaitley, Advocates. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG, Mr. Arjun Mitra,Mr. Rajul Jain, Ms. Jaskaran Kaur, Ms. Adrija Thakur, Advocates with Mr. Alok Bhatnagar, Head Assistant. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER1801.2017 1. The petitioners are aggrieved by the provisional demands dated 1.12.2016 and 2.1.2017 raised on them by the respondent/NDMC towards licence fee for the months of December, 2016 and January, 2017.2. By the impugned bill dated 1.12.2016, the respondent/NDMC has provisionally demanded a sum of Rs.4,40,00,000/- from the petitioners towards licence fee stated to be payable for the month of December,2016 along with arrears, totalling t...
Arkendra Singh& Anr vs.uoi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
$~22 & 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment dated 18thJanuary, 2017 W.P.(C) No.1448/2007 AMRIT LAL UOI & ORS Through : Mr.Yogesh K. Jagia, Adv. versus ........ Petitioner Through : Ms.Archana Gaur, Adv. for UOI. Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv. for UPSC. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) No.1737/2007 ARKENDRA SINGH& ANR ........ Petitioners Through : Mr.Yogesh K. Jagia, Adv. versus Through : Ms.Archana Gaur, Adv. for UOI. Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv. for UPSC. ........ RESPONDENTS + UOI & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Common arguments have been addressed in both the writ petitions and common issue arises for our consideration. The petitioner in W.P. (C) 1448/2007 had filed OA4452005 while the petitioners in W.P. (C) 1737/2007 had filed OA7002005 before the Central Administrative Tribunal (briefly the Tribunal). Both the applications were decided by a common order dated 18.08.2005 by the Tribunal whereby both the W.P...
Geometric Limited Vs.3d Plm Software Solutions Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:14. 12.2016 Judgment Pronounced On:18. 01.2017 CO.PET. 991/2016 IN THE MATTER OF:-"GEOMETRIC LIMITED Non-Petitioner/Demerged/Transferor Company HCL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED Petitioner/Transferee No.1Company AND AND3 PLM SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS LIMITED Non-Petitioner/Transferee No.2 Company Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gyanendra Verma, Ms. Shikha Tandon and Ms. Saarapika Biswal, Advocates for petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for OL Ms. Aparna Mudium, Assistant Registrar of Companies for Regional Director (NR) CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present petition has been filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as Act) by HCL Technologies CO.PET9912016 Page 1 of 1 Limited (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner/Transferee No.1 Company), seeking sanction to the proposed scheme of Arrangement and Amalgamation (hereinafter referred ...
k.s.s. Petron Pvt. Ltd. Vs.gypsum Structural India Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 20/2017 K.S.S. PETRON PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr K.K. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr Vinod Wadhwa, Advocate. GYPSUM STRUCTURAL INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent versus Through: Dr. Anurag Kumar Agarwal and Mr. Umesh Mishra, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1801.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J IA.No.685/2017 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P. (COMM) 20/2017 & IA No.684/2017 2. K.S.S. Petron Private Limited (hereafter KPPL) has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning the arbitral award (hereafter the impugned award) dated 08.10.2016 passed by the sole arbitrator. Factual Context 3. M/s Gas Authority of India Limited (hereafter GAIL) awarded certain works relating to the project, Dhabol Bangalore Pipe Line (DBPL) O.M.P. (COMM) 20/2017 Page 1 of 11 for Pipeline Laying and Terminal Works (Spread-D) to KPPL...
National Capital Territory of Delhi & Anr. Vs.veenu Grover
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
$~17. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.11869/2015 Date of decision:18. h January, 2017 NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. D. Verma, Advocate. versus VEENU GROVER ..... Respondent Through Ms. Arati Mahajan Shedha, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The Government of NCT of Delhi (GNCTD, for short) and the Medical Superintendent, Janak Puri Super Speciality Hospital challenge grant of maternity benefit vide the order dated 14th February, 2014 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) whereby OA No.3843/2013, Veenu Grover versus GNCTD, has been allowed. Veenu Grover the respondent before us, it has been held, was entitled to maternity leave of 180 days, the period stipulated in Rule 43 of the Central Civil Service (Leave) Rules, 1972.2. The contention of the GNCTD is that the respondent be...
Ranbir Singh & Ors. Vs.ndmc & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.9543-53/2004 RANBIR SINGH & ORS. Through:17. h January, 2017 Pramod Kumar ........ Petitioners Sharma, Mr. Advocate. NDMC & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vikas Mathur, A.O. and Mr. K.L. Miglani, A.A.O. of respondent No.2/NSES. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the 11 petitioners.... Petitioners are employees of a school which is run by respondent No.2/Navyug School Education Society. Respondent No.2/Navyug School Society is managed by respondent No.1/New Delhi Municipal Council.... Petitioners by the writ petition besides pleading their entitlement of ACP scheme also pray for quashing of office order dated 10.12.2002 as per which out of the 11 petitioners 8 petitioners have already been granted the ACP benefits but at a lower pay scale than as being prayed by the petitioners. This impugned order dated 10.12....
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »