Delhi Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ntpc Limited vs.hindustan Construction Company Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI OMP6262014 & I.A.10812/2014 NTPC LIMITED Reserved on: December 17, 2016 Date of decision: January 25, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.. Tushar Mehta, ASG (Sr.) with Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath, Mr. Rajat Nair, Mr. Onkar Nath and Mr. Saurabh Kumar Tuteja, Advocates. $~ * + versus HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rishi Agrawala and Ms. Malavika Lal, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR % 1. By this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, J U D G M E NT2501.2017 1996 (the Act), the... Petitioner NTPC Ltd. (NTPC) seeks to challenge the Award and the order dated 29th September, 2013 and 25th January 2014, respectively passed by the Arbitral Tribunal (AT) in the disputes between NTPC and the Respondent, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. (HCC). Background 2. A contract dated 17th November, 2006 for the setting up of 600 MW OMP6262014 Page 1 of 26 (4x150 MW...
Mrs. Usha Rajput vs.principal, c.l. Bhalla Daya Nand Model School & Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.3560/2007 25th January, 2017 MRS. USHA RAJPUT ........ Petitioner None. Through: versus PRINCIPAL, C.L. BHALLA DAYA NAND MODEL SCHOOL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner impugns the letter dated 9.5.2006 issued by respondent nos.1 and 2/C.L. Bhalla Daya Nand Model School whereby the petitioner was directed to obtain Nursery Teachers Training (NTT) certificate/B.Ed. from a recognized institute within two years from the date of issuance of letter dated 9.5.2006.2. The petitioner as per the writ petition pleads that she was appointed in the year 1984 as a nursery teacher when the petitioner had W.P.(C) No.3560/2007 Page 1 of 6 shown all her relevant documents and hence was granted appointment as a nursery teacher.... Petitioner...
Sunita vs.amar Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
$~21 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUNITA Date of Decision: January 25, 2017 RSA2072016 Through: Mr.Abdul Sattar, Advocate ..... Appellant AMAR SINGH versus Through: Mr.Nitin Sharma, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT (Oral) RSA2072016 & CM No.3147/2017 1. The challenge by means of this Regular Second Appeal is to the concurrent judgments dated 26th September, 2005 passed by the learned Trial Court and dated 26th April, 2016 passed by the First Appellate Court by which the civil suit No.287/filed by the appellant/plaintiff seeking possession of property bearing Plot No.537 in Khasra No.1601, situated at Sangam Vihar, Gali No.12, Block G, New Delhi, measuring 150 sq. yds. has been dismissed.2. The appellant/plaintiff is claiming her ownership in respect of the above plot on the basis of documents i.e. unregistered General Power of Attorney Ex.PW-1/1, Agreement to Sell Ex.PW1/2, Affidavit Ex.PWand Receipt Ex.PW-executed in her favou...
Prakash vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. 1.2017 W.P.(C) 6680/2016 PRAKASH ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dev P Bhardwaj, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA INDIRA BANERJEE, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged a letter dated 10.5.2016, issued by the respondent No.2 to the petitioner, whereby the candidature of the petitioner for the post of an Assistant Commandant in the CISF (Central Industrial Security Force) has been cancelled. WPC. 6680/2016 1 2. Pursuant to an advertisement dated 06.07.2013, floated by the respondents in the Employment News, the petitioner applied for recruitment to the post of Assistant Commandant (Group-A) in the Central Armed Police Forces, hereinafter referred to as the CAPF.3. In the application, which was submitted online, the petitioner duly disclosed the fa...
V.k.sharma & Anr. Vs.nemo
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : January 25, 2017 CO.APP. 1/2017 V.K SHARMA AND ANR ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr.Deepak Khosla, Advocate. NEMO versus Represented by: Mr.Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for ..... Respondent Official Liquidator. Ms.Swati Setia, Advocate for Reserve Bank of India. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The appellant is aggrieved by the fact that concerning an application for public examination of the persons named in the application the learned Single Judge has issued notice to the persons concerned applying the principle of natural justice audi alteram partem.2. Learned counsel for the Official Liquidator does not dispute the position that the Serious Fraud Investigating Office, under the Union Government has submitted reports concerning land of the company in liquidation in the State of Andhra Pradesh and also by the Income Tax department.3. The appellant may not ...
Banarsi Singh vs.bses Rajdhani Power Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
$~24 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 611/2017 & CM No.2787/2017 Judgment delivered on:25. 01.2017 BANARSI SINGH ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent versus BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr. Rajesh Rai, Adv.. Mr. Puneeth K. G., Adv. and Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Advocate for BSES-RPL. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2501.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner has filed the present petition seeking a mandamus to the respondent to provide electricity connection to the petitioner at premises No.RZ-N-246/3, Second Floor, Back Side, Raj Nagar-II, Palam Colony, New Delhi 110045.2. It is submitted that the petitioner is in possession of the property as tenant under Mr. Sanjay Gupta. It is contended that there is a dispute between Mr. Sanjay Gupta on the one side and Ms. Surbhi Gupta and Ms. Angoori Devi on the other, with regard to the W.P.(C) No.611/2017 Page 1 of 4 owners...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-Xviii vs.praveen Saxena
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA372016 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XVIII ..... Appellant Through : Sh. Ashok. K. Manchanda, Sr. Standing Counsel. Decided on:25. 01.2017 versus PRAVEEN SAXENA ..... Respondent Through : Sh. Ajay Wadhwa and Sh. Sameep Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) The Revenue claims to be aggrieved by the order of the Income Tax 1. Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) whereby it dismissed its appeal. The ITAT affirmed the order of CIT(A) who had directed that the disallowance of `70 lakhs paid by the assessee respondent as a condition pursuant to the order of this Court dated 01.02.2007 was liable as an expense and that it was covered by Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereafter the 1961 Act]..2. The assessee is engaged in the business of import and export of commodities, including edible oil, through a proprietory concern, i.e. M/s. Nova Internat...
M/S Honda Car India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.chandar Pal Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: January 25, 2017 + CM(M) 699/2016 & C.M.Nos. 25915/2016 & 25917/2016 M/S HONDA CAR INDIA PVT LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jagdev Singh & Mr. A. Mishra, Advocates Versus CHANDAR PAL SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. G.P. Thareja & Mr. Satyam Thareja, Advocates for respondents No.1, 2 & 4 Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL1 JUDGMENT... Petitioner is aggrieved by its impleadment by respondents- claimants.2. Respondent No.3 is served through her father-in-law but none has appeared on her behalf. She is accordingly set ex parte.3. Respondent No.5- owner is unserved with the report vacated. Since the impugned order is on the application of respondent-claimant therefore, notice to respondent No.5 is dispensed with. C.M.(M) 699/2016 Page 1 4. Impugned order of 4th December, 2015 directs impleadment of petitioner in the capacity of manufacturer of the ve...
Smt. Swaran Lata vs.rashtrapati Bhavan, Kalyan Kendra and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.11899/2006 SMT. SWARAN LATA24h January, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: None. versus RASHTRAPATI BHAVAN, KALYAN KENDRA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner/Smt. Swaran Lata challenges the letter of termination of her services dated 1.5.2006 issued by the respondent No.1/Rashtrapati Bhavan, Kalyan Kendra.2.... Petitioner claims that the she was appointed as a teacher by the respondent No.1 and worked without any break from 17.7.1990 to 1.5.2006 and hence her termination from services is illegal. W.P.(C) No.11899/2006 Page 1 of 3 3. Respondent No.1 has filed a counter affidavit and stated that respondent No.1 is a private organization which was established on 10.8.1971 by the then President Sh. V.V. Giri for social upliftment of ...
Smartvalue Ventures Private Limited vs.smart Global Corporate Holding ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on:23.11.2016 Order delivered on:24.01.2017 CO. APPL. (M) 159/2016 IN THE MATTER OF: SMARTVALUE VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED Applicant/Transferor Company No.1 AND PROSPECTIVE INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED ... Applicant/Transferor Company No.2 WITH SMART GLOBAL CORPORATE HOLDING PRIVATE LIMITED . Applicant/Transferee Company Through: Mr. Saurabh Kaila, Mr. Hemant Sharma & Mr. Palash Agarwal, Advocates for Applicant Companies. CO.APPL.(M) 159/2016 Page 1 of 9 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present application has been filed jointly, under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), by SmartValue Ventures Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company No.1), Prospective Infrastructures Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company No.2) and Smart Global Corporate Holding Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transfere...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »