Delhi Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
b.b. Dash vs.central Information Commission & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~48 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 624/2017 B.B. DASH Judgment delivered on:24. 01.2017 ........ Petitioner CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Aditya Singh with Mr. Raju Dalal, Advocates. : Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA None. : JUDGMENT2401.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.2874/2017 (exemption) W.P.(C) 624/2017 & CM No.2873/2017 (stay) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.1. The petitioner impugns order dated 22.11.2016, whereby, the CIC has held the petitioner CPIO liable for not providing the information to the respondents. It has been held that the petitioner has failed to provide information without any cogent reasons. Maximum W.P.(C) No.624/2017 Page 1 of 8 penalty, as prescribed, of Rs.25,000/- has been imposed on the petitioner.2. The respondent No.2 had filed an application under the Right to Information Act...
Kartari Devi vs.union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~90 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P. (C) 5687/2015 & CM No.10225/2015 Judgment delivered on:24. 01.2017 KARTARI DEVI versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Advocates who appeared in this case:-"For the... Petitioner For the Respondent/L&B/LAC : Mr Siddharth Panda For the Respondent/DDA : Mr N.S. Chechi Petitioner Respondents : Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal with Mr Hem Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 By way of this writ petition the petitioner is seeking the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner, consequently, seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) and in respect of which Award No.87/1980-81 dated 30.1...
Jindal Steel & Power Limited & Anr vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h January, 2017 % + W.P.(C) No.3398/2015 & CMs No.6071/2015 (for stay), 13006/2015 (of R-3&4 for modification / clarification of order dated 13th April, 2015), 28512/2015 (of R-4 for modification / clarification of order dated 13th April, 2015) & 3044/2016 (for impleadment) JINDAL STEEL & POWER LIMITED & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal and Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Sanjeev Kapoor, Mr. Aakash Bajaj, Ms. Anusha Nagrajan and Ms. Shruti Chaudhary, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula and Mr. Ajay Kalra, Advs. for UOI. Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with GP Capt. Karan Singh Bhati, Mr. Jaideep Singh and Mr. Amit Verma, Advs. for CIL & SECL. \AND + W.P.(C) No.886/2016 & CM No.3888/2016 (for stay) JINDAL STEEL & POWER LIMITED & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal and Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Sanjeev Kapoor, Mr. Aakash Bajaj, Ms. An...
Union of India vs.anita Devi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. h January, 2017 $~21 * % + W.P.(C) 4323/2016 & CM181682016 UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner ANITA DEVI Through: Ms. Sangita Rai, Adv. versus Through: Ms.Rachna Aggarwal, Adv. in ..... Respondent respondent along with person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has challenged the award of the Industrial Tribunal whereby learned Tribunal held that late Vinod Kumar be regularized in service as a mason from 11th December, 2006, the date when his juniors were regularized.2. Late Vinod Kumar was engaged by the petitioner as a mason on 1st July, 1986 and he worked with the petitioner till his death on 25th January, 2009. The deceased worked for 22 years, 6 months and 24 days. The claim of the deceased with respect to non-regularization was referred to the Industrial Tribunal vide order dated 15th February, 2012. The deceased claimed regularization from 1st July, 1986 or the date when his juniors...
Kusum Bansal & Anr vs.vishnu Kumar Gupta & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~20 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. 01.2017 FAO(OS) 300/2016 & CM388602016 KUSUM BANSAL & ANR versus VISHNU KUMAR GUPTA & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellants For the... RESPONDENTS For the Respondent no.1 ..... Appellants ........ RESPONDENTS : Mr A.K. Singla, Sr. Adv. with Mr Rahul Shukla : Mr Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr Rajender Agarwal : Mr Vijay Kr. Wadhwa CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 The present appeal has been filed by defendant nos. 1&2 being aggrieved by the order dated 16.09.2016 passed in CS(OS) 40/2016. The said suit was filed by the respondent nos. 1&2. By virtue of the impugned order dated 16.09.2016 issues have been framed and certain directions have been given with regard to the manner of conduct of the trial.2. Three points have been raised by the appellants. The first point is that the learned Single Judge could not h...
Ravinder vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 102/2013 Judgment reserved on:20. h January, 2017 Judgment pronounced on:24. h January, 2017 MUKESH Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Ms. Vani & Mr. Prasanna, Advocates. Versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. STATE Respondent + CRL.A. 401/2013 RAVINDER ..Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Ms. Vani & Mr. Prasanna Advocates. Versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. STATE NCT OF DELHI Respondent + CRL.A. 562/2013 VASU SHARMA @ BUNTY ..Appellant Through: Mr. Javed Alvi, Advocate. STATE NCT OF DELHI Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. Versus Crl. A. Nos.102, 401, 562 & 563/2013 Page 1 of 28 + CRL.A. 563/2013 PARVESH @ RIMPY ..Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Ms. Vani & Mr. Prasanna, Advocates. Versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. STATE NCT OF DELHI Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HONBLE M...
Rameshwar Singh Tanwar & Others vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~83 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 1442/2015 & CM No.2536/2015 Judgment delivered on:24. 01.2017 RAMESHWAR SINGH TANWAR & OTHERS ... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Advocates who appeared in this case:-"For the... Petitioners For the... RESPONDENTS For the Respondent/DDA : Mr S.K. Rout with Mr Pawan Kumar : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi for L&B/LAC : Mr Dhanesh Relan with Ms Isha Garg ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 The counter-affidavit handed over by Mr Yeeshu Jain on behalf of the respondent No.1 is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioners does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit and reiterates the contents of the writ petition.2. By way of this writ petition the petitioners are seeking the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land WP(C) 1442/2015 Page 1 of 4 Acquisition, Rehabilit...
Swati Aggarwal vs.the State & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :24. h JANUARY, 2017 SWATI AGGARWAL CRL.M.C. 305/2017 ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Gautam Das, Advocate. versus THE STATE & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP. ........ RESPONDENTS + S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) CRL.M.A.No.1368/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 305/2017 1. Present petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for cancellation of bail granted to respondent No.3 (in short Respondent) by an order dated 16.12.2016 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in case FIR No.371/2016 registered under Section 376 IPC at PS Sector-23, Dwarka.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have examined the file. Learned counsel for the petitioner urged that the Trial Court did not consider the gravity of the offence and granted anticipatory bail to the p...
Atal Goel & Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 2290/2016 & CM98562016 Judgment delivered on:24. 01.2017 ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ATAL GOEL & ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the Respondent UOI For the Respondent Nos. 2&4 For the Respondent DMRC : Mr D.V. Khatri : Mr Vivek Goyal : Mr Siddharth Panda : Mr Tarun Johri CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 The counter affidavit handed over by Mr Panda on behalf of respondent nos. 2&4 is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioners does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit and relies on the averments made in the writ petition. WP(C) 2290/2016 Page 1 of 3 2. By way of this writ petition the petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (herein...
Ex Sub Maj Prem Nath Soni vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. 01.2017 + W.P.(C) 7677/2013 EX SUB MAJ PREM NATH SONI ........ Petitioner Through: versus... Petitioner in person. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nitish Negi for Mr. Ankur Chibber, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA JUDGMENT INDIRA BANERJEE, J1 In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged an order dated 08/04/2013 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, dismissing the application being OA No.45/ 2012 filed by the petitioner, seeking a direction on the respondents to inter alia grant the petitioner Honorary Commission taking into consideration and properly awarding points to the petitioner, for his achievements, medals, etc, WP(C). 7677/2013 1 2. According to the petitioner, the petitioner was enrolled in the Army as Sepoy on 02.02.1980 and retired from service on 30.11.2012. The petitioner contends that by dint of his hard work and comme...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »