Delhi Court January 2017 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jan 19 2017

Government of Nct of Delhi vs.renu Aggarwal

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-19-2017

$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on :19. h January, 2017 LPA1562016 GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI ....Appellant Through : Mr. Biraja Mahapatra, Advocate. Versus RENU AGGARWAL .....Respondent Through : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Tyagi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.C. M. APPL. No.8835/2016 (Delay in filing) Heard. For the reasons stated in the application and in the interest of justice, delay in filing the present appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. LPA1562016 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the impugned order dated 12.08.2015 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.5493/2013 whereby the learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition of the respondent. The unsuccessful respondent in the writ petition is the appellant before us. LPA No.156/2016 Page 1 of 5 2. It is the case of the appellant that vide notification dated 21.03.2003 under Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2017

M/S Outdoor Associates vs.south Delhi Municipal Corp (Sdmc)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-19-2017

$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :11. 01.2017. Judgment delivered on :19. 01.2017 + W.P.(C) 5274/2016 M/S OUTDOOR ASSOCIATES ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rakesh Kr. Khanna, Sr. Adv with Mr. Anand Mishra, Ms. Mahima Rathi and Mr. H.S. Sachdeva, Advs. versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORP (SDMC) ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Mr. Govind Kumar and Mr. P.S. Jha, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The petitioner before this Court is a registered category C Outdoor Advertiser; he was registered in the year 2013. On 05.10.2015, the petitioner had made a request to the respondent/South Delhi Municipal Corporation along with all his requisite documents seeking permission to display advertisement through wall-wrap (of size 40X10-400 square feet) at building bearing No.302 (32), Satkar Building, 79-80, Nehru Place, New Delhi. W.P. (C) No.5274/2016 Page 1 of 12 2 On 02.12.2015, the petit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2017

Fashion and Style vs.commissioner Trade and Taxes and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-19-2017

2-110 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. 12.2016 (2 to87) 19.12.2017 (88 to95) 11.01.2017 (96 to102) 17.01.2017 (103 to110) Pronounced on:19. 01.2017 + W.P.(C) 10807/2016 M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 10856/2016 + W.P.(C) 10858/2016 + W.P.(C) 10859/2016 + W.P.(C) 10911/2016 + W.P.(C) 10947/2016 MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus DHANJAL ENGG. WORKS COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 11008/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)10807/2016 & connected cases...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2017

Pragati Construction Consultants vs.ministry of Railways Through Its G ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-19-2017

$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 155/2016 PRAGATI CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta and Mr. Sumit Bansal, Advocates versus MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER Through: Mr. ..... Respondent Jagjit Singh, Sr. Standing for Railways, Mr. Preet and Ms. Kiran Kaushik, Counsel Singh Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1901.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) praying that an arbitrator be appointed to adjudicate the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the works for construction of two lane ROB (Road Over Bridge) in lieu of level crossing No.69 (Spl) at KM12011-13 at Karnal on Delhi - Ambala Section (hereafter the works).2. The aforesaid works were awarded to the petitioner by a letter dated 24.02.2012 and the works were to be completed by 23.02.2013. The execution...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2017