Delhi Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ke Plugs and Wires vs.commissioner Trade and Taxes and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
2-110 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. 12.2016 (2 to87) 19.12.2017 (88 to95) 11.01.2017 (96 to102) 17.01.2017 (103 to110) Pronounced on:19. 01.2017 + W.P.(C) 10807/2016 M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 10856/2016 + W.P.(C) 10858/2016 + W.P.(C) 10859/2016 + W.P.(C) 10911/2016 + W.P.(C) 10947/2016 MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus DHANJAL ENGG. WORKS COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 11008/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)10807/2016 & connected cases...
Atul Kumra vs.oxbridge Associates Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
% + THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:20. 01.2017 FAO(OS) 19/2017 & CM Nos. 2210/2017 & 2211/2017 ATUL KUMRA versus OXBRIDGE ASSOCIATES LIMITED Advocates who appeared in this case:-"For the Appellant ... Appellant ... Respondent : Mr Ravi Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr Mehul Kumar, Mr Vivek Singh Bishnoi and Mr Yash Karan : Mr Jayant Mehta with Ms Ashmi Mohan and Ms Manisha Shukla For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This is an appeal against the order dated 21.12.2016 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in IA4872016 filed by the respondent/plaintiff. The said application was under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The suit filed by the respondent was one of recovery of Rs 1,55,46,586.62/- along with pendete lite and future interest. We need not go into the details of the factual background of the dispute...
Union of India & Anr. Vs.shri h.n.saini & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 485/2009 % Date of Judgment: January 20, 2017 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr. R.V. Sinha, Adv. with Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advs. versus SHRI H.N. SAINI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Vivek Kr. Tandon, Adv. with Mr. Manish Chauhan, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Rule DB was issued in this matter on 01.09.2010.2. With the consent of the parties the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. The respondent No.1 herein had approached the Central Administrative Tribunal (briefly the Tribunal) by filing OA972008, being aggrieved by denial of promotion to the post of Deputy Director (Administration.). The OA was allowed by the Tribunal by an order dated 20.08.2008, which has led to the filing of the present writ petition.4. The necessary facts to be noticed are that the respondent No.1 was at th...
Anil Kumar Sharma vs.guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + % ANIL KUMAR SHARMA W.P.(C) No.893/2016 20th January, 2017 ........ Petitioner Ms. Sayongita Yadav, Advocate. Through: versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS. Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kalra, Advocate for ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA respondent Nos.1 and 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition which is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is pending in this Court since 3.2.2016. No notice has yet been issued in the writ petition. On the first call before lunch, the counsel who appears for the petitioner sought accommodation on the ground that the main counsel is not available and will be available after lunch. Even on the second call after lunch, once again accommodation is prayed for, and which cannot be granted as it is opposed by the respondent nos. 1 and 2. Earlier orders passed in this writ petition show that repeated adjournme...
State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) vs.brijesh @ Rahul
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:20. h January, 2017 CRL.L.P. 33/2017 STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kr. Garg, APP with SI Shyam Sunder PS Sector-23, Dwarka. ........ Petitioner versus BRIJESH @ RAHUL ..... Respondent Represented by: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 1191/2017 For the reasons stated in the application 50 days delay in filing the leave to appeal petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. CRL.L.P. 33/2017 & Crl.M.A. 1073/2017 (for leave to appeal) 1. The respondent has been acquitted of the charge for offence punishable under Section 354D IPC in FIR No.372/2013 registered at PS Dwarka, Sector-23 vide the impugned judgment dated 24th August, 2016 challenging which the State prefers the present leave to appeal petition along with application seeking condonation of delay. CRL.L.P. 33/2017 Page 1 of 3 2. FIR was lodged on the written complaint of the prosecutrix who alleged that...
Sumitra Saini and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
$~ * % + Judgment Pronounced on 20th January, 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA6542016 SUMITRA SAINI & ANR Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal, Advocate. .....Appellants versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC with Mr. Rishabh Jetley, Advocate for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.1. The two appellants Smt. Sumitra Saini and Sh. Sandeep Saini filed the present Letters Patent Appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition bearing No.10369/2016 filed by the appellants titled Sumitra Saini and Anr. Vs. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors. for setting aside and quashing the impugned order dated 04.11.2016.2. The relevant background is that on 29.06.2010, demarcation was carried out by way of manual method concerning Khasra No.23and 23in Village Khikri, Delhi. The said demarcation was challenged by Sh. Satish Kaushik and Others in writ petition b...
Harish Relan vs.kaushal Kumari Relan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA7052016 and CM APPL. 33911/2016 (stay) Reserved on:16. 01.2017 Date of decision:19. 01.2017 Through: Mr. K.V. Balakrishnan, Advocate ..... Appellant versus IN THE MATTER OF: HARISH RELAN KAUSHAL KUMARI RELAN CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI Through: Mr. Vivek Singh, Advocate ..... Respondent HIMA KOHLI, J.1. A mother, called by any name, in any language, whether as Ma, Amma, Aayi, Mai, Ammee in India or as Madre, Mamma, Moer and Mana and several others dialects in foreign lands, is universally acknowledged as a symbol of pure and unconditional love for her offsprings. The sanskrit shloka from the Hindu Epic, Ramayana, uttered by Lord Ram, epitomizes the stature of a Mother in our country and treats her at par with the Almighty and the Mother Land in the following words : Janani Janma bhoomischa Swarga diapi Gariyasi (Translation : Mother and Motherland are greater than Heaven.) The debt that a child owes to his mother, who is not onl...
M/S Goel Oil Company vs.commissioner of Delhi Value Added Tax and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2017
2-110 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. 12.2016 (2 to87) 19.12.2017 (88 to95) 11.01.2017 (96 to102) 17.01.2017 (103 to110) Pronounced on:19. 01.2017 + W.P.(C) 10807/2016 M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 10856/2016 + W.P.(C) 10858/2016 + W.P.(C) 10859/2016 + W.P.(C) 10911/2016 + W.P.(C) 10947/2016 MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus DHANJAL ENGG. WORKS COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 11008/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)10807/2016 & connected cases...
Yash Sales vs.commissioner of Delhi Value Added Tax and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2017
2-110 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. 12.2016 (2 to87) 19.12.2017 (88 to95) 11.01.2017 (96 to102) 17.01.2017 (103 to110) Pronounced on:19. 01.2017 + W.P.(C) 10807/2016 M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 10856/2016 + W.P.(C) 10858/2016 + W.P.(C) 10859/2016 + W.P.(C) 10911/2016 + W.P.(C) 10947/2016 MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus DHANJAL ENGG. WORKS COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 11008/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)10807/2016 & connected cases...
Tirupati Metal Udyog (Since Closed) vs.commissioner of Trade and Taxes ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2017
2-110 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. 12.2016 (2 to87) 19.12.2017 (88 to95) 11.01.2017 (96 to102) 17.01.2017 (103 to110) Pronounced on:19. 01.2017 + W.P.(C) 10807/2016 M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 10856/2016 + W.P.(C) 10858/2016 + W.P.(C) 10859/2016 + W.P.(C) 10911/2016 + W.P.(C) 10947/2016 MANGLA ENTERPRISES COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus DHANJAL ENGG. WORKS COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 11008/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)10807/2016 & connected cases...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »