Delhi Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kent Ro Systems Ltd & Anr vs.amit Kotak & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h January, 2017. CS(COMM) 1655/2016 & IA No.15914/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) KENT RO SYSTEMS LTD & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Rajeshwari H. and Mr. Tahir A.J., Advs. Versus AMIT KOTAK & ORS ..... Defendants Through: D-1 in person. Mr. Nitin Sharma, Mr. Avijit Sharma and Mr. Dhavish Chitkara, Advs. for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 Though the report of service is awaited but the counsel for the plaintiffs has filed affidavit of service of both the defendants.2. One gentleman disclosing himself to be Mr. Amit Shabhulal Kotak appears and the counsel for the plaintiffs states that she identifies him as defendant No.1. The said Mr. Amit Shabhulal Kotak has also handed over his Driving Licence and a self attested photocopy of the same be kept by the Court Master on the file.3. The defendant No.1 states that he has no objection to the suit, insofar as for the relief of permanent injunction, being d...
Chemtura Chemicals India Private Limited vs.arysta Lifescience India L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:24. 11.2016 Judgment Pronounced On:18. 01.2017 CO.PET. 73/2016 IN THE MATTER OF:-"CHEMTURA CHEMICALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ... Petitioner/Transferor Company AND ARYSTA LIFESCIENCE INDIA LIMITED Non-Petitioner/Transferee Company Through: Mr. Rishi Sood, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mayank Goel, Advocate for the Official Liquidator. Ms. Aparna Mudium, Assistant Registrar of Companies for the Regional Director (NR). CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present petition under Sections 391, 392 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by Chemtura Chemicals India Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as CO.PET732016 Page 1 of 1 Petitioner/Transferor Company) for sanction to the proposed scheme of Arrangement (hereinafter referred to as the proposed scheme) between the... Petitioner/Transferor Company and Arysta Lifescience India Limited (...
Neeta Sarda & Ors vs.aditya Sarda & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
$~19 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS(C) 38/2017 & CM20762017 NEETA SARDA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jain, Advocate versus ADITYA SARDA & ORS Through : None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER1801.2017 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners stating inter alia that the respondents are in contempt of the order dated 24.11.2016.2. After addressing arguments for some time, counsel for petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the present petition, while reserving the right of the petitioners to seek their remedies against the respondents in the pending appeal, in accordance with law.3. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn, along with the pending application. JANUARY18 2017 sk HIMA KOHLI, J...
Santokh Singh & Anr vs.m/s Shagun Farm Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
$~33 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 1756/2011 SANTOKH SINGH & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. S.S. Johar & Ms. Eti Solanki, Advs. Versus M/S SHAGUN FARM PVT LTD ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar & Mr. Aditya Nayyar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER1801.2017 IA No.2702/2014 (of the defendant under Order VII Rule 11 CPC) 1. The two plaintiffs viz. Sh. Santokh Singh and Sh. Lalit Agarwal instituted this suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 28th December, 2006 of sale by defendant to the two plaintiffs of agricultural land ad-measuring 7 Bighas 19 Biswas in village Brijbasan, New Delhi and agricultural land measuring 4 Bighas 16 Biswas in village Bamnoli, New Delhi.2. The suit was entertained and summons thereof issued. The suit was not accompanied with any application for interim relief restraining the defendant from further transacting the property, as is customary in such suits.3. In this context, it may also be not...
Vijay Singh vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : January 18th, 2017 BAIL APPLN. 28/2017 VIJAY SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Pradeep Kumar and Ms.Kiran, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP with SI Jaibir, PS Alipur. AND + BAIL APPLN. 26/2017 VIJAY SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Pradeep Kumar and Ms.Kiran, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Mr.M.S. Oberoi, APP with Bijender, PS Swaroop Nagar. SI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI % Bail Appl. Nos.28/2017 & 26/2017 ORDER Page 1 of 11 P.S. TEJI, J.1. The present applications under Section 439 read with Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Cr. P.C.) have been filed by the petitioner for seeking regular bail in a FIR No.14/2016, under Sections 363/365/368/370/ 346/310/120- B/34 IPC, Police Station Alipur (Bail Appln. 28/2016) and in FIR No.50/2016, under Sections 363/367/368/372...
National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) vs.m/s Progressie - Mvr (J ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
$~30 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:18. 01.2017 FAO(OS) 16/2017 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA (NHAI) ....... Petitioner versus M/S PROGRESSIE - MVR (JV) ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr S. Nanda Kumar with Mr Parivesh Singh & Mr P. Sriniwasan. : Dr Amit George & Mr Swaroop George. For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) CM No.1911/2017 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM Nos.1912-1913/2017 These applications for condoning the delay in filing and re-filing have been heard. After considering the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the view that this is a fit case where delay ought to be condoned. The applications are allowed. FAO(OS) 16/2017 & CM No.1910/2017 (Stay) The present appeal has been preferred against the order dated FAO(OS) 16/2017 Page 1 of 5 17.06.2016 pas...
Pravin Kumar Kulshrestha vs.union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 425/2017 & CM No.1988/2017 Date of Decision :18. h January, 2017 1. PRAVIN KUMAR KULSHRESTHA Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Verma, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR Through: Mr. Abhay Prakash,CGSC ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR Pravin Kumar Kulshrestha, in this writ petition, impugns the order dated 2.8.2010, whereby his OA No.425/2015, praying for grant of full salary for the period 29.5.2013 to 19.1.2014 has been dismissed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal for short).2. The petitioner had earlier filed OA No.3990/2013, challenging his transfer vide Office Order No.1128/5/13 posting him as Superintending Engineer (TRG.3) in the Office of Chief Engineer (Trg.cum R&D), Delhi. WP(C) No.425/2017 Page 1 of 5 3. It appears that the said office was operating from Ghaziabad, which is in the State of Uttar Pradesh. T...
Satnam Singh Pabla vs.tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
+ % SATNAM SINGH PABLA IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.7094/2015 18th January, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocate versus TATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vikram Nandrajog, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) W.P.(C) No.7094/2015 and C.M. Appl. No.13008/2015 (for stay) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner/Sh. Satnam Singh Pabla impugns the order dated 8.7.2015 passed by the respondent for recommencing the enquiry proceedings. The petitioner also impugns the enquiry notice dated 13.7.2015. This order dated 8.7.2015 and the enquiry notice dated 13.7.2015 read as under:-"1. Order dated 8.7.2015 No.TPDDL/Discip/Head (HR)/15-Dated:08. 07/2015 TATA POWER DDL W.P.(C) No.7094/2015 ORDER Page 1 of 11 WHEREAS, THE Honble High Court of Delhi vide order dated 02.01.2014 passed in wri...
Pradeep Gupta vs.purn Chand Malhotra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:18. h January, 2017 FAO692016 PRADEEP GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.S.B. Pandey and Mr.Santosh Kumar, Advocates versus PURN CHAND MALHOTRA ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Awasthi, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant instituted a suit for recovery of Rs.3,94,754/- against the respondent under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure before the District Judge, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts in which the summons were issued to the respondent on 5th November, 2011.2. On 2nd September, 2013, the appellant failed to appear before the Trial Court whereupon the Trial Court dismissed the appellants suit in default.3. On 6th September, 2014, the appellant filed an application for restoration of the suit on the ground that there was a lapse on the part of the appellants counsel. It was submitted that the appellant enquired from his previous counsel on 1st September, 2...
Amrit Lal vs.uoi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
$~22 & 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment dated 18thJanuary, 2017 W.P.(C) No.1448/2007 AMRIT LAL UOI & ORS Through : Mr.Yogesh K. Jagia, Adv. versus ........ Petitioner Through : Ms.Archana Gaur, Adv. for UOI. Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv. for UPSC. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) No.1737/2007 ARKENDRA SINGH& ANR ........ Petitioners Through : Mr.Yogesh K. Jagia, Adv. versus Through : Ms.Archana Gaur, Adv. for UOI. Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv. for UPSC. ........ RESPONDENTS + UOI & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Common arguments have been addressed in both the writ petitions and common issue arises for our consideration. The petitioner in W.P. (C) 1448/2007 had filed OA4452005 while the petitioners in W.P. (C) 1737/2007 had filed OA7002005 before the Central Administrative Tribunal (briefly the Tribunal). Both the applications were decided by a common order dated 18.08.2005 by the Tribunal whereby both the W.P...
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›
- Last »