Skip to content

Delhi Court January 2017 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jan 19 2017

Kc Art Glass vs.commissioner, Trade and Taxes and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-19-2017

2-110 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. 12.2016 (2 to87) 19.12.2017 (88 to95) 11.01.2017 (96 to102) 17.01.2017 (103 to110) Pronounced on:19. 01.2017 + W.P.(C) 10807/2016 M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 10856/2016 + W.P.(C) 10858/2016 + W.P.(C) 10859/2016 + W.P.(C) 10911/2016 + W.P.(C) 10947/2016 MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus DHANJAL ENGG. WORKS COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 11008/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)10807/2016 & connected cases...


Jan 19 2017

Commissioner of Income Tax Vi vs.m/s Virat Investment & Mercantile Co.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-19-2017

$~37&38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on 19.01.2017 + ITA Nos.709/2004, 37/2005 & 636/2004 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel in both appeals. versus M/S VIRAT INVESTMENT & MERCANTILE CO. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shashwat Bajpai with Mr. Sharad Agarwal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the parties submit that another appeal, i.e., ITA6362004 has to be heard together with these two appeals as the question of law framed is identical.2. With consent of counsel for the parties, that appeal - ITA6362004 was listed and heard for final disposal along with the other appeals.3. The following questions of law arise for consideration in these appeals: - Whether to deduction of interest/service charges paid on funds raised to subscribe to the assessee was entitled ITA Nos.709/2004, 37/2005 & 636/2004 Page 1 of 9...


Jan 19 2017

Nirwan Industries vs.commissioner of Trade and Taxes and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-19-2017

2-110 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. 12.2016 (2 to87) 19.12.2017 (88 to95) 11.01.2017 (96 to102) 17.01.2017 (103 to110) Pronounced on:19. 01.2017 + W.P.(C) 10807/2016 M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 10856/2016 + W.P.(C) 10858/2016 + W.P.(C) 10859/2016 + W.P.(C) 10911/2016 + W.P.(C) 10947/2016 MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus DHANJAL ENGG. WORKS COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 11008/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)10807/2016 & connected cases...


Jan 19 2017

Council of the Instt. Of Chartered Accountants of India vs.shri Gyan P ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-19-2017

$~1 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: January 19, 2017 CHAT.A.REF12014 COUNCIL OF THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Rakesh Agarwal & Mr.Pulkit Agarwal, Advocates. Versus SHRI GYAN PRAKASH AGARWAL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr.Prakash Chandra Srivastava, Advocate for respondent No.1 with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(ORAL) CM No.47376/2016 1.2. Heard learned counsel for parties. The issue raised is squarely covered in favour of petitioner as per the decision of a Division Bench of this Court, reported as 2011 (126) DRJ159 The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India & Ors vs. P. Rama Krishna & Anr.3. The transitional provision, being Section 21D, when on November 17, 2016 the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 was amended has been interpreted by the Division Bench. CHAT.A.REF12014 Page 1 of 5 4. Se...


Jan 19 2017

M/S. Indian Overseas Commercial Co. Vs.commissioner of Delhi Value Add ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-19-2017

2-110 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. 12.2016 (2 to87) 19.12.2017 (88 to95) 11.01.2017 (96 to102) 17.01.2017 (103 to110) Pronounced on:19. 01.2017 + W.P.(C) 10807/2016 M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 10856/2016 + W.P.(C) 10858/2016 + W.P.(C) 10859/2016 + W.P.(C) 10911/2016 + W.P.(C) 10947/2016 MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus DHANJAL ENGG. WORKS COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 11008/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)10807/2016 & connected cases...


Jan 19 2017

Mangla Enterprises vs.commissioner Trade and Taxes and Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-19-2017

2-110 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. 12.2016 (2 to87) 19.12.2017 (88 to95) 11.01.2017 (96 to102) 17.01.2017 (103 to110) Pronounced on:19. 01.2017 + W.P.(C) 10807/2016 M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 10856/2016 + W.P.(C) 10858/2016 + W.P.(C) 10859/2016 + W.P.(C) 10911/2016 + W.P.(C) 10947/2016 MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus DHANJAL ENGG. WORKS COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 11008/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)10807/2016 & connected cases...


Jan 19 2017

Airo Auto Industries vs.commissioner Trade and Taxes and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-19-2017

2-110 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. 12.2016 (2 to87) 19.12.2017 (88 to95) 11.01.2017 (96 to102) 17.01.2017 (103 to110) Pronounced on:19. 01.2017 + W.P.(C) 10807/2016 M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 10856/2016 + W.P.(C) 10858/2016 + W.P.(C) 10859/2016 + W.P.(C) 10911/2016 + W.P.(C) 10947/2016 MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus DHANJAL ENGG. WORKS COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 11008/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)10807/2016 & connected cases...


Jan 19 2017

Power Industries vs.commissioner of Delhi Value Added Tax and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-19-2017

2-110 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. 12.2016 (2 to87) 19.12.2017 (88 to95) 11.01.2017 (96 to102) 17.01.2017 (103 to110) Pronounced on:19. 01.2017 + W.P.(C) 10807/2016 M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 10856/2016 + W.P.(C) 10858/2016 + W.P.(C) 10859/2016 + W.P.(C) 10911/2016 + W.P.(C) 10947/2016 MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus DHANJAL ENGG. WORKS COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 11008/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)10807/2016 & connected cases...


Jan 19 2017

Delhi Transport Corporation & Ors vs.zile Singh

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-19-2017

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7043/2015 Date of decision:19. h January, 2017 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ORS ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Avnish Ahlawat and Ms. Latika Chaudhary, Advocates. versus ZILE SINGH Through Mr. U. Srivastava, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Delhi Transport Corporation, in this writ petition, impugns the order dated 10th February, 2015, passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal, for short), whereby OA No.883 of 2013 filed by Zile Singh, the respondent before us, has been allowed, holding that the respondent is entitled to pension under the pension scheme dated 27th November, 1992.2. In order to appreciate the reasoning given by the Tribunal, we would like to reproduce paragraphs 7 and 8 of the impugned order dated 10th February, 2015, which read as under:-"7. In my considered view, the aforesaid stand...


Jan 19 2017

Charanjeet Sons vs.commissioner of Vat and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-19-2017

2-110 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. 12.2016 (2 to87) 19.12.2017 (88 to95) 11.01.2017 (96 to102) 17.01.2017 (103 to110) Pronounced on:19. 01.2017 + W.P.(C) 10807/2016 M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 10856/2016 + W.P.(C) 10858/2016 + W.P.(C) 10859/2016 + W.P.(C) 10911/2016 + W.P.(C) 10947/2016 MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus DHANJAL ENGG. WORKS COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 11008/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)10807/2016 & connected cases...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial