Delhi Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd vs.macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
$ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h January, 2017 Pronounced on:25th January, 2017 CS(COMM) 631/2016 INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Niyati Kohli, Mr. Karan Luthra, Ms. Aayushi S. Khazanchi and Mr. Saurabh Seth, Advocates versus MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Rajeshwari H., Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER IA66042016 (u/O. 39 R. 1 & 2 CPC) 1. a This civil suit (commercial) seeking permanent injunction against the defendant from infringement of its registered trademark GABAPIN and against passing off products as though that are the products of the plaintiff by using phonetically / visually similar mark GABAMIN was instituted in May 2016 impleading two defendants. On the application of the plaintiff (IA7052017) invoking order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) allowed by order dated 18.01.2017, the name of t...
Cit vs.lufthansa German Airlines
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
* + + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA6272016 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES versus Reserved on:22. 12.2016 Pronounced on:25. 01.2017 ..... Appellant ..... Respondent ITA6102004 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL..... Appellant LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES ..... Respondent versus ITA3372005 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX DELHI LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent ITA10172006 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION ..... Appellant LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES versus ..... Respondent ITA10242006 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES ..... Respondent versus ..... Appellant ITA10262006 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES ..... Respondent versus ..... Appellant ITA10312006 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION ITA62716 and connected cases Page 1 + + + + + + + LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent ITA12412006 DIRECTOR OF INCOME...
t.m. Sampath vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
$~53 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 727/2017 T.M. SAMPATH versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: Date of decision:25. h January, 2017 In person. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.The petitioner-T.M. Sampath, in this writ petition, has challenged his Annual Performance Appraisal Report (APAR) grading for the period 1st April, 2013 to 30th March, 2014.2. This is the second round of litigation as the petitioners had earlier filed OA No.55/2015 which was disposed of by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) on 7th January, 2015 with a direction to the respondent authorities to decide the representation of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order.3. The Memorandum dated 13th March, 2015 rejected the petitioners W.P. (C) 727/2017 Page 1 of 8 representation for upgradation of his APAR grading recording as under:-"The Honble...
Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. Vs.deepak Cables (India) Limited ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
$~30 * + POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 6/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tushar Mehta, ASG with Ms. Manmeet versus Singh & Ms. Shreya Singhal, Advocates. DEEPAK CABLES (INDIA) LIMITED (DCIL) ..... Respondent Through: Dr. P.C. Markanda, Senior Advocate with CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR Mr. Rajesh Markanda, Advocate. % ORDER2501.2017 IA No.1055/2017 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 6/2017 & IA No.1054/2017 2. This is a joint application by both the... Petitioner and the... RESPONDENTS under Section 14(2) read with Section 15 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) which has been filed in peculiar circumstances. It is supported by the affidavits of the authorised representatives of both parties.3. Both the parties are involved in nine disputes concerning contracts executed in different regions of the country and these disputes have been referred for adjudication to d...
Bucon Engineers and Infrastructure Pvt Ltd vs.indraprastha Gas Ltd and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 681/2017 Judgment delivered on:25. 01.2017 BUCON ENGINEERS AND INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD ........ Petitioner versus INDRAPRASTHA GAS LTD AND ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : : ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Deepak Dhingra with Mr. Natwar Rai, Advocates. Ms. Sreoshi Chatterjee with Ms. Astha Gaur and Mr. S. Aggarwal, Advocates for respondent No.1. Ms. Purnima Maheshwari, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. JUDGMENT2501.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.3131/2017 (exemption) W.P.(C) 681/2017 & CM No.3130/2017 (stay) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.1. The petitioner, by the present petition, seeks a direction to respondent No.1 to permit the petitioner to participate in the forthcoming tender for laying gas pipeline in NCT of Delhi and Rewari. The last date for submission of the tender is 31.01.2017 at 3:00 pm. Further...
Surender Mohan & Anr. Vs.madan Lal & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
$~12 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: January 25, 2017 RSA312017 SURENDER MOHAN & ANR. Through: Ms.Sagari Dhanda & Mr.Prashant Sharma, Advocates ..... Appellants MADAN LAL & ANR. Through: None versus ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT (Oral) CM No.3177/2017 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. RSA312017 1. By way of this Regular Second appeal filed under Section 100 CPC, the appellants call in question legality of the judgments rendered by the First Appellate Court dated 26th September, 2016 and of the learned Trial Court dated 23rd November, 2015 whereby the Civil Suit No.183/2012 stands dismissed for not disclosing cause of action.2. This being second appeal, existence of substantial question of law is a condition precedent for entertaining the second appeal. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that in respect of the relief of injunction sought RSA No.31/2017 P...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.mahinder Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: January 25, 2017 + MAC.APP. 429/2008 & C.M.10894/2008 & C.M.No.5& C.M.No.15581/2009 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate Versus MAHINDER SINGH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT % ORAL1 Impugned Award of 31st March, 2008 grants compensation of `4,50,000/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum on account of death of a housemaid-Rekha Devi aged 42 years in a vehicular accident on 1st November, 2004. The facts of this case are already noted in the impugned Award and so, needs no reproduction. Suffice to note that appellant- insurer had also got examined concerned witness (R2W1) from the Transport Authority and had placed on record details of licence particulars as Ex.R2W1/A and as per this witness, the licence was valid on the day of the accident.2. By taking the income of deceased as `40,000/- per annum and by applying the multiplier of 15, lo...
Modi-Mundipharma Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. Vs.modi-mundipharma Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:02. 12.2016 Judgment Pronounced On:25. 01.2017 CO.PET. 438/2016 MODI-MUNDIPHARMA HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD.... Petitioner No.1/Demerged Company AND MODI-MUNDIPHARMA PVT. LTD. Through:... Petitioner No.2/Resulting Company Mr. Rajeev K Goel, Advocate for the... Petitioners Ms. Aparna Mudium, Assistant Registrar of Companies for the Regional Director CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. This joint petition has been filed under Sections 391(2), 394 and 100 to 104 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), by Modi-Mundipharma Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Demerged Company) and Modi-Mundipharma Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Resulting Company) seeking sanction to the proposed scheme CO.PET.438/2016 Page 1 of 15 of Arrangement (hereinafter referred to as proposed scheme) between the Demerged Company and the Resulting Company.2. The Demerged Company and th...
Vir Karan vs.the Managing Committee, Army Public School and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % VIR KARAN W.P.(C) No.5027/2007 None. Through: versus 25th January, 2017 ........ Petitioner THE MANAGING COMMITTEE, ARMY PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner impugns the action of the Army Public School, represented by respondent nos. 1 and 2, in appointing respondent no.4/Ms. Anshu Sahi as a Vice Principal of the school.... Petitioner prays that it was the petitioner who had to be appointed as a Vice Principal because he was senior to respondent no.4.2. A reading of the writ petition shows that the petitioner himself admits that the post of Vice Principal is a selection post i.e not an automatic promotion post on the basis of seniority and that the senior most person W.P.(C) No.5027/2007 Page 1 of 8 necessarily having to be a...
Union of India & Ors vs.j. Sons Company Ltd. J/v Narendra Engineers
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
$~ * 15 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 489/2015 & IA No.19896/2015 UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through:Mr Joydeep Mazumdar and Mr Debojyoti Bhattacharya, Advs. versus J.SONS COMPANY LTD. J/V NARENDRA ENGINEERS ..... Respondent Through:Mr Raman Kapoor, Sr. Adv. with Mr F. Hasan, Advs. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR % ORDER2501.2017 IA No.19897/2015 (delay of 25 days in filing the petition) and IA No.19898/2015 (delay of 148 days in re-filing the petition) 1. These two applications have been filed by the... Petitioner, Union of India. IA No.19897/2015 seeks condonation of delay of 25 days in filing of the main petition i.e., OMP No.489/2015 under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) challenging the Award dated 19th November, 2014 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal (T) by a majority of 2:1, and IA No.19898/2015 is an application seeking condonation of delay of 148 days in re-filing of the petition.2. The facts relevant for deciding these t...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »