Delhi Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chander Bhan vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~2. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITON (CIVIL) No.7324/2016 Date of decision:24. h January, 2017 CHANDER BHAN In person. versus UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Through Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay, CGSC, Mr. Arun Kumar Mishra & Mr. Arnav Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The petitioner- Chander Bhan appears in person. The petitioner impugns the order dated 3rd June, 2016 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal, for short), which allows the Review Application No.256/2015 filed by the Union of India, Ministry of External Affairs, recalling the earlier order dated 22nd July, 2015 which had partly allowed OA No.622/2014 filed by the petitioner.2. The respondents before us have produced the original record of the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) proceedings relating to the year 2008-09.3. In order to appreciate the controver...
Aditya Srivastava (Minor) Thr Natural Guardian Mother vs.central Board ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2017
* % + :1. 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on: January 23, 2017 LPA412017 ADITYA SRIVASTAVA (MINOR) THR NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER Through: Ms.Namita Roy, Adv. ..... Appellant Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Atul Kumar, Adv. for CBSE. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL Ms.G. ROHINI, CHIEF JUSTICE: JUDGMENT The appellant before us is the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.1242/2016. The said writ petition which was filed seeking a direction to the respondents to change the name of the petitioner from 'Randhir Srivastav' to 'Aditya Srivastav' in all the records maintained by the respondents and to issue a fresh mark-sheet and certificate of Class-X Examination passed by the petitioner in the year 2015 was dismissed by the learned Single Judge by the order under appeal dated 07.12.2016. Hence the present appeal.3. We have heard the learned counsel for both the parties.4. The appellant/writ peti...
Atul Dikshit vs.c.b.i.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : DECEMBER08 2016 DECIDED ON : JANUARY23 2017 CRL.M.C.4143/2016 & CRL.M.A.17270/2016 ATUL DIKSHIT ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr.Advocate, with Mr.Kumar Vaibhav, Mr.Vaibhav Sethi and Mr.Ramaditiya Tiwari, Advocates. versus C.B.I. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Ms.Rajdipa Behura, SPP with Ms.Garima Singh Yadav, Mr.Philomon Kant and Ms.Kriti Handa, Advocates. + S.P.GARG, J.1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner-Atul Dixit to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 14.10.2016 of learned Special Judge-03, CBI whereby the application filed under Section 155 of Customs Act was dismissed. The petition is contested by the respondent-CBI. Crl.M.C.4143/2016 Page 1 of 9 2. I have heard the learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and learned SPP for the respondent and have examined the file.3. Admitted position is that petitioner i...
Delhi Niwas Co-Op. G/H Society Ltd. Vs.sh. Surender Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2017
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 599/2017 Date of decision:23. d January, 2017 DELHI NIWAS CO-OP. G/H SOCIETY LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rohit Kumar Modi, Advocate. SH. SURENDER KUMAR & ORS versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Vikas Shokeen, Advocate for R- 3, Registrar, Cooperative Societies. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.2771/2017 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 599/2017 Delhi Niwas Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd., in this writ petition filed in January, 2017, impugns order dated 13th July, 2015 passed by the Delhi Cooperative Tribunal rejecting their appeal against Award dated 30th January, 2012. The writ petition, it is apparent, has been filed after about 18 months from the date of passing of the impugned order by the Delhi Cooperative Tribunal. No reason or ground for the aforesaid delay has been given in the writ petition.2. We also fi...
g.s.johar & Ors. Vs. Il&fs Trust Company Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on : January 17, 2017 Judgment Delivered on : January 23, 2017 EFA (OS) 4/2017 C&C CONSTRUCTIONS LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.P.V.Kapoor, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Manalisha Chaudhary, Advocate for A-1 versus IL&FS TRUST COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Moazzam Khan, Mr.Alipak Banerjee and Mr.Brijesh Kumar, Advocates EFA (OS) 5/2017 G.S.JOHAR & ORS. ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr.Rakesh Tikkoo, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Rashmeet Kaur, Advocate for A-1 and A-2 Mr.Anil Airi, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Romila Joshi, Advocate for A- 3 and A-4 Mr.Navin Kumar, Advocate for A-5 versus IL&FS TRUST COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Moazzam Khan, Mr.Alipak Banerjee and Mr.Brijesh Kumar, Advocates EFA (OS) Nos.4/2017, 5/2017 & 6/2017 Page 1 of 7 Judgment Reserved on...
Smt. b.mangla vs.the Director of Education & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) Nos. 7249/2002 & 8049/2009 1. W.P.(C) No.7249/2002 SMT. B.MANGLA23d January, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh and Mr. Suresh Chaudhary, Advocates. versus THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for R-1 and 2.2. W.P.(C) No.8049/2009 SMT. B.MANGLA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Advocate with Mr. Suresh Chaudhary, Advocate and Ms. Namrata Bharti, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. K.K. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Bakshi, Advocate and Mr. Gagandeep Chauhan, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Advocate for UGC. W.P.(C) Nos.7249/2002 & 8049/2009 Page 1 of 8 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) W.P.(C) No.7249/2002 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of th...
Shri Rajinder Aggarwal vs.shri Vinod Kakkar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2017
$~A-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % Date of decision:23. 01.2017 + CM(M) 1350/2013 & CM No.20067/2013 SHRI RAJINDER AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Sonali Malhotra and Mr.Amit Sanduja,Advocates versus SHRI VINOD KAKKAR & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr.Anurag Sharma, Advocate for Ms.Ruchira Gupta, Advocate for DJB/R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 1.10.2013 by which the preliminary issue framed regarding limitation was decided against the petitioner.2. The respondent/plaintiff has filed the present suit for declaration and mandatory injunction. As per the plaint the respondent has purchased 1/3rd undivided share each in the property except the shop on the ground floor bearing No.24, Patel Road, West Patel Nagar, New Delhi which property CM(M)1350/2013 Page 1 was purchased vide registered sale deed dated 18.11.2009...
Sh. Tule Ram Yadav & Anr. Vs.the Commissioner & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.13318-19/2005 23rd January, 2017 SH. TULE RAM YADAV & ANR. Through: versus THE COMMISSIONER & ORS. None. ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by two petitioners, Sh. Tule Ram Yadav being petitioner no.1 and Sh. Jailal Yadav being petitioner no.2.... Petitioners claim that their pay scales as per the 4th Pay Commission Report should have been fixed at Rs.1640-2900/- but the respondents have wrongly fixed their pay in the scale of Rs.1400-2600/-.2. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondents, respondents have specifically pleaded that pay scales of the petitioners W.P.(C) No.13318-Page 1 of 4 have been fixed not at Rs.1400-2600/- w.e.f 1.1.1986 as pleaded by the petitioners, but, pay scale of both the petitioners was fixed ...
Kusum Bala vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d January, 2017 CRL.REV.P. 79/2017 KUSUM BALA STATE & ORS. Represented by: Mr. Arun Sharma, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP ..... Respondent with SI Anukul, PS Subji Mandi. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 1239/2017 Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. Crl.M.A. 1240/2017 For the reasons stated in the application 20 days delay in filing the petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. CRL.REV.P. 79/2017 1. The complainant got lodged FIR No.314/2008 under Sections 354/452/5IPC pursuant to directions under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. After investigation a charge-sheet was filed and charge for offences punishable under Sections 452/3IPC was framed against the CRL.REV.P. 79/2017 Page 1 of 3 respondents. After recording the evidence of the prosecution, the learned Trial Court acquitted the respondents. The learned Trial Court noted that neither ...
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.ram Lal Khangar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2017
$~162 * % + MAC.APP. 148/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. d January, 2017 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD..... Appellant Through: Ms. Shanta Devi Raman, Advocate RAM LAL KHANGAR & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pratap Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.13,72,260/- has been awarded to respondents No.1 and 2.2. The accident dated 01st November, 2013 resulted in the death of Rajender. The deceased was aged 30 years at the time of the accident and was survived by his parents who filed the claim petition before the Claims Tribunal. The deceased was working as a labourer. It was claimed that the deceased was earning Rs.11,000/- per month. The Claims Tribunal took minimum wages of Rs.8,086/-, added 50% towards future prospects, deducted 50% towards his personal expenses and applied the multiplier of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »