Delhi Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjeev Solanki vs.delhi Development Authority & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~84 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 1999/2015 & CM No.3577/2015 Judgment delivered on:24. 01.2017 SANJEEV SOLANKI Petitioner versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent/L&B/LAC : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi For the Respondent/DDA : Mr J.V. Rana : Mr Himanshu Bajaj, ASC with Ms Sakshi Agrawal CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 The counter-affidavit handed over by Mr Yeeshu Jain on behalf of the respondent No.2 is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit as he reiterates the contents of the writ petition.2. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the...
New India Assurance Co Ltd. Vs.kamlesh Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~11 to 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: January 24, 2017 (i) + MAC.APP. 251/2014 (ii) + MAC.APP. 252/2014 (iii) + MAC.APP. 253/2014 (iv) + MAC.APP. 254/2014 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate versus (i) & (ii) KHAYALI RAM CHATURVEDI & ORS (iii) (iv) OM WATI & ORS KAMLESH DEVI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for respondents-claimants (except in MAC. APP.254/2014) Ms. Jyoti Rajouriam, Advocate for respondents-claimants (in MAC. APP.254/2014) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) JUDGMENT Impugned Award of 10th December, 2013 grants compensation of `11,37,600/- with interest @ 9% per annum to Khayali Ram on Mac.App.251 to 254 of 2014 Page 1 of 8 account of death of his wife-Gayatri Chaturvedi aged 50 years and compensation of `68,205/- with interest on account of injuries suffered by him in a road accident on 10th May, 2010. Compensation of `6,72,040/- with interest has been a...
Jindal Steel & Power Limited & Anr vs.ministry of Labour and Employmen ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h January, 2017 % + W.P.(C) No.3398/2015 & CMs No.6071/2015 (for stay), 13006/2015 (of R-3&4 for modification / clarification of order dated 13th April, 2015), 28512/2015 (of R-4 for modification / clarification of order dated 13th April, 2015) & 3044/2016 (for impleadment) JINDAL STEEL & POWER LIMITED & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal and Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Sanjeev Kapoor, Mr. Aakash Bajaj, Ms. Anusha Nagrajan and Ms. Shruti Chaudhary, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula and Mr. Ajay Kalra, Advs. for UOI. Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with GP Capt. Karan Singh Bhati, Mr. Jaideep Singh and Mr. Amit Verma, Advs. for CIL & SECL. \AND + W.P.(C) No.886/2016 & CM No.3888/2016 (for stay) JINDAL STEEL & POWER LIMITED & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal and Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Sanjeev Kapoor, Mr. Aakash Bajaj, Ms. An...
Jagan Singh vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. 01.2017 % + WP(C) No.3164/2015 & CM56322015 JAGAN SINGH versus ....... Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent L&B For the Respondent DDA For the Respondent UOI : : : : Ms Richa Oberoi Mr Siddharth Panda Mr Pawan Mathur Mr Jitendra Kumar Tripathi CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act), which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding, which is the subject- matter of the present petition, ought to be deemed to have lapsed in view of the Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.2. The number of the ...
Vasu Sharma @ Bunty vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 102/2013 Judgment reserved on:20. h January, 2017 Judgment pronounced on:24. h January, 2017 MUKESH Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Ms. Vani & Mr. Prasanna, Advocates. Versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. STATE Respondent + CRL.A. 401/2013 RAVINDER ..Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Ms. Vani & Mr. Prasanna Advocates. Versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. STATE NCT OF DELHI Respondent + CRL.A. 562/2013 VASU SHARMA @ BUNTY ..Appellant Through: Mr. Javed Alvi, Advocate. STATE NCT OF DELHI Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. Versus Crl. A. Nos.102, 401, 562 & 563/2013 Page 1 of 28 + CRL.A. 563/2013 PARVESH @ RIMPY ..Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Ms. Vani & Mr. Prasanna, Advocates. Versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. STATE NCT OF DELHI Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HONBLE M...
Kartari Devi & Others vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~87 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. 01.2017 % + WP(C) No.4456/2015 & CM80782015 KARTARI DEVI & OTHERS versus ... Petitioners UNION OF INDIA & ORS ... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case:-"For the... Petitioners For the Respondent/UoI For the Respondent L&B/LAC : Mr Siddharth Panda For the Respondent DDA : Mr N.S. Chechi : Mr Vivekanand Mishra with Mr Rishabh Sahu : Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal with Mr Hem Kumar CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act), which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding, which is the subject- matter of the present petition, ought to be deemed to have lapsed in view of the Sectio...
New India Assurance Co Ltd. Vs.khayali Ram Chaturvedi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~11 to 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: January 24, 2017 (i) + MAC.APP. 251/2014 (ii) + MAC.APP. 252/2014 (iii) + MAC.APP. 253/2014 (iv) + MAC.APP. 254/2014 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate versus (i) & (ii) KHAYALI RAM CHATURVEDI & ORS (iii) (iv) OM WATI & ORS KAMLESH DEVI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for respondents-claimants (except in MAC. APP.254/2014) Ms. Jyoti Rajouriam, Advocate for respondents-claimants (in MAC. APP.254/2014) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) JUDGMENT Impugned Award of 10th December, 2013 grants compensation of `11,37,600/- with interest @ 9% per annum to Khayali Ram on Mac.App.251 to 254 of 2014 Page 1 of 8 account of death of his wife-Gayatri Chaturvedi aged 50 years and compensation of `68,205/- with interest on account of injuries suffered by him in a road accident on 10th May, 2010. Compensation of `6,72,040/- with interest has been a...
Pradeep Singh Chouhan and Ors vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~107 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 3224/2016 Judgment delivered on:24. 01.2017 PRADEEP SINGH CHOUHAN AND ORS versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ....... Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the Respondent L&B/LAC For the Respondent DDA : Ms Meenu Handa : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi : Ms Natasha Thakur CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) in respect of which Award No.69/1982-83 was made in 1982, inter alia, in respect of the W....
Ala Financial Advisors Private Limited vs.mair Securities Private Limi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order Reserved On:16. 11.2016 Order Delivered On:24. 01.2017 CO. APPL. (M) 130/2016 IN THE MATTER OF:-"ALA FINANCIAL ADVISORS PRIVATE LIMITED .Applicant/Transferor Company AND MAIR SECURITIES PRIVATE LIMITED ....Applicant/ Transferee Company Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Garg, Advocate for the Applicants. CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present application has been filed jointly, under Sections 391 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 by ALA Financial Advisors Private limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company) and Mair Securities Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferee Company), seeking directions of this Court to dispense with the requirement of convening the meetings of the equity shareholders, secured CO. APPL. (M) 130/2016 Page 1 of 1 creditors and unsecured creditors of the Transferor Company and...
M/S Tanima International vs.subhash Arora & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
$~20. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA862017 M/S TANIMA INTERNATIONAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Raj Kumar Rajput, Advocate with appellant in person. versus SUBHASH ARORA & ANR Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER2401.2017 CM APPL. 3011/2017 (exemption) Subject to the appellant filing the certified/typed/legible copies of the documents annexed with the appeal within four weeks, the application is allowed and disposed of. RFA862017 and CM APPL. 3010/2017 (stay) 1. The appellant/defendant is aggrieved by the judgment on admission pronounced by the learned trial court on an application filed by the respondents/plaintiffs under Order XII Rule 6 CPC in a suit for eviction, arrears of rent, mesne profits etc.2. Under the impugned judgment dated 05.11.2016, a decree of eviction in respect of the suit premises has been passed in favour of the RFA862017 Page 1 of 2 respondents/plaintiffs and against the appellant/defendant, who has be...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »