Delhi Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
All India Kabadi Mazdoor Mahasangh vs.naresh Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
$~1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS(C) 1129/2016 ALL INDIA KABADI MAZDOOR MAHASANGH ........ Petitioner Through : None. NARESH KUMAR versus ..... Respondent Through : Nr. Anil Grover, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The matter was passed over on the first call as none was present for ORDER2001.2017 * + 1. the petitioner. Same is the position even on the second call.2. On 13.1.2017, the application filed by counsel for the petitioner for discharge was allowed in view of the fact that a letter dated 2.1.2017 was dispatched by learned counsel for the petitioner to the petitioner seeking discharge and intimating it about the next date of hearing, i.e., today. Despite the same, none is present for the petitioner.3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present petition. The same is accordingly dismissed in default and for non- prosecution. JANUARY20 2017 sk HIMA KOHLI, J...
Krishna Continental Ltd vs.delhi Pollution Control Committee and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA4442016 Judgment pronounced on 20th January, 2017 KRISHNA CONTINENTAL LTD ..........Appellant Through : Ms. Jyotika Kalra with Mr. Hamant Kumar Yadav, Advocates. DELHI POLLUTION CONTROL COMMITTEE & ORS. Versus ......Respondents Through : Mr. Sanjeev Ralli, Advocate for DPCC with Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC, Mr. Vinod Tiwari, GP for respondent No.2/UOI. Mr. Alok Kumar & Mr. Abhishek Paruthi, Advocates for respondent No.3/CPCB. CORAM HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.1. The unsuccessful petitioner in W.P. (C) No.5114/2016 is the appellant before us.2. The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition by the order under appeal dated 02.06.2016 holding as under:"... This Court also finds that there is no prayer in the writ petition to strike down the revised fee schedule. Consequently, no relief with regard to the fee schedule can be granted to the petitioner. Page 1 of 6 LPA No.44...
Somerville School & Anr vs.delhi Development Authority & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
46 & 47 $~ * + W.P.(C) 408/2017 MOUNT CARMEL SCHOOL Through: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ........ Petitioner Mr. Romy Chacko, Advocate with Mr. Varun Mudgal and Mr. Ashish Yadav, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Dhanesh Relan, Advocate with Akshita Manocha and Ms. Isha Garg, Advocates for DDA. Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG and Mr. S. Guru Krishnakumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Mehra, Sr. Standing Counsel, Mr. Gautam Narayan, Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Assistant Standing Counsel, Mr. R.A. Iyer, Ms. R. Sneha and Mr. Tushar Sannu, Ms. Shruthi P. and Mr. S. Banerji, Advocates for GNCT of Delhi. Mr. Anil Arora, Legal Assistant, DoE. And + W.P.(C) 409/2017 SOMERVILLE SCHOOL & ANR Through: ........ Petitioners Mr. Romy Chacko, Advocate with Mr. Varun Mudgal and Mr. Ashish Yadav, Advocates. versus W.P.(C) 408/2017 & W.P.(C) 409/2017 Page 1 of 26 % DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Dhanesh Relan, Ad...
Verma Homes Pvt. Ltd. Vs.nimit Builders Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on:26. 10.2016 Order delivered on:20.01.2017 CO. APPL. (M) 149/2016 IN THE MATTER OF: VERMA HOMES PVT. LTD. ...Applicant/Transferor Company no.1 AND VERMA DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. ...Applicant/Transferor Company no.2 AND VERMA PROPTECH PVT. LTD. ...Applicant/Transferor Company no.3 AND RAMDOOT DESIGNS PVT. LTD. ...Applicant/Transferor Company no.4 AND RIA EXPORTS PVT. LTD. ...Applicant/Transferor Company no.5 AND CO.APPL.(M) 149/2016 Page 1 of 1 JK JEET CLOTHES PVT. LTD ...Applicant/Transferor Company no.6 AND JSR EXPORTS PVT. LTD. ...Applicant/Transferor Company no.7 AND NIJHAWAN CREATIONS PVT. LTD. ...Applicant/Transferor Company no.8 AND MAHABALI PARKS PVT. LTD. ...Applicant/Transferor Company no.9 AND SFI CONSULTING PVT. LTD. ...Applicant/Transferor Company no.10 AND ROYAL IT PARKS DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. ...Applicant/Transferor Company no.11 CO.APPL.(M) 149/2016 Page 2 of 2 NIMIT BUILDERS PVT. LTD. WITH ...Applicant Company no.12/Tra...
Malayan Banking Berhad vs.allahabad Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. 12.2016 Decided on:20. 01.2017 CS(OS) 745/2015 MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kanishk Ahuja, Advocate. ALLAHABAD BANK versus ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Sugam Seth, Advocate along with Ms. Renukha Iyer, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT I.A. 22985/2015 (application on behalf of defendant under Order 37 read with Section 151 CPC for leave to defend) 1. Vide this application the defendant (hereinafter called as AB) has sought the leave to defend the case.2. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) for the recovery of USD1505,267.81 equivalent to `11,00,04,972.03p. along with pendente lite and future interest at the rate of 12 % per annum from the date of institution of the present suit till its actual realization. CS(OS) 745/2015 Page 1 3. The brief facts of the case are that the plain...
Praveen Kumar Pandey vs.the Director of Education, Govt. Of n.c.t and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.9483/2015 & CM No.22253/2015 20th January, 2017 PRAVEEN KUMAR PANDEY Mr. Ranjit Sharma, Adv. ........ Petitioner Through: versus THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, GOVT. OF N.C.T AND ANR. Through: Mr. Sushil Kr. Tripathi, Adv. for R-2. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner/Sh. Praveen Kumar Pandey seeks the relief of quashing of the letter dated 24.6.2015 by the respondent no.1/Director of Education and the consequent letter dated 8.7.2015 of the respondent no.2/Satyawati Sood Arya Girls Senior Secondary School denying appointment to the petitioner for the post of Librarian with the respondent no.2/school. These letters dated 24.6.2015 and 8.7.2015 read as under:-"Letter dated 24.6.2015 OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION DISTRICT SOUTH EAST, DEFENCE ...
Kanti Bhai Damani vs.n.c.t. Of Delhi &Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:20. h January, 2017 CRL.M.C. 3817/2008 KANTI BHAI DAMANI Represented by: Mr. Rajesh Chhetri, Mr. Akash Tyagi, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus N.C.T. OF DELHI &ORS. ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Mr. N.K. Jha, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 10079/2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner/ applicant seeks leave to withdraw the application as he has already handed-over the keys of the flat at Keshav Puram to the respondent No.2. Application is dismissed as withdrawn. Crl.M.A. 6279/2012 (modification by R-2) 1. Crl.M.C. 3817/2008 was filed by the petitioner/ non-applicant seeking quashing of FIR No.83/2002 under Sections 498A/406 IPC registered at PS Shalimar Bagh on the complaint of respondent No.2/ applicant as the parties CRL.M.C. 3817/2008 Page 1 of 9 had settled the matter. This petition was taken up along with Crl.M.C. 3943...
Raj Pal vs.union of India Through Estate Officer
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :17. 01.2017. Judgment delivered on :20. 01.2017. + W.P.(C) 5671/2016 & C.M. No.24373/2016 RAJ PAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Mukesh Anand, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ESTATE OFFICER ..... Respondent Through Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC, .T.P.Singh and Mr. Sahaj Garg, Advocates for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The petitioner before this Court is Raj Pal. He is the owner of Government Quarter No.S-4/876, R.K. Puram, New Delhi. He is stated to be working as Assistant Compiler in the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. He was allotted the aforenoted accommodation by the Government of India. He is still occupying the said property. W.P. (C) No.5671/2016 Page 1 of 10 2 The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the learned District Judge dated 12.05.2016 which had endorsed the findings returned by the Estate Officer dated 17.07.2015 vide which the petitione...
Ram Niwas Singh vs.rajendra Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
$~21 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: January 20, 2017 RSA252017 RAM NIWAS SINGH Through: Mr.Ram Lal, Advocate ..... Appellant versus RAJENDRA SINGH & ORS Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT (Oral) CM No.2295/2017 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. RSA252017 1. This Regular Second appeal under Section 100 CPC is filed against the concurrent judgments of the Courts below i.e. of the trial Court dated 5th July, 2016 and of the First Appellate Court dated 28th November, 2016 whereby the suit of the respondents/plaintiffs have been decreed for possession under Order XII Rule 6 CPC in respect of the plot No.WZ-93(Now 934/1A) Basai Darapur, New Delhi-110015 as shown red in the site plan.2. Mr.Ram Lal, learned counsel for the appellant/tenant has submitted that the instant appeal raises substantial question of law for the following RSA No.25/2017 Page 1 of 5 reasons:-...
Tilak Rathore and Anr. Vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : January 20th, 2017 CRL.A. 422/2000 TILAK RATHORE AND ANR. Advocates. Through: Mr.Ajay Verma, Ms.Divya Chugh, ..... Appellants versus STATE Through: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S.TEJI, J.1. The instant appeal has been filed being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 05.07.2000 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi convicting the appellants for the offence punishable under Section 498-A/3of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as I.P.C.), and order on sentence dated 07.07.2000, whereby the appellant Tilak Rathore has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and fine of Rs.1,000/- for the offence under Section 498-A/34 of IPC and in default of payment to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. The appellant was also sentenced to undergo rigor...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »