Delhi Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashwani Sharma vs.kanta Sharma & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
% + 1. *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h January, 2017 CS(OS) No.551/2016 ASHWANI SHARMA Through: Mr. Sanjay Goswami, Adv. .... Plaintiff Versus KANTA SHARMA & ORS. .... Defendants Through: Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Mr. Eklavya Bahl and Mr. Pawan Agarwal, Advs. for D-1 to 3. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW The plaintiff instituted this suit pleading (i) that late Shri Diwan Chand Sharma, being the paternal grandfather of the plaintiff, was one of the migrants to India from what is now Pakistan and was entitled to rehabilitation; (ii) that after the partition of the country, the Government of India, in the year 1947, under a Defence Rehabilitation Scheme, set-up certain colonies for rehabilitation of the officers of Armed Forces, Navy and Air Force who had migrated to India on partition of the country and one such colony to be set-up was what is today known as Defence Colony, New Delhi; (iii) that as Shri Diwan Chand Sharma was also a Defence personnel...
Mukesh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 102/2013 Judgment reserved on:20. h January, 2017 Judgment pronounced on:24. h January, 2017 MUKESH Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Ms. Vani & Mr. Prasanna, Advocates. Versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. STATE Respondent + CRL.A. 401/2013 RAVINDER ..Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Ms. Vani & Mr. Prasanna Advocates. Versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. STATE NCT OF DELHI Respondent + CRL.A. 562/2013 VASU SHARMA @ BUNTY ..Appellant Through: Mr. Javed Alvi, Advocate. STATE NCT OF DELHI Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. Versus Crl. A. Nos.102, 401, 562 & 563/2013 Page 1 of 28 + CRL.A. 563/2013 PARVESH @ RIMPY ..Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Ms. Vani & Mr. Prasanna, Advocates. Versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. STATE NCT OF DELHI Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HONBLE M...
Shail Bala Chauhan vs.director of Education & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.8941/2005 24th January, 2017 SHAIL BALA CHAUHAN Ms. Sonia A. Menon, Adv. ........ Petitioner Through: versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil), GNCTD with Mr. Ramesh Chander, DEO Zone-IX for R-1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner/Smt. Shail Bala Chauhan, a person working as an Assistant Librarian with the respondent no.2/school when the writ petition was filed in the year 2005, seeks three reliefs. The first relief is that the petitioner should be taken as appointed not as a Library Assistant but as an Assistant Librarian when petitioner was first given appointment although the letter of appointment of the petitioner with the respondent no.2/school dated 20.5.1991 gives appointment to the petitioner as a Librar...
Bimla Devi vs.nissar Ahmed
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:24. h January, 2017 FAO1712013 & CM250182015 BIMLA DEVI ..... Appellants Through: Mr. R.N. Dubey, Advocate versus NISSAR AHMED ..... Respondent Through: Mr.G.M. Farooqui, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the order dated 1st March, 2013 whereby her application under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure for setting aside of the ex parte decree has been dismissed by the learned Trial Court.2. The respondent instituted a suit for recovery of Rs.8 lakh against the appellant on the ground that the appellant agreed to sell property bearing No.B-92, measuring 55 square yards, Gali No.6, Brahampuri, Delhi-110053 to the respondent for total consideration of Rs.9,80,000/- vide agreement to sell dated 12th February, 2007; the respondent paid Rs.4 lakh to the appellant as earnest money at the time of the agreement and the balance sale consideration was agreed to be...
Girnar Investment Limited vs.suvrat Trading Co. Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on:08.12.2016 Order delivered on:24.01.2017 CO. APPL. (M) 164/2016 IN THE MATTER OF: GIRNAR INVESTMENT LIMITED Applicant No.1/Transferor Company AND SUVRAT TRADING CO. LIMITED Applicant No.2/Transferee Company Through: Mr. Abhishek Rao, Mr. Shailesh Suman, Ms. Bhavya Bharti and Ms. Deepti Bhardwaj, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present is an application filed jointly under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), by Girnar Investment Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company) and Suvrat Trading Co. Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferee Company) in CO.APPL.(M) 164/2016 Page 1 of 1 connection with the proposed Scheme of Arrangement and Demerger (hereinafter referred to as proposed scheme).2. The Transferor Company and the Transferee Company are hereinafter collectively referred to as Applicant Companies.3. The registe...
Jagbir Singh & Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 9164/2014 & CM208552014 Judgment delivered on:24. 01.2017 JAGBIR SINGH & ORS.... Petitioners versus ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the... RESPONDENTS LAC For the Respondent DDA : Mr Manoj Joshi : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi : Mr Dhanesh Relan with Ms Isha Garg CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 By way of this writ petition the petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioners, consequently, seek a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated WP(C) 9164/2014 Page 1 of 3 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) and in r...
Chhotey Lal Paropkari vs.director of Education, Gnctd and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.7447/2006 CHHOTEY LAL PAROPKARI24h January, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. U.S. Chaudhary and Mr. Vipin Chaudhary, Advocates. versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, GNCTD AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Satyakam, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner/Chhotey Lal Paropkari seeks appointment to the post of Upper Division Clerk (UDC) with effect from 4.3.1979 along with all consequential benefits.... Petitioner claims that petitioner worked for five years as a Lower Division Clerk (LDC) before 4.3.1979 and since five years of his service were completed on 4.3.1979, petitioner deserved to be promoted as UDC with effect from 4.3.1979 with all consequential benefits including calculation of pension. W.P.(C) No.7447/2006 Page 1 of 6 2. It is seen that the pet...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - 11 vs.shri Dinesh Kumar Mathur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~13 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on:24.01.2017 ITA4362016 PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 11 Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Advocate. ..... Appellant Versus SHRI DINESH KUMAR MATHUR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kapil Goel and Mr. Mukul Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI S. RAVINDRA BHAT (Oral):-"1. The question of law urged in this appeal is as follows:"Did the Income Tax Tribunal (ITAT) fall into error in holding that it was open to the assessee to claim that payments made to a sister concern were not subject in the circumstances of the case?." to IDS under Section 194 (C) The assessee had, for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2008-09, 2. inter alia shown expenditure to the tune of about Rs.3,19,66,460/- which was paid to M/s. Aakriti Creation Pvt. Ltd. In the course of regular assessments, the assessee explained that the expenditure was incurred towards reimbursements of raw materials the cost of ITA...
Harinder Kaushik vs.union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~100 THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:24. 01.2017 + W.P.(C) 9629/2015 & CM228362015 HARINDER KAUSHIK ...... Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: versus ...... RESPONDENTS : Mr Amiet Andlay : Mr Nawal Kishore Jha : Ms Mrinalini Sen with Ms Kritika Gupta : Mr Siddharth Panda For the... Petitioner For the Respondent No.1 For the Respondent No.2 For the Respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. Mr Siddharth Panda has handed over the counter affidavit on behalf of the respondent No.3. The same is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit and reiterates the contents of the writ petition. W.P.(C) No.9629/2015 Page 1 of 4 2. By way of this writ petition the petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabil...
Consortium of Tenants Thr. Its Secretary vs.vinod Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. h January, 2017 $~40 * % + W.P.(C) 5443/2007 & CM44992013 CONSORTIUM OF TENANTS THR. ITS SECRETARY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Gulshan Chawla,Mr.Manish Verma, Advs. versus VINOD KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Latika Chaudhary, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has challenged the award dated 9th January, 2007 whereby the Industrial Tribunal has directed the petitioner to reinstate the respondent within two months.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner urged at the time of the hearing that the petitioner did not receive any notice from the Industrial Tribunal and therefore, could not contest the claim petition.3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the petitioner was proceeded ex parte by the Tribunal vide order dated 23rd June, 2005.4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order proceeding ex parte was passed without considering that no notice was ser...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »