Delhi Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nafis Ahmad Siddiqui vs.union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~88 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P. (C) 5252/2015 & CM No.9503/2015 Judgment delivered on:24. 01.2017 NAFIS AHMAD SIDDIQUI versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Advocates who appeared in this case:-"For the... Petitioner For the Respondent/L&B/LAC : Mr Siddharth Panda For the Respondent/DDA : Mr Dhanesh Relan Petitioner Respondents : Mr Nafis Ahmad Siddiqui (in person) CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 By way of this writ petition the petitioner is seeking the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner, consequently, seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 WP(C) 5252/2015 Page 1 of 3 Act) and in respect of wh...
Sony India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.cit
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~59 & 60 * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. 01.2017 ITA132012 ITA142012 SONY INDIA PVT LTD versus CIT Through : Sh. Nageswar Rao and Sh. Purushottam Anand, Advocates, for appellants. Sh. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel with Sh. Deepak Anand, Jr. Standing Counsel. ..... Respondent ..... Appellant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. The following questions of law arise for consideration in both these cases:"(i) Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the appellant is not entitled to depreciation under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in respect of the balance written down value relating to Daru Hera unit, forming part of the block of assets?. (ii) Whether the appellant is entitled to depreciation in respect of the assets, which were part of the Daru Hera unit, even if the assets had not been put to use during the assessment year 2005-2006...
Sish Pal Singh vs.lt. Governor, Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~30 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 3818/2015 & CM68242015 Judgment delivered on:24. 01.2017 SISH PAL SINGH ........ Petitioner versus LT. GOVERNOR, NCT OF DELHI & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent DDA For the Respondent L&B/LAC: Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi : Mr Akhil Sachar : Mr Dhanesh Relan & Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 By way of this writ petition the petitioner is seeking the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner, consequently, seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated WP(C) 3818/2015 Page 1 of 3 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the ...
Salahuddin vs.gnct and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
* + % SALAHUDDIN IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.6024/2006 Through: None. versus 24th January, 2017 ........ Petitioner GNCT AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Gursharan Singh, Advocate for R-1 and 2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The memo of parties of this writ petition is as under:-"SALAHUDDIN S/o Shri Abdul Rasheed R/o B-139, Kabooter Market, Wellcome, Seelampur, Delhi 110053 1. Versus 1. Government of National Capital Territory Through Director of Education, Education Directorate Old Secretariat, Vidhan Sabha Marg New Delhi. Education Officer, Zone V, 2. W.P.(C) No.6024/2006 Page 1 of 4 3. District North-East, G.T. Road, Shahadra, Delhi. Government Boys Secondary School Parents Teachers Association Through its President The Principal Government Body Secondary School, Brahampuri, Delhi -110053 2. As per the writ petition, the petitioner claims to be appointed as an Urdu tea...
Parvesh @ Rimpy vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 102/2013 Judgment reserved on:20. h January, 2017 Judgment pronounced on:24. h January, 2017 MUKESH Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Ms. Vani & Mr. Prasanna, Advocates. Versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. STATE Respondent + CRL.A. 401/2013 RAVINDER ..Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Ms. Vani & Mr. Prasanna Advocates. Versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. STATE NCT OF DELHI Respondent + CRL.A. 562/2013 VASU SHARMA @ BUNTY ..Appellant Through: Mr. Javed Alvi, Advocate. STATE NCT OF DELHI Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. Versus Crl. A. Nos.102, 401, 562 & 563/2013 Page 1 of 28 + CRL.A. 563/2013 PARVESH @ RIMPY ..Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Ms. Vani & Mr. Prasanna, Advocates. Versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. STATE NCT OF DELHI Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HONBLE M...
Soma Devi vs.tej Prakash
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA4902016 SOMA DEVI TEJ PRAKASH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arvind Chaudhary, Advocate with appellant in person. versus Through: Mr. P.D. Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER2401.2017 CM No.26367/2016 (for condonation of delay of 202 days in re-filing the appeal) 1. This application has been filed by the appellant praying inter alia for condonation of delay of 202 days in re-filing the accompanying appeal.2.3. Pleadings are complete. A reply in opposition to the application has been filed by the respondent. However, Mr. Gupta, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the respondent fairly states that if the Court is inclined to allow the present application for the reasons stated therein, which are rather vague, then the respondent may be restituted with costs imposed on the appellant.4. No doubt, the explanation sought to be offered in paras 2 and 3 of the ...
New India Assurance Co Ltd. Vs.om Wati & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~11 to 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: January 24, 2017 (i) + MAC.APP. 251/2014 (ii) + MAC.APP. 252/2014 (iii) + MAC.APP. 253/2014 (iv) + MAC.APP. 254/2014 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate versus (i) & (ii) KHAYALI RAM CHATURVEDI & ORS (iii) (iv) OM WATI & ORS KAMLESH DEVI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for respondents-claimants (except in MAC. APP.254/2014) Ms. Jyoti Rajouriam, Advocate for respondents-claimants (in MAC. APP.254/2014) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) JUDGMENT Impugned Award of 10th December, 2013 grants compensation of `11,37,600/- with interest @ 9% per annum to Khayali Ram on Mac.App.251 to 254 of 2014 Page 1 of 8 account of death of his wife-Gayatri Chaturvedi aged 50 years and compensation of `68,205/- with interest on account of injuries suffered by him in a road accident on 10th May, 2010. Compensation of `6,72,040/- with interest has been a...
Simla Devi & Ors vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~102 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 10551/2015 & CM266622015 Judgment delivered on:24. 01.2017 SIMLA DEVI & ORS versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioners For the Respondent DDA For the Respondent L&B/LAC : Mr M.P. Bhargava : Mr Himanshu- Rewatkar for Mr Sushil Dutt Salwan : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 The counter affidavit handed over by Mr Yeeshu Jain on behalf of respondent No.5 is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioners does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit and relies on the averments made in the writ petition. WP(C) 10551/2015 Page 1 of 3 2. By way of this writ petition the petitioners seeking the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement ...
National Highways Authority of India vs.hindustan Construction Co. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA OMP No.260 of 2015 Reserved on: December 03, 2016 Date of decision: January 24, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.. Rajiv Kapoor & Mr.. Srikant Sharma, Advocates versus HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, ..... Respondent Senior Advocate with Ms. Malavika Lal, Mr.. Karan Luthra & Ms. Aakashi Lodha, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR % 1. The challenge in this petition by the National Highways Authority of J U D G M E NT2401.2017 India (NHAI) under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) is to an Award dated 29th November, 2014 as well as its corrected version dated 15th December, 2014 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal (AT) by a 2:1 majority in the disputes between NHAI and the Respondent, Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. (HCC).2. The background facts are that an Agreement dated 29th January, 2004 was entered into between the parties whereby the work of ...
The Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation-2 vs.zte Corpor ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI PRONOUNCED ON:24. 01.2017 RESERVED ON:16. 01.2017 ITA9042016, ITA9052016, CM APPL.46510/2016 ITA9062016, CM APPL.46511/2016 ITA9072016, CM APPL.46512/2016 ITA9082016, CM APPL.46513/2016 ITA9092016, CM APPL.46515/2016 versus ..... Appellant THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-2 ZTE CORPORATION Appearance: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Puneet Rai, Jr. Standing Counsel, on behalf of Revenue, in all the appeals. Mr. Deepak Chopra with Mr. Harpreet Singh Ajmani and Mr. Rohan Khare, Advocates for the assessees in all the appeals. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ..... Respondent S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. In these appeals, the following questions of law arise for consideration: - (i) Are the ITATs findings with respect to interpretation of Article 12 (3) of the Indo-China Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement light of (DTAA), the in ITA-904-909/2016 Page 1 of 21 (ii) Ex...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »